2012-04-15, 19:47 | Link #22 | |
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
I suggest again that you don't aim for as closer to perfect as possible image quality, but instead aim for good enough, and use the rest of your money for things that would improve your viewing experience more than 100% of Adobe RGB, like a better audio setup, or even a more comfortable chair would make your viewing experience better than near perfect color accuracy.
Quote:
If you decide that you do need a professional monitor, ask yourself whether the rest of your setup capable of using the display to its full potential? |
|
2012-04-15, 20:07 | Link #23 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 40
|
Quote:
As for being comfy, I switched to a couch since 2008, so no problem there. Quote:
Probably not. |
||
2012-04-15, 20:28 | Link #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 40
|
Quote:
What I need for PC is a good 2.1 setup (5.1 wouldn't do for PC) and a new monitor. My soundcard is Asus Realtek HD (I think). From what I can read on CNET the u2412m doesn't have any HDMI connection and isn't very good when it comes to viewing angles, but it's only 250€, so it might be worth it anyways. |
|
2012-04-16, 02:52 | Link #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 35
|
use an HDMI to DVI adapter or cable like synaesthic said. as for driving audio through the toslink optical port, there are multiple ways to hook it up to your future desktop speakers. i'm sure you can think of something since you set up a 5.1 home theater yourself.
but i really suggest you head over to head-fi to ask what desktop speakers you should get since you have cash to burn. i've seen some people get m-audio or swan speakers for their desktop but i never really looked into that sort of stuff. use google to find out what a displayport looks like. |
2012-04-16, 09:44 | Link #30 |
AS Oji-kun
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 74
|
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1366924
There are a lot of well-informed people hanging out at AVS Forum. I'm sure there are other relevant threads there as well.
__________________
|
2012-04-16, 10:28 | Link #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 40
|
Quote:
http://www.teufelaudio.co.uk/pc/motiv-2-p167.html http://www.teufelaudio.co.uk/pc/conc...set-p1053.html |
|
2012-04-16, 13:59 | Link #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 42
|
Quote:
Think tftcentral have a list of the different LCD panels and their properties, here is the link But most people won't be able to tell the difference anyway, unless they have another screen to compare it to, side by side. |
|
2012-04-16, 17:40 | Link #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 40
|
When watching animu, is it better to have a 23" 1920x1080 monitor or a 24" 1920x1200?
Because I read in reviews, that 24" 1920x1200 could pose problems with black bars and such because movies/animu/tv shows are in widescreen and adapted for 16:9 1920x1080 and not made for 16:10 1920x1200. |
2012-04-16, 19:58 | Link #35 |
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
16:9 means no black bars. Thus its best for watching animu, along with TV and other stuff that comes in 16:9 ratio.
Of course just about everything else is better off 16:10 1920x1200. Depends on how important watching anime is in your computer usage, since web browsing, etc, will all benefit from having some more pixels that 16:10 ratio would provide. |
2012-04-16, 20:48 | Link #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 40
|
Quote:
Animu is the most important (along with movies and video games of course), web browsing isn't all the important. Though I guess 16:10 would be better to read scanlations? Or is 4:3 better for scanlations? |
|
2012-04-16, 22:03 | Link #37 |
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Scanalations don't really fit well onto any standard aspect ratio. Since the other things don't matter, it comes down to your hate for black bars.
Despite the black bars, I would go with the 24 inch 16:10, even displaying 16:9 content 24 inch 16:10 provides more viewing area than 23 inch 16:9. 20.025x11.314in vs 20.352x12.720in. Of course some people really hate their black bars. Whether the size matters depends on whether you want the largest possible image, or no black bars. 16:9 at any size will have no black bars while 16:10 at any size will. Size of image depends on the size of the screen though. |
2012-04-16, 22:34 | Link #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 40
|
Quote:
So I can get any size wether it be 23", 24" or 27" and it won't look weird as long as it's 1920x1080 16:9, correct? Because from looking at different models, I never seen any 25" or 26", so I guessed there were different standards of sizes depending on the resolution and formats. |
|
2012-04-17, 02:27 | Link #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 42
|
As long as you keep the aspect ratio fixed, the image will not look weird. It will only look out of place if you stretch the image to fit the screen, and if the screen has a different aspect ratio .
Don't quote me, but IIRC screens bigger than 24" have nowadays a bigger resolution than 1920x1200. 27" and 30" panels have at least 2560x1440 nowadays. As for comic scans, you do not want to stretch the image. Depending on the source you should be able to fit two pages, next to each other, on the screen. |
|
|