2011-03-03, 23:54 | Link #18113 |
Senior Member
Artist
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Its only 450x148 450x150 and Konakaga and delorean2200 have a 350x150 siggy ( both with text) the only big difference is the width, and my siggy also fits in the box, I should be safe from those bunnies, but thanks for your concern
Last edited by Afternoon Tea; 2011-03-04 at 00:41. |
2011-03-04, 00:08 | Link #18114 |
ヒットハード&高速
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scanning...
Age: 37
|
@CaptnAwesomee: He meant file size, yours is 151,41 KB and the maximum allowed size is 48,8 KB, i suggest using jpeg especially since you don't need any transparent areas :P, as for the sig 8/10 aspect ratio is off and something seems else seems a bit off though i can't put my finger on it, however it does have an interesting design.
Konakaga: 8.5/10 nice work by patchy. matty543: 9.5/10 its also by patchy right ?
__________________
|
2011-03-04, 00:30 | Link #18115 | |
Senior Member
Artist
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Quote:
delorean2200: 8.8/10 |
|
2011-03-04, 00:45 | Link #18118 |
ヒットハード&高速
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scanning...
Age: 37
|
No that's not what we meant, the guys in the sig seem to stretched horizontal wise here is an example:
Normal correct ratio: Bad aspect ratio (like in your case): ================================================== ================== Halad: 9.3/10 strange that i missed seeing your sig the first time, overall nice looking, there's just one thing the blue on the right side near the hand seems to trow the sig a bit off would look better without it imho.
__________________
|
2011-03-04, 01:05 | Link #18119 |
Senior Member
Artist
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Oh okay, yeah it did seem stretched. I restored it so it maintained the correct ratio, it doesn't look stretched now. Thank you for your help with aspect ratio it does look better when its not stretched out
Last edited by Afternoon Tea; 2011-03-04 at 01:31. |
Tags |
rate, signature |
|
|