2016-09-27, 06:37 | Link #602 | |||||
"Senior" "Member"
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Quote:
Quote:
Trump's answer is clearly the more intelligent one. See? Wasn't so hard. That which you consider the more intelligent answer is only that way for people who not only have the same views as you, but also use the internet for such detailed answers. The "normies" who watched the debate, maybe watch the pundits speak for 2 minutes afterwards and then turn the TV off won't give a damn about the deep, but biased analysis you made. And by the way, "cognitive dissonance" is identified based on "tells" that you wrote, like starting a sentence with "LMAO" and such things. So it's not really a buzzword. Quote:
And yet again you are hallucinating. You are accusing an unspecified amount of voters among Trump 14 million primary voters of racism, hatred and ignorance, just because they don't agree with you. I repeat, you accuse a huge amount of people you have never met of having a certain collectivist world-view, an unhealthy outburst of emotion and a lack of knowledge. Or in other words: You are hallucinating it. When I started arguing with you I said nothing other than that you have a ton of cognitive dissonance. And your first response was to picture me as a reader of various right-wing newspapers. That was a hallucination as well. For someone who dares to call others ignorant and racist, you sure like to make claims about people you do NOT know anything about. Just based on political views you are fitting the people into your favorite racist, sexist, xenophobe, everything-phobe patterns. You don't seem to care about facts in those moments at all. My personal guess is that your confirmation bias allows you be intolerant toward those you deem to be intolerant and they therefore, according to your views, don't deserve the same respect as the people of color you demand respect for. But I could be wrong. And, frankly, I hope I am wrong on this. Because it would mean you give up your so-called objectivity for a little emotional outburst and I think any country would better off without the "help" of such a person. First you used pundits to improve credibility to your original claim that Trump lost the debate. After I pointed out the lack of credibility for the media pundits based on how they failed in the primaries, you played the "spin" card. And now you are even feigning ignorance... Do I have to say any more than this? Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||
2016-09-27, 07:15 | Link #603 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
I'm not from the US, but have been following this election anyway with curiosity. Clinton looked much better I than expected! I think it's going to be a close match.
Don't really like this debate format, moderator guy presses for "details" then gives them 2 minutes to talk, lol. Is it really possible to unravel the left vs. right approaches to economics in that time to the uninitiated? Of course not. Best you can do is come up with zingers like "Trumped-up trickle economics!" and "Tremendous regulations!" Neither of their plans is wrong, just different, so I guess even if given time, they couldn't win here. Most of the following questions seemed like non-issues that get spun by the media for drama but don't really matter, like Trump's birther theories, taxes, and what he said a long time ago about the Irak war. All such questions seemed to fall on Trump, even though Clinton could be bullied with similar nonsense as well...she and the Clinton foundation are not without their baggage...so Trump was definitely at a disadvantage from the beginning. But overall, Clinton looked better, just more confident and polished, whereas Trump is just kinda being Trump, yelling, interrupting, and rambling. Maybe some people like that kind of thing and see it as him being "genuine", but to me it wasn't a very good impression. Clinton had some problems too, like how she was boasting about her transparency while having serious issues with that herself. Telling people to go to her website for fact-checking earned a chuckle from me. Then the race-bait, listing all the things where minorities are treated unfairly, and accusing Trump of racism...none of it holds up. Maybe she can get some minority votes this way, but at the same time she's losing votes from people tired of that shit. I'd say if you want to fix race relations, first stop throwing out racism accusations so frivolously.
__________________
|
2016-09-27, 12:05 | Link #604 | ||
Part-time misanthrope
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
It is very ironic that you are not above your own buzzword. Quote:
But if it is none of that, what is left for Donald Trump to be skilled at? There is one thing left for him and that is spearheading a movement that was originally based on the justified frustration with the class politique but has long passed that point with Trump fanning the flames wherever he can. Trump knows what a fire extinguisher looks like but has no idea where to get one. Trump is an entertainer but we don't need an entertainer. We need a president. |
||
2016-09-27, 13:25 | Link #605 | |
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
So my personal opinion is that this one, like most first debates, is a wash. The next debate will tell America if last night was a fluke or not.
__________________
|
|
2016-09-27, 14:09 | Link #606 | |
Squirrel Master
Join Date: Apr 2015
|
Quote:
I personally think that Trump did good early on, but he looked really weak later on. I was expecting him to tackle those emails, fishy immunity deal, the destruction of blackberries with a hammer, lost laptop in mail... and other crazy things Hillary did to obstruct justice. |
|
2016-09-27, 14:15 | Link #607 | |
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2016-09-27, 14:58 | Link #608 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Age: 40
|
The next debate will be in a town hall format. We can expect it to be brutal for both candidates in normal time, but I expect nothing different from Trump if not worse considering that the Commander-in-Chief Forum was close to that and yet Trump made a glaring mess out of it.
|
2016-09-27, 15:49 | Link #609 |
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
the most interesting thing about the debate happen after the debate. When Trump went after the former Miss Universe. You would think after the khan debacle, trump would have learn not to get side track.
Hillary dug a big hole and Trump jump right in.
__________________
|
2016-09-27, 15:58 | Link #611 | |
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
Quote:
The election is 6weeks form now. Lots more ppl paying attention. The smart thing would have been to make no comment.
__________________
|
|
2016-09-27, 16:03 | Link #612 | |
✘˵╹◡╹˶✘
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
There is a reason why he prepared it as his answer Edit, Secular Talk video on the debate, think it's very close to mine:
__________________
Last edited by risingstar3110; 2016-09-27 at 16:25. |
|
2016-09-27, 16:51 | Link #613 | ||
cho~ kakkoii
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
|
Quote:
So my question is if he starts heading lower, should he participate in anymore of the remaining debate? Same question apply if he starts heading upward. Quote:
__________________
|
||
2016-09-27, 17:10 | Link #614 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
http://aplus.com/a/grain-of-saul-sup...illary-clinton
This is a pretty good read on why, though Clinton isn't perfect, she's still the only reasonable choice. |
2016-09-27, 17:21 | Link #615 | |
✘˵╹◡╹˶✘
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
I don't think he gonna skip out on debates regardless whether he win or lose on the polls. The only scenario I could see is if he win by like 20-30 points across all swing states, and prefer to play safe (the same reason why DNC limit debates in primary). Otherwise there is much to gain in debate, especially for the challenging party.
__________________
|
|
2016-09-27, 18:23 | Link #616 |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Because he can't. Because anything he can accuse Hillary on, Hillary can pin something much worse on Trump immediately. Because Trump would rather his own supporters ignore his much bigger scandals, so he can't bring up ANY scandals at all.
__________________
|
2016-09-27, 20:44 | Link #617 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
https://twitter.com/MaxOfS2D/status/780654276053983232
https://www.google.com/search?q=trum...+polls&tbm=nws It's nice to know 4chan continues its fine tradition of being completely evil. Oh yeah and why pretty much most online polls are pretty shit. Last edited by MCAL; 2016-09-27 at 20:55. |
2016-09-27, 21:30 | Link #618 | |
✘˵╹◡╹˶✘
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
Political supporters is actually nothing comparing to fanbase of everything else. Movie, games, music, anime waifu. Every standard teenager nowadays have like 10 Facebook accounts. At least
__________________
|
|
2016-09-27, 21:46 | Link #619 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
Quote:
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonal...96008854876160 |
|
|
|