2010-03-15, 17:50 | Link #6601 | ||
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Quote:
Quote:
And I can't see a single hint that would make me think that Virgilia is not a witch.
__________________
|
||
2010-03-15, 18:03 | Link #6602 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
Think about what you're saying. You're saying there must be only one way to interpret the word "witch" throughout the entire game. As I've pointed out, there's no reason that needs to be the case. It's possible that the character "Virgilia" is a witch who can use magic, but she is also furniture. Which means she's not Kumasawa, but a personality that might have been played by Kumasawa. Beatrice believed her in the same way Maria believed Beatrice. It may be that Kumasawa taught Beatrice how to create her own imaginary world out of pity or by Kinzo's orders, but that doesn't mean that Kumasawa herself believed it. And even if she did, you still haven't shown any evidence that Kumasawa didn't have a similar difficult past. I see that you have your interpretation and that's fine, but the fact that yours exists doesn't make mine any more or less likely.
__________________
|
|
2010-03-15, 19:17 | Link #6603 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Classified
|
I figure that Virgilia simply represents Kumasawa during the magic scenes. If we consider Beatrice's 'furniture' as their own entities, then it gets a tad messy with the number of people on the island...
Also, for EP1, on the subject of the murders of Genji, Kumasawa, and Nanjo, it's stated in red that And of course, the three were killed by other people! In that case, doesn't it mean that there's more than one person who faked his or her death? Where's Scooby Doo when you need him? |
2010-03-15, 20:02 | Link #6605 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
"The three deaths were due to homicide" or something would be a bit closer. Quote:
__________________
|
||
2010-03-15, 21:42 | Link #6608 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Wasn't the argument Battler was trying to make something like that the three of them got into a mexican stand off and they all shot each other or something? Well he never explained where they got the guns so I thought this red was supposed to deny that by saying that they were killed by other people. Or maybe he made that argument after this red. I might have to look back because I don't really remember.
__________________
|
2010-03-16, 08:05 | Link #6609 | |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Quote:
In other words, in the case of furniture you consider every being that was labeled as "furniture" as necessarily a fake existence, including Genji. Then for some inexplicable reasons you think that Virgilia despite being labeled as a "witch" dozens of time isn't really a witch. What lacks here is a hint of some sort that would justify the mere thinking that Virgilia is the only "witch" that isn't really a witch. There is none, this idea of your just come out of the blue. This is the same as if someone suddenly said, "in reality Genji a is female to male transexual". You can't deny that, but what in the world make you think that?
__________________
|
|
2010-03-16, 16:36 | Link #6611 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In the Meta- World... on Virgillia's bed.
|
Furniture (noun)- Any movable article within an establishment that make it fit for living. This includes chairs, tables, cabinets, desks, etc.
When a servant says that they are a furniture, they are pretty much repeating the fact that they are a servant, which is a person employed in the service of another mostly for the case of making their life easier. So, in a way, furniture = servant because both are used for the purpose of another person's life. So, for it to be a must for us to suspect a servant of being a fictional person because they call themselves furniture isn't really necessary. I mean, aren't they just emphasizing the fact that they are a servant? May I also note that Virgillia doesn't have to be a servant to Beatrice, she's just used as a piece for this game. Its already said that she's a finite witch and because she is a witch that makes her above demons and the like. Besides we've already seen her command goats, so we can say that she's above them. Also, Beatrice might fall into the same category as Virgillia because she was under Kinzo's command as well. So with that I can summarize it as: Any person can call themselves "furniture" as long as they are employed under the benefit and service of another person's life. Now, onto Kumasawa herself, We don't know how long Kumasawa has served in the Ushiromiya family and considering that she doesn't bear the mark of the One- Winged Eagle (or at least not that we have seen), we can assume it wasn't for very long. So, we can say that she hasn't been influenced by Kinzo all that much and thus hasn't inherited any of his western tastes. Also, the girl taught by Virgillia could have been the First Beatrice (the Beatrice that gave Kinzo the gold), so we really can't say that the littler girl and Shannon are the same person. |
2010-03-16, 19:34 | Link #6612 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
@ErenselTheJester:
Well, we know from Kumasawa's tips and everyone's statements that she's served the family a long time, plus we know for a fact that she loves telling the old ghost stories about Rokkenjima that were famous among the sailors and the other servants. This includes the story of the witch Beatrice. Hmm, I personally doubt that the girl taught by Virgilia was the first Beatrice since the scene seems to have taken place in Kuwadorian. It might have been the second Beatrice, but that one supposedly told Rosa "I do not know any magic", while the Beatrice taught by Virgilia supposedly started "learning" magic as a little girl. As for the furniture, that interpretation is very possible of course, and it's the one I assumed was true most of the time when reading the question arcs. Still, it's a very uncommon and strange way for even a servant to refer to themselves, especially considering that this is 1986. I've never heard of a servant referring to themselves that way. And why did being a servant mean that Shannon and George couldn't fall in love? After all, -on servants don't stay employed for life, and Shannon had already worked much longer than a normal servant. It should have been as easy as quitting her job sometime in the last year and going out with George publicly.
__________________
Last edited by chronotrig; 2010-03-16 at 19:50. |
2010-03-16, 20:09 | Link #6613 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
It's no proof they couldn't, merely that they didn't. It's the same problem I have with people who theorize Genji as an accomplice or murderer merely because he's "acting on orders." Just because Genji is portrayed as a very loyal person doesn't mean he isn't a thinking and feeling human being who would balk at the idea of murdering over a dozen people. Now, that doesn't prove he wouldn't do it, but I think he needs a better motive than that.
Just because the text says "they couldn't fall in love" doesn't mean they couldn't. Indeed, we've seen evidence to the direct contrary of that. But Shannon does seem to have some kind of hangup about the whole issue. However, I'm less inclined to trust what the pseudo-magic-world of ep6 says any more than I was the ep2 or ep3 or ep4 ones. They're inconsistent enough that I can't see them as anything but thematic. And the theme, as I see it, is that they're often portrayed as "mere furniture" yet they behave in very much human ways. I think who they are as people (or a person, depending on how you think it shakes down) is more important than the unusual way they address themselves. |
2010-03-16, 20:13 | Link #6614 | |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
Of course, this idea supports Shkannontrice since Beatrice remembers the dream as one of her own. |
|
2010-03-16, 20:49 | Link #6616 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
@Renall:
So are you suggesting that we just ignore all of those scenes? What about the entire first part of EP2, with all that talk about needing a golden brooch in order to have love? Also, remember that Shannon apparently only felt "qualified" to love George after smashing the mirror? Both of these fit in perfectly with my theory: it's adding a new magic rule to sidestep an old one, just like Ange reviving Sakutaro for Maria. The rule was: furniture cannot love a human. However, Sayo later "discovers" that if they undergo trial X or use magical object Y, they might be able to get around this rule. If you're suggesting that these parts were just "thematic material", exactly what theme are you talking about? All that just to describe how hard it is for there to be love between a servant and the family she serves? Why does Beatrice appear here? Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-03-16, 21:14 | Link #6619 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Classified
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|