A Laugh A Day

[Xefi]

Originally Posted by Hasumi

I remember them being maybe edible, not sure.

Their habitat is kinda nasty, though...so probably cook them first.

Usually in tree bark, very moist...

ugh....my stomach. i'll pass on eating these, thank!

some people keep them as exotic pets

i'll pass times 2. them as pet? not my fetish, but i'm sure someone here might like creepy crawlers.
EDIT: *give some Madagascar Hissing Cockroaches to Konachaga* u likey? nya ha haa! ^_______^

[RRW]

[Velsy]

Originally Posted by Hasumi

If she did that I'd have called fake.

Saves throwing the disgusting little buggers over your self <.<

[Sumeragi]

[Zakoo]

I'm simply in good mood so ...

Spoiler for Uta prince ?:

Sometimes, having a fujoshi on an anime board simply makes a thread go crazy.

[Spectacular_Insanity]

Originally Posted by Sumeragi

^ It's funny because it's true. It's also sad because it's true.

[MUAHAHAHAHAHA]

Originally Posted by Zakoo

I'm simply in good mood so ...

Spoiler for Uta prince ?:

Sometimes, having a fujoshi on an anime board simply makes a thread go crazy.

Define crazy.

[Endless Soul]

Endless "Half of love is just "lo" and that's how I feel" Soul

[Birdway]

Spoiler for Don't open:

[Kyero Fox]

Originally Posted by Sumeragi

why do those women have mouths? ARREST THEM!

[Urzu 7]

Originally Posted by Sumeragi

We'd probably have polygamy legalized in some states if more people really wanted it and fought for it. Most people just want to be married to one person, though. And a marriage with two people in it is hard enough, right? So who'd want to try to work out a marriage with 4 or 5 people?

[SOGESNAKE]

[Urzu 7]

[Kyuu]

Holy crap. Is that squirrel dead, or paralyzed by the sheer pain of that? Holy shamoles.

[Chaos2Frozen]

....That's not his foot isn't it >_>

[LeoXiao]

Originally Posted by Chaos2Frozen

....That's not his foot isn't it >_>

...can't be unseen.

Originally Posted by Urzu 7

We'd probably have polygamy legalized in some states if more people really wanted it and fought for it. Most people just want to be married to one person, though. And a marriage with two people in it is hard enough, right? So who'd want to try to work out a marriage with 4 or 5 people?

To me, it seems the concern with polygamy is that it would almost certainly ensure the need for everyone in the group to be subservient to one alpha individual; i.e. the husband assuming this is multiple wives we're talking about. In the past, where there may have been a shortage of marriageable men, and where having women be in a position of clear inferiority was something of a necessity, having concubines may have been a societally expedient solution, but we live in a different age.

[Terrestrial Dream]

Oh god is that...

[SaintessHeart]

Originally Posted by LeoXiao

To me, it seems the concern with polygamy is that it would almost certainly ensure the need for everyone in the group to be subservient to one alpha individual; i.e. the husband assuming this is multiple wives we're talking about. In the past, where there may have been a shortage of marriageable men, and where having women be in a position of clear inferiority was something of a necessity, having concubines may have been a societally expedient solution, but we live in a different age.

Though things don't change. If recessive genes are triggered we still would have "lesser" offspring.

I don't believe in a makeup of 100% recessive genes. Each person has a talent we must find and hone so he/she/it can contribute to the betterment of society.

[Ridwan]

Originally Posted by Sumeragi

Back in the day, both cultures represented practiced healthy balance.

Originally Posted by MUAHAHAHAHAHA

Define crazy.

It's when heteronormative bigotry and unbrainy fujo-lust clash with each other.

[JokerD]

Originally Posted by LeoXiao

...can't be unseen.


To me, it seems the concern with polygamy is that it would almost certainly ensure the need for everyone in the group to be subservient to one alpha individual; i.e. the husband assuming this is multiple wives we're talking about. In the past, where there may have been a shortage of marriageable men, and where having women be in a position of clear inferiority was something of a necessity, having concubines may have been a societally expedient solution, but we live in a different age.

My thoughts are that polygamy must work both ways, meaning both males and females must have the right to take multiple spouses. Seems that when we talk about polygamy, it almost always means a male taking on several females.

Although I think in my version it's called an open relationship...