2009-12-20, 01:08 | Link #121 | |||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York, NY
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
@justavisitor So you're saying that Alto's an idiot? |
|||||||||||
2009-12-20, 02:37 | Link #122 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Else why would Misa be offended by a Minmay poster and the damn scarf. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not a Ranka shipper. I'm not a Sheryl shipper. Alto both loves Sheryl and Ranka. This is not without a precedent in the franchise. Mylene equally both loved Basara and Gamlin and can't choose. That love triangle no longer mattered as it became a Bromance end. Here it is a Sismance end with a side of harem. |
||||||
2009-12-20, 05:07 | Link #123 | ||
(☞゚∀゚)☞ロンパアアアア!!
|
Quote:
And put the dress on yourself please~! I love seeing you in the dress as long as you do not sing with false tenor in Diamond Crevasse! 8D Labu, Nat <333 P.S: Put your impression on the novel with a blast Takky \o/ That might help me change my mind of bring lazy to buy it ;D Quote:
... Seems like no one believe me though ;-; /runs off to Brother Stray ;___;
__________________
|
||
2009-12-20, 05:56 | Link #124 | |||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 48
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Oh, come on. You can't seriously be comparing Mylene ( or Basara ) to Alto, can you? That has to be a late or early Aprils Fools joke.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
2009-12-20, 08:35 | Link #125 | |||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York, NY
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Translation: You are both important to me! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ranka: Sheryl-san I won't lose in song or in love Sheryl: I accept your challenge Moral of today's post for Reddywolf: One should actually watch a series before he decides to comment on it. |
|||||||||
2009-12-20, 08:40 | Link #126 | |||
Dame Cheesie
Graphic Designer
Join Date: May 2004
|
I'll go through the mountains of posts later. What caught my eye though, would be along the lines of:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
2009-12-20, 08:52 | Link #127 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 48
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2009-12-20, 11:14 | Link #128 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Wisteria I did watch both series. My POV unlike you and others are not tinted by shipping. Yes I'm neutral thus I'm more objective than either Alto-Sheryl fans or Alto-Ranka fans. If you actually watched Macross episode 36 Hikaru ignored Minmay's plea not to go. Not only to Misa but to the military. Before Hikaru joined the military he was a sky-idiot (better term sky-geek). The theme gets passed down to Isamu then Gamlin (Though not as obvious, watch Macross 7 Plus Top Gamlin) and finally this generation with Alto. |
|
2009-12-20, 12:39 | Link #129 | |
Nyaa~
Join Date: Mar 2009
Age: 35
|
Quote:
"Because I'm neutral means I'm right" is not proof. |
|
2009-12-20, 14:59 | Link #130 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York, NY
|
Quote:
Oh and just because you claim to be a unbiased poster doesn't make you automatically right. And in this case you are seriously wrong. Oh and episode 36 was the last episode of the show, there are only 36 episodes in SDF Macross. Before that he argued with Misa about going into combat right after reuniting with Minmei. Also in episode 36 he made his choice to stay with Misa, which would entail him staying in the military. Yet more proof that you don't know what you're talking about. Last edited by wisteria233; 2009-12-20 at 17:19. |
|
2009-12-20, 14:59 | Link #131 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Earth
|
@Foreshadow
hmm...wait...he only said he is more objective lol...objective doesn't mean "right" Example, "A newspaper should be completely objective on various issues"...this doesn't mean "A newspaper should be completely right on various issues" I am not stopping you from challenging him, but I think you unintentionally put your personal assumption into his post Of course, it's only my opinion XD
__________________
|
2009-12-20, 16:39 | Link #132 | |||
Nyaa~
Join Date: Mar 2009
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Had he only wanted to say he was impartial, he wouldn't say it as a retort to Wisteria, as reasoning to why his opinion is correct. He's essentially claiming his options are based on fact, while other posters are not, because they cannot interpret the facts correctly. Last edited by Foreshadow; 2009-12-20 at 16:59. |
|||
2009-12-20, 17:31 | Link #133 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Earth
|
hold on, a newspaper that is objective doesn't mean it is right on various issues, it only means that the article reports the story from both sides. On the contrary, a newspaper that is not objective only means that it takes opinion from one side and neglects the opinion from other side. Unless you are taking about editorial, but I was thinking of an article from a newspaper when I wrote my example....
Anyway, this is way too off-topic... As I said, I just raised out a concern, not trying to stop you or anything...damn six more months to wait for the movie....XD
__________________
|
2009-12-20, 17:54 | Link #134 | |
Nyaa~
Join Date: Mar 2009
Age: 35
|
Quote:
The Objective article presents the story based on fact, and covers both sides. It is CORRECT, because it is based on FACT from both sides without taking emotional factors into account. On the other hand, Because the other article neglects the situation of the other side, it leaves out crucial details that could be missed by only covering one side- MAKING IT INCORRECT, or WRONG, while already being prejudiced against the other side further distorting the story. He is inferring that because he's neutral he can see both sides and conclude properly better than other people, because they have a preference and that would "obviously" make them incorrect. I would hope you would notice that most members of this forum are quite capable of objectively looking at the situation and properly drawing a conclusion with factual statements to back it up. Just because a person has a preference doesn't make them unable to objectively analyze a situation any worse. What I am asking him to do, is rather then using his "Neutrality" as a justification for his examples, use actual proof. Last edited by Foreshadow; 2009-12-20 at 22:23. |
|
2009-12-20, 23:10 | Link #136 | ||
LOL'ing at t3h old bags
Join Date: Oct 2008
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Proof that Alto BOTH loves Sheryl and Ranka? Wasn't that his point? I don't think there's a need for an actual proof of that. Quote:
Spoiler for psst:
Not that we're saying you're making rubbish but there shouldn't be anything wrong in asking for a scan/screenshot of the parts you've translated. Didntcha know shaloom was hailed and defended strongly here too because he's been saying some good stuff. That is until someone exposed him. XXD That wouldn't have happened if he had credible sources tho. Just saying. |
||
2009-12-21, 00:20 | Link #137 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
Anyways, I found this Japanese blog talking about Vol 3 of the light novels, if I'm not mistaken the AltoxSheryl episode 22 scene was also addressed here: http://friederike.blog90.fc2.com/blog-entry-737.html マクロスフロンティア Vol.3 アナタノオト (角川スニーカー文庫) (2008/12/31) 小太刀 右京 【アルト、男になる】 性的交渉があると男になるというのもあるけどこれどうなんでしょうね?アルトは童貞をシェリルは処女を捧げ ちゃったっぽい話ですがもうアニメでグレーゾーンだったところを見事書いたな、小説。個人的にはちょっとシ ョックでした。グレーゾーンで良かった…(><)なんか、かなーり複雑だ。 I checked it out in Babelfish, but I can't make out 90% of the words... ^^; There was something about Alto being a man, and the word virgin, sexual negotiation, Sheryl... Last edited by KaoruLia; 2009-12-21 at 05:08. |
|
2009-12-21, 05:07 | Link #139 | ||
...
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
*skips all those wall of texts*
Quote:
@tak: have you got your novels copies yet? we're waiting for you Quote:
【アルト、男になる】 性的交渉があると男になるというのもあるけどこれどうなんでしょうね?アルトは童貞をシェリルは処女を捧げ ちゃったっぽい話ですがもうアニメでグレーゾーンだったところを見事書いたな、小説。個人的にはちょっとシ ョックでした。グレーゾーンで良かった…(><)なんか、かなーり複雑だ。 [Alto, became a man] It said that a boy will become a man after he experienced a sexual intercourse, but I wonder about this one. The story that, it seems Alto gave his virgin and Sheryl gave her, in the anime where this scene was a grey zone, the novel blatantly mentioned it. Personally I'm a bit shocked. I prefer it's greyzone still (><) I cant describe my feeling somehow. |
||
|
|