|
View Poll Results: Macross Frontier - Episode 14 Rating | |||
Perfect 10 | 50 | 51.02% | |
9 out of 10 : Excellent | 33 | 33.67% | |
8 out of 10 : Very Good | 11 | 11.22% | |
7 out of 10 : Good | 2 | 2.04% | |
6 out of 10 : Average | 1 | 1.02% | |
5 out of 10 : Below Average | 0 | 0% | |
4 out of 10 : Poor | 1 | 1.02% | |
3 out of 10 : Bad | 0 | 0% | |
2 out of 10 : Very Bad | 0 | 0% | |
1 out of 10 : Painful | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 98. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
2008-07-13, 05:46 | Link #282 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 48
|
Quote:
And as I said, because she looks like a child, a sexual/romantic adult relationship between Alto and her would be disgusting to me. I agree with Barack Obama that pedophiles deserve the death penalty, if that says anything about me. And I am a big old lefty otherwise. |
|
2008-07-13, 06:14 | Link #283 |
I disagree with you all.
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Pedophilia isn't a matter of looks. Ranka may look younger than she is (though not by as much as some of you claim, IMO), but she's only one year younger than Alto. Having a relationship with him would not make him a pedophile.
|
2008-07-13, 06:17 | Link #284 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 48
|
Quote:
As she looks like a child and behaves like one, the thought of her being involved in a romantic and/or sexual relationship with Alto is disgusting to me. Honestly, if you still donŽt get what I am saying, IŽd wish that IŽd have lone_wolfs talent for drawing, so I could make a pretty diagram for you. |
|
2008-07-13, 06:27 | Link #285 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
She's just a drawn character don't sweat it. It's the same old formula since SDF Macross. Who will you root for the younger girl or the mature one? Though Sheryl and Ranka are both childlish in personality, the very big difference is that Ranka has the body of a typical Japanese girl her age while Sheryl looks too mature for her age. |
|
2008-07-13, 06:36 | Link #286 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 48
|
Quote:
Also, IŽd dispute that all fifteen year old Japanese girls look like ten to twelve year old European ones. Sheryl is, btw., designed to look very European, with her blue eyes, french writing and, well, whatever her hair colour is. Blond-pink? |
|
2008-07-13, 06:38 | Link #287 |
I disagree with you all.
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
I understand it. And I know you can't really help the way you feel. I just don't find it very logical.
Can you imagine yourself saying about a RL woman, who happens to be short, flat, and look like a child, "She shouldn't have any adult relationship. It'd look disgusting to me." And sure, Ranka's just a drawing. But by that token, what's the point of being disgusted? |
2008-07-13, 06:43 | Link #288 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Then again there are those that make you go WHAT?! she's only 10? |
|
2008-07-13, 06:44 | Link #289 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 48
|
Quote:
Ranka, OTOH, is a *designed character*, who as a feature does look like a loli. I am apparently expected by the designers of her look to find that attractive. I do not. At all. And, I want to add, in RL I actually *prefer* small, slim women. But only up to a certain limit, which Ranka surpasses. She is designed to look like a child, and I really, really dislike that aspect. |
|
2008-07-13, 06:53 | Link #291 | |
*snore**snore* zzz.......
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
2008-07-13, 06:54 | Link #292 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Age: 48
|
Quote:
Yeah, I think that Ranka shouldnŽt have a romantic relationship by the look in she was designed. IŽd wish she would "grow out" some more, to make me less uncomfortable when I see the adult looking Alto going all lovey-dovey over Missus "I look like I am ten years old" Ranka Lee. If sheŽd been designed to not be so clearly a loli, then IŽd be much much less uncomfortable with a relationship between those two. As it is, it drops my appreciation for Alto as a character by two notches, because he apparently has no problem with her lolita-ness. I donŽt know, maybe it is supposed to be less noticeable in the "anime world" in which the characters live, but for me as a viewer, it surely is glaringly obvious that Ranka looks like a child in 95% of her appearances. |
|
2008-07-13, 06:56 | Link #293 |
Dame Cheesie
Graphic Designer
Join Date: May 2004
|
My two cents about Ranka's design:
I hate her design. I think it's obvious loli-bait for the lolicon crowd. I hate the way her hair flaps up like a puppy dog, I am still not sure about the fang as I can't help but think it's a good moe point for the otaku crowd. That shot with her pressing up against Alto literally drove the point home, I'm sorry, but I wish I could think up better flowery prose for "it made me almost hurl up". Her awesome personality/character saved her. But it's a mixed reaction, some people hate it some people love it. Can't change anyone's minds about it. |
2008-07-13, 07:04 | Link #294 |
I disagree with you all.
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
I don't find lolis attractive either (not in that way, anyway), but I'm more "tolerant". I don't need to lust after characters to wish them well.
And I don't find the "there's only one body type worth having" attitude very pleasant. |
2008-07-13, 07:12 | Link #295 |
Dame Cheesie
Graphic Designer
Join Date: May 2004
|
If I were to design Ranka, I would get rid of the puppy hair (or at least give her some long straight flowing hair that would do the same floaty thingie ) and maybe puff up her chest a little (she started out the same age as Minmei who wowed the audience with her bod fer cryin' out loud) I'm not saying Ranka needs to be wow sexy, I just wish her design isn't so loli-bait. There's a big difference. Well thats just my opinion, obviously the minority anyway looking at how all the points I hate are what others find cute.
|
2008-07-13, 07:49 | Link #296 |
Lovestruck Fool
Fansubber
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
People remember characters for their most distinct traits. These could be personality traits, or they could be physical ones.
In Nanase's case, for example, just about the only thing that most people seem to be able to remember about her is that she's a so-called 'healthy girl', as the euphemism goes. If she had an extremely memorable personality, then this quality might have been the focal point of her character, instead. Here too, it's just a matter of preference. You might like her for the way in which she's presented, or you might not. Incidentally, a 'loli' character design does not hinge entirely on bust size. It often tends to be a combination of both appearance and behavior. Last edited by Swampstorm; 2008-07-13 at 08:07. Reason: clarified jargon |
2008-07-13, 07:49 | Link #297 |
Lets be reality
Join Date: May 2007
|
Yes I would definitely give Ranka long hair if I was in charge of her redesign but I have a massive preference for long hair. I took one look at the first 2 page spread for the new manga from the guy who did Suzaku and instantly liked the long haired one better first. (chapter 6 ftw!)
Also it's obvious that Ranka is meant to appeal to the moe/loli crowd, arguing otherwise is pathetic. The difference in designs between a lot of characters shows that they want to appeal to a lot of different crowds. |
2008-07-13, 07:53 | Link #298 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 35
|
About the Vajra getting weaker.
Does anyone remember in episode 6 when they talked about using anti-vajra munitions? After SMS's testing of the weapons in episode 7, the entire NUNS fleet on Macross-F probably adopted the stuff for future use against the Vajra. |
2008-07-13, 09:22 | Link #300 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
THAT is the point. How much cleavage did she have, or did it look like she had baby fat on her? Plus, when Alto accidentally grabbed her, it doesn't prove that she has (you know) boobies at all! Look, if there's a girl with a surprisingly FLAT ass, and you put your hand on her inexistent ass, she'll probably recoil in humiliation too. That's because the social standard says that those parts are private, no matter how miniscule they are. Last edited by mike_s_6; 2008-07-13 at 09:36. |
|
|
|