2011-08-28, 18:08 | Link #102 | |
~Official Slacker~
Author
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Xanadu
Age: 29
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2011-08-29, 18:52 | Link #104 | |
ゴリゴリ!
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Age: 32
|
Quote:
I love gamers sometimes.
__________________
|
|
2011-09-13, 18:13 | Link #113 |
~Official Slacker~
Author
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Xanadu
Age: 29
|
^ Now that will be a skeptical.
Many people blame the companies that developed the games. Mostly blaming Treyarch for some auspicious reasons for ruining the experience for players in Black Ops? I don't fully understand the rage myself.
__________________
|
2011-09-13, 19:22 | Link #117 |
Les Pays Bass
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
I'm pretty sure there are a lot, but I wouldn't be able to remember them off the top of my head. A few were the spawns being terrible, the knife and its lunge, the Stakeout being a very unpredictable gun, RC-XD being in a 3 killstreak, the Second Chance stage of "invincibility," and the single-burst weapons being completely useless because of the stricter cap.
|
2011-09-13, 19:53 | Link #119 | |
ゴリゴリ!
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Age: 32
|
Quote:
The problem is that the Modern Warfare fans will always complain when the Treyarch productions aren't exactly in the same style. They're supposed to be older weapons. Killstreaks weren't fantastic in Modern Warfare II either- grab a tactical nuke and that ends the game. Like what? As for guns and perks, didn't anyone complain about machine pistols and shotguns being quite OP for secondary weapons? Pro perks were easier to unlock and some of them were downright overpowered. Not saying Black Ops is superior, but both games have their flaws. Don't know why Black Ops is SOOOOO much worse, according to these people.
__________________
|
|
2011-09-13, 19:55 | Link #120 | |
~Official Slacker~
Author
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Xanadu
Age: 29
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|