2012-04-18, 16:46 | Link #28481 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
In short they're similar to Sakutarou. For Maria he's real, alive and can die. Featherine explains the way Sakutarou can die are: - destroying his vessel - Maria dying - Maria stopping to play with him/denying his existence (well, that's what Ange does with the 7 sisters) Note that Sakutarou was resurrected when Maria acceted another body as his vessel and Ange sort of resurrected the 7 sisters again when she decided to re-summon them. The illusion of Shannon and Kanon being real is made perfect by the fact they didn't use a puppet body as vessel but a real human body so the illusion of them being real is way more marked than with Sakutarou, who's obviously moved and voiced by Maria (or the 7 sisters whose vessel is... well unmoving and not human shaped). Note that in Ep 7 we can clearly guess that Shannon is Yasu's imaginary friend and when Yasu decided to become Beato it can be viewed as if she handed her body as vessel for Shannon who automatically becomes the... let's call it the official personality of Yasu. |
|
2012-04-18, 16:52 | Link #28482 | |
Detective, Witch, Pirate.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ruins of the Golden Land
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2012-04-18, 18:49 | Link #28483 |
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
Is it possible that the narrative, mystery/fantasy, is entirely independent of the "logic" of the gameboard? Like there's no "mystery" or "fantasy" story, there's just one story (the narrative) which gradually becomes more and more fantasy while the who/how dunnit remains logic puzzles that are far closer to mystery.
To me it sounds like it could solve most problems concerning the why dunnits and the Shkanontrice reds. Also, I wanted to say that Shannon and Kanon cannot "come back to life and die at will". Even tho it's fantasy scenes, one has to happen, and has to play a role in the overall story that's going on. We've never been presented with someone just popping back alive with no narration process leading there. Edit: It'd be also interesting to compare something like perfect blue to Umineko. The main character has a messed up life leading them to have hallucinations but also is playing a role in a story who's lines and story happens to be very similar to her own real life. I'm bringing that up because there's a few times the movies showed a scene as if it was true to learn at the end that it's a cut for the movie they are making. Anyway, it feels like an influence on Umineko to me, but also might help to see Umineko in a different light. The story within a story aspect is much more clear. Last edited by UsagiTenpura; 2012-04-18 at 19:02. |
2012-04-18, 21:58 | Link #28484 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
and about Kanon appearing and speaking with Jessica, there's no proof that it was Kanon. What if Beatrice just used Kanon's voice at that time? since there's also a Golden Butterfly in that scene i can doubt that scene really happened [/QUOTE] |
||
2012-04-19, 00:04 | Link #28485 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
There is no observable or discernible difference. There is no rule that lets us know whether it "really is" Kanon. Do you not see how this permits Ryukishi to do or say anything he wants in this situation, if we accept what you're saying as true? He can literally have Kanon be present and acting like Kanon and then wave his hand and declare that Kanon was not there. If it's a single intellect posing as three roles, it isn't possible to declare any one of them dead while the body lives. If it's three distinct personalities which exist only as minds, it's impossible for them to be dead at all. If it's whichever one the author prefers at a given moment, it's poorly-written garbage.
__________________
|
|
2012-04-19, 02:56 | Link #28486 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
Also, in the case there are three personalities, it does not follow that any or all of them can't be 'dead' at all. Personalities can be dead, just perhaps not in the way you expected them to be. Once again, because this doesn't conform to a detective novel 'dead' does not mean it can't be a mystery in the genre sense. Nor does it immediately follow that this allows the author to do anything he wishes. As Ryukishi said in his own interviews, it is possible for one of the personalities to act even though they're dressed up and have an outward appearance of the other personalities. (But yes, Ryukishi did play a dirty, dirty trick on us. From his own mouth, he admitted this in one of his interviews, though he was being coy about what the trick was at the time.) I think the ultimate proof of this is at when Beatrice finishes giving the guns to the siblings in EP7, she is shown to sit down and not move at all. Her body is not dead, but at that point all three personalities are effectively dead. Once that happens, she won't make any moves, physical or verbal from then on. I think perhaps if someone is an artist, we would need a picture of the body Yasu, dressed as Shannon with wig and all, holding a smoking pistol but with an evil smile like Beatrice. This would perhaps sum up what has been going on the best. Anyways... let me finish writing up the quotes I've gathered... I think if you read through those again, the picture would become much clearer, if it hasn't already become clear from my Final Culprit Theory. |
|
2012-04-19, 05:12 | Link #28487 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Quote:
Also to whoever said real things can't die and come back, they sort of can. It is a semantics game, but with the classic cardiac definition of death (though it is disputed), people have been medically dead for periods of time. Sorry for the nitpick. No opinions on my Erika trapping herself with her "where the body is" idea? Also, this has probably been addressed a thousand times, but can someone explain to me the logic of the "I am the 18th human on Rokkenjima" and "still only 17 of us" reds? Is it the use of the word 'human' |
|
2012-04-19, 05:13 | Link #28488 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Quote:
Anyway, Isn't it enough that he declare himself as dead person and only living a spirit? Just like how a real dead person have a spirit after death based on beliefs, a dead personality can also have a remnant left behind after it died. Similar to Toyah's case with Battler and Kotobuki/Hisashi Yukari with Ange. The red truth doesn't really obliterate the existence of the personality itself , It just didn't allow them to show that personality again to other people . But Jessica's case was different, at that time, she was blind and in state of panic . This allows whoeverplayingasKanonShannonBeatrice to deceive Jessica into believing that Kanon was a spirit and still dead. Quote:
I hope you understand what i wrote here since i don't get it myself. English isn't my first language so it's hard to reply. |
||
2012-04-19, 08:06 | Link #28489 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
So the problem is that Shannon&Kanon's body has to be alive and if vessel is alive Kanon and Shannon can be resurrected at will and this makes their 'dead status' completely different from... let's say Nanjo. Quote:
Though yes, this gives Ryukishi a lot of freedom as the rules for Kanon and Shannon's presence are pretty unclear. For example it's likely that Maria acknowledge Sakutaro's presence each time she's with Sakutaro's vessel and says he's not there when she's without him and the only way to have Sakutaro's vessel around but not Sakutaro is to break Sakutaro's vessel so for Maria Sakutaro will be dead. However if we take Ange and the seven sisters... when can be say that they're not with Ange or that they are with her? We've only Ange's word on that department. And now back to Shannon and Kanon. They have a vessel and, if the vessel is witnessed and acts in a certain way it could be possible to say that 1 of them is present (it's impossible to say if the other is present as well though because the narrative might describe him/her as 'in the room but hidden from the view of the observer'). However technically it's possible to 'kill' Shannon and Kanon and have their vessel still move around and even fake their presence so just the vessel acting like one of them wouldn't assure us that they're there. This trick makes Shannon and Kanon as elusive as the 7 sisters while at the same time using a vessel that's way better than Sakutaro and that allow them to be acknowledged as real. |
||
2012-04-19, 08:23 | Link #28490 | ||
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
Quote:
Everyone backstabbing each other for money and showing their ugliest side... and then they all died in an explosion. So... Eva has no more idea about the specifics of the explosion then anyone else, and anything she'd say about others would only make them look bad. No points in insulting the dead and Eva would probably be insulting her own self in the process. It's thanks to her sacrifice that Battler was able to create arc 8 the way it was. Quote:
|
||
2012-04-19, 08:25 | Link #28491 | ||
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Perhaps. Do you have one?
Quote:
And what everyone seems to be forgetting is that we're never given context for any declaration of death, making it entirely possible to believe that no one ever physically died even when the red claims they did. After all, the only explanation of death we've actually seen alluded to by the author is a death of personality which is inherently temporary. Why shouldn't we just believe every use of "dead" in red refers to temporary personality death? To muddle the story in this fashion is a serious error. Quote:
It's more than a mere "dirty trick," it's effectively outright cheating. "This looks, speaks, and acts like Shannon, but at any given moment it might not actually be Shannon and I am under no obligation to provide any comprehensible mechanism by which a reader could know the difference. Also, I will make the life-or-death status of Shannon something I can and will codify at particular moments in the story, even though it doesn't mean anything because of the way I've set up this situation."
__________________
|
||
2012-04-19, 09:33 | Link #28492 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Quote:
Also in regards to reviving Kanon in ep 3, it is possible that Beatrice pretended to be him to give Jessica some last kindness, even though he was actually dead. That was the point of the fantasy scene after all. |
|
2012-04-19, 10:40 | Link #28493 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
Someone can go "So how did Kanon show up and talk to Jessica if he was dead?" and he can be like:
Like I said, it's one thing to see Kanon in the hallway only to have him turn around with an uncharacteristic grin and shoot the person who saw him. That's a clear indication that, appearances be damned, it's not Kanon. When "Kanon" appears before Jessica, treats her kindly, and acts in every possible way as if he is Kanon and Jessica is completely incapable of distinguishing that he is not Kanon, it would be absolute B.S. to say "but in actuality it wasn't Kanon." The hell it wasn't. And the point is, because he can get away with this kind of crap, he can essentially never make a mistake in his stories or contradict himself because he just has to change the rules that he never defined in the first place, and had an obligation to define.
__________________
|
|
2012-04-19, 11:49 | Link #28494 | |
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
Quote:
He never clearly put foward any set of rules and specifically told us it was our job to figure them out, so how can you claim he broke them or changed them? Don't you have any doubt at all that it might be you who got it wrong? This reminds me of physics, when a formula stops working past a certain range it's not because physics are arbitrary beyond such a point, but that the formula you had, tho workable in a certain range, needs to be replaced by a better and more complete one. From my opinion you never got past the formula of "typical mystery". The one thing I'm personally angry at Ryuukishi at is actually that I feel the readers who enjoyed it the most aren't those who tried to solve it, and rather got into the fandom of the whole, with battle games, fanart, and cosplay, etc. It'd be easier to accept a critic of an orange, if it was criticizing it as an orange, then as an apple. |
|
2012-04-19, 12:57 | Link #28495 | |
The True Culprit
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2012-04-19, 17:05 | Link #28496 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
The red truth is just a crutch designed to allow certain reasoning hence why it was introduced into the game. I do think it taking at face value is a mistake. It is what Battler did in the third game. In fact we seen Beatrice change the red truth by stating there are 17 people instead of 18. The red can even be defeated by the golden truth.
Also regarding the Shannon/Kanon personality trick is unfair. Keep in mind that Beatrice was capable of reveling and killing both Shannon/Kanon at will during the games, I think that was suppsoe to be the hint. As well that the two had a certain meta awareness as Beatrice. You cannot argue that Ryukishi did not display any indication that those pieces were different then the rest. If you compare this to chess. Shannon/Kanon are the witches' pieces that have basically the ability to turn off and on. We seen that certain pieces can be given ability that can be considered cheating. Erika as Bernkastel's piece has full meta awareness and the detective authority. For the human side that is pretty much cheating if you consider how little Battler had. You know when I first watched the anime first, I had the impression that the culprit(s) was impersonating a few of the characters since Rosa brought up the point of "are you really Rudolf's son?". My first theory was that Genji=Kinzo and Kanon=Shannon. Granted it seems silly now but that is how I thought the solution to the first game and second game could be explained. That they "killed" one of the characters to allow one free rein to commit more murders. Quote:
Also being Jessica scared, lonely, and grieving from her parents' death could not be that hard to fool. If you think about it. If you think that culprit was talking to Jessica, there is only short list of people that are able to impersonate Kanon. The culprit having a significant voice range was a given since Beatrice's voice did not ring any bells when people heard her in game 2 and in game 4. Quote:
Quote:
Lets say you play chess with one person. You shows him most moves but neglects to mention other moves that pieces can do leading to win every match. Is that really cheating or just within certain information to keep an advantage? You did not really break any rules. I do think that is basically what Ryukishi/Beatrice's game was. A chess-like game completely made by her allowing her to create/reveal the rules or even bend them on a technicality. |
|||
2012-04-19, 19:29 | Link #28497 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Yeah, three personalities existing in one body, but personalities can commit suicide or be told by another personality to cease to exist. (Abandoned, dead, future cut off, perhaps would be more accurate.)
Quote:
Ahh... nvm.. I'm going to cut short this reply and get back to working on the mega post I have lined up. You should really consider what the quotes I will have in EP1 and 2 are saying first, and see if you can come up with a different perspective. (Something apparently EP4 had been saying alllll over the text, but I'll get to those EPs in another post.) Quote:
What if the Shkannon hints are only for the greater mystery of the culprit and not for the detective mystery hijinks? I'm re-reading EP4 and it struck me at one point with Ange(Gretel), Battler and Beatrice's discussion at how useless the red, blue and gold texts are for solving anything other than the greater mystery of Shannon's situation. Because if you think about it, using red text to solve a detective mystery would technically be a violation of typical detective fiction, not to mention Knox rules. I think more than a few people have posted that on here. I'm starting to think it's not just a violation, but useless. To the detective mysteries, perhaps all text ends up being 'black.' EDIT: Quote:
Anyways, I'll try to post that mega post tonight since I'm nearly done. I hope there's no message length limit on here. 8) |
|||
2012-04-19, 20:50 | Link #28498 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2012-04-19, 23:50 | Link #28499 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Umineko Comprehensive EP1-2
I've gone through EP1 and 2 looking for specific clues now that we know The Answer as I outlined in a few posts awhile back. I was looking for places where Yasu, who wrote EP1-2, wrote her thoughts on topics like, "Humans are XXXX" or "When we were children we were ABC, but as we grew into Adults we were XYZ" as opposed to narrative, action or mystery. Of course there's even more hints about the specifics of the murders and so on, but I put those elsewhere as we already kind of know the answers for those. (I suppose I'll post those elsewhere one day.) First, you should actually read the answer I posted or else nothing will make sense. Spoiler for Umineko Final Culprit Theory:
The Answer We've known since the Author Theory that Yasu wrote her thoughts and situation she wanted someone (especially Battler) to figure out right into the text, so this is really just picking through and identifying what's there. I was able to slot everything into two main themes for EP1 and 2, Adults vs. Children and some narrative or hints about Beatrice and Shannon's situation. I want to point out that I'm not really making a 'theory' here; rather, I am simply organizing the two largest themes presented in EP1 and EP2 and letting them speak for themselves. When I looked at the notes, it looked like Shannon and Beatrice's entire story and the solution lay bare, right there, on the page for us. Spoiler for The quick summary...:
I've tried my best to summarize each quote without injecting opinion or any theories and stick to confirmed answers. I'll wrap this in several layers of spoilers as there is a huge amount of text. The quotes are taken from the text of EP1 and 2, so it's not like you need to re-read it if you remember the scene in question. They will serve as a refresher and reminder for those of us who haven't gone through EP1-2 again. (I was surprised at how much I've forgotten, or just plain ignored! 8) ) Spoiler for Theme 1: Adult vs. Child:
Spoiler for Theme 2: Beatrice and Shannon:
Last edited by Kylon99; 2012-04-19 at 23:54. Reason: Added link to parts 1 and 2. |
|
|