AnimeSuki Forums

Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   AnimeSuki Forum > Anime Discussion > Older Series > Retired > Retired M-Z > Steins;Gate

Notices

View Poll Results: Steins;Gate - Episode 15 Rating
Perfect 10 26 36.11%
9 out of 10 : Excellent 20 27.78%
8 out of 10 : Very Good 18 25.00%
7 out of 10 : Good 5 6.94%
6 out of 10 : Average 2 2.78%
5 out of 10 : Below Average 1 1.39%
4 out of 10 : Poor 0 0%
3 out of 10 : Bad 0 0%
2 out of 10 : Very Bad 0 0%
1 out of 10 : Painful 0 0%
Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-07-15, 11:57   Link #61
klare
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: May 2009
it has to be Daru! the hair color, the time they were shown together, the comment by Mayuri etc

a bit sad to hear that Okabe and Kurisu become real enemies in the future
__________________
klare is offline  
Old 2011-07-15, 12:17   Link #62
Alucard24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by king12354 View Post
It's also interesting to see that they both died during the same year and also the year the part-timer time traveled back. I'm not going to speculate on it but I wonder why.
Well, she said they were dead in 2036, not they both died in 2036..... If you die in 2034, you're still dead in 2036
Alucard24 is offline  
Old 2011-07-15, 14:20   Link #63
thundrakkon
Anime-Only Viewer
*Graphic Designer
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
After watching this episode, it reminded me of some of the earlier transactions with John Titor. Didn't the first messages from John Titor appear in the year 2000? Suzuha did not arrive in this version until 2010, and she claimed it was not her who wrote those messages in 2000.

It would seem strange for another person to also claim to be John Titor and write about time travel, so logically, it would seem like it was Suzuha as well from back then. That would probably mean that this current Suzuha traveled further into the past at some point in the future.

If it is true that Suzuha travels back to the past, and the time machine does not travel to the future, then Suzuha could have stayed back in 1975 until the present. Hence, I would expect to see an older version of Suzuha come present the IBN5000 very soon.
__________________
<img src=http://forums.animesuki.com/picture.php?albumid=4341&pictureid=57813 border=0 alt= />
thundrakkon is offline  
Old 2011-07-16, 04:53   Link #64
Alucard24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Well, Okabe did say Titor posted message in 2000 but after he sent the first d-mail (the one about Kurisu), suddenly the fact that Titor was there in 2000 was wiped out and instead, Titor traveled in 2010.

Suzuha said she is John Titor and that she never went to 2000 wich mean that Okabe changed the past. But how a D-Mail about Kurisu death could change that ???

The year 2010 is clearly writed on the badge Suzuha has, would that badge have changed ?
Alucard24 is offline  
Old 2011-07-16, 17:32   Link #65
DezoPenguin
Beta by Accident
*Author
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maine
Age: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alucard24 View Post
Well, Okabe did say Titor posted message in 2000 but after he sent the first d-mail (the one about Kurisu), suddenly the fact that Titor was there in 2000 was wiped out and instead, Titor traveled in 2010.

Suzuha said she is John Titor and that she never went to 2000 wich mean that Okabe changed the past. But how a D-Mail about Kurisu death could change that ???

The year 2010 is clearly writed on the badge Suzuha has, would that badge have changed ?
That's exactly right; you'll remember that Okarin had a whole shelf of books about Titor from 2000, but they vanished and Daru had never heard of them. In that world line, Suzu went back to 2000, but the change in world line was, apparently, enough that she came to 2010 instead. Maybe it's because Kurisu surviving 2010 allowed her to build the time-leap machine, and it's her involvement with that that made 2010 a place where Suzu felt she should jump back to?

...complex stuff; I can't help thinking that the gamers are way ahead of us anime watchers on this especially since the game would have the much greater volume of explicatory text.
DezoPenguin is offline  
Old 2011-07-17, 03:08   Link #66
Alucard24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
But there is something strange : Suzu said that SERN builded his own time machine with the data of Okabe but, Okabe made it thanks to Kurisu. In the original timeline, Kurisu die then, how could SERN make a time machine without Okabe data ?

And then, how could Suzu come in 2000 ?
Alucard24 is offline  
Old 2011-07-17, 08:48   Link #67
Time Runner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alucard24 View Post
But there is something strange : Suzu said that SERN builded his own time machine with the data of Okabe but, Okabe made it thanks to Kurisu. In the original timeline, Kurisu die then, how could SERN make a time machine without Okabe data ?

And then, how could Suzu come in 2000 ?
SERN never completed it. My theory is that the original timeline (the world line where the first episode took place till Okabe sent the first dmail) had already a divergence of 1.0000 or greater. In this timeline SERN never succeeded in establishing their dystopian dictatorship, and this is because Kurisu died in 2010 and thus never contributed with her time travel knowledge to SERN.

First post by the way, hello everyone
Time Runner is offline  
Old 2011-07-17, 11:01   Link #68
RadiantBeam
Test Drive
*Author
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Age: 32
Send a message via AIM to RadiantBeam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alucard24 View Post
But there is something strange : Suzu said that SERN builded his own time machine with the data of Okabe but, Okabe made it thanks to Kurisu. In the original timeline, Kurisu die then, how could SERN make a time machine without Okabe data ?

And then, how could Suzu come in 2000 ?
Do recall, Kurisu had theories about how a time machine could be built if I remember correctly; or at least, she had theories on how time travel overall would work, if it was possible. Even if she was dead, all it would take was for those theories to end up in SERN's hands, and they could test the rest of it all on their own without Okabe's data.

Also, do we know that Suzuha was the same John Titor that appeared in 2000? It could have been someone else who did it, and in another timeline she just assumed the name for 2010 because of the connection to her father.
__________________
RadiantBeam is offline  
Old 2011-07-17, 13:27   Link #69
Alucard24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadiantBeam View Post
Also, do we know that Suzuha was the same John Titor that appeared in 2000? It could have been someone else who did it, and in another timeline she just assumed the name for 2010 because of the connection to her father.
If it wasn't her, then the other person never made a time trip at all in the new timeline (or didn't post messages about that at least). But it's unlikely because Suzuha is the only one with a time machine except SERN and why would SERN use that nick name ?

I'm pretty sure it was Suzu as well in 2000 (in the timeline before the first d-mail). She was probably searching for her father just like this time wich make me think there is something in 2000 she would think usefull. The questions are : what is it and why is it now in 2010 instead of 2000 ?
Alucard24 is offline  
Old 2011-07-17, 20:06   Link #70
RadiantBeam
Test Drive
*Author
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Age: 32
Send a message via AIM to RadiantBeam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alucard24 View Post
If it wasn't her, then the other person never made a time trip at all in the new timeline (or didn't post messages about that at least). But it's unlikely because Suzuha is the only one with a time machine except SERN and why would SERN use that nick name ?

I'm pretty sure it was Suzu as well in 2000 (in the timeline before the first d-mail). She was probably searching for her father just like this time wich make me think there is something in 2000 she would think usefull. The questions are : what is it and why is it now in 2010 instead of 2000 ?
It's not something we should probably worry about too much. The whole idea of John Titor being a time traveler who visited the year 2000 is a true story, and the people who wrote Steins;Gate probably used his story as a way of introducing the world lines and the character of Suzuha.
__________________
RadiantBeam is offline  
Old 2011-07-18, 12:01   Link #71
Alucard24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
well, yeah but I don't like holes in a great story like this one, I always think there is an explanation
Alucard24 is offline  
Old 2011-07-18, 14:06   Link #72
Reckoner
Bittersweet Distractor
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 32
Well for whatever reason, the world line shifted when Okabe texted Kurisu is dead, and during this shift, John Titor visited a different time. There should be an explainable reason for this.
Reckoner is offline  
Old 2011-07-18, 19:10   Link #73
RadiantBeam
Test Drive
*Author
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Age: 32
Send a message via AIM to RadiantBeam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alucard24 View Post
well, yeah but I don't like holes in a great story like this one, I always think there is an explanation
I'm just saying, I don't think the whole thing about John Titor visiting in 2000 and having it switched to 2010 is a very big deal in-story; it's just a major change to show that Okarin changed something very important, and only he remembers it. Like Reckoner said, the bigger question is why Okarin's random text saved Kurisu's life in the original timeline.
__________________
RadiantBeam is offline  
Old 2011-07-19, 12:55   Link #74
Alucard24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadiantBeam View Post
the bigger question is why Okarin's random text saved Kurisu's life in the original timeline.
True, why a text that's not even sent to someone who could you know Kurisu was able to change the world to this extent ?

....

unless Daru is not who we think he is.
Alucard24 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We use Silk.