2007-11-17, 14:25 | Link #21 | |
9wiki
Scanlator
|
Quote:
Torrents from IRC bots will only have limited use, though. If you can find the torrents, so can others. The ultimate answer will come from the ever-improving efforts of traffic anonymization which is actually available in the present. Keep in mind, though, like plain encryption, though, if you only protect PART of your traffic, that part is suspect.
__________________
|
|
2007-11-17, 14:26 | Link #22 |
Bloody Hell...
|
Hm. I have Comcast, but I don't know how worried I should be. The odds of being busted seem rather low, and until I'm sure that someone with the authority to do so has contacted Comcast about the issue, I don't believe there's really much that they can do about it.
At the very least, it means that people are now going to be a bit more selective about which trackers they use. The same files exist on multiple sites, so once one tracker has been deemed unsafe, people can just move to another one. Ultimately, there will be a loophole people will exploit. |
2007-11-17, 14:32 | Link #24 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
2007-11-17, 14:33 | Link #25 | |
Translator In Despair
Fansubber
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuwait
Age: 37
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2007-11-17, 14:39 | Link #26 |
guess
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Ok, so they are playing dumb. I still think it is really strange.
If it is not comcast but someone else doing this, why isn't the comcast legal department responding? Maybe they are taking their time to investigate this? If an American company has licensed it but doesn't want to announce it yet, why comcast only? It seems that these people only have access to the comcast customer information. That or these licensing companies really hate comcast. I am only guessing. Too many loopholes here.
__________________
|
2007-11-17, 15:07 | Link #29 |
Cutie Honey Fansubber
Fansubber
|
I submitted this to the slashdot firehose (vote it up, they love to hate Comcast there), and pretty much said that it's likely just a scare tactic since Comcast's recent tactics for scaring bittorrent downloaders are under federal investigation.
|
2007-11-17, 15:18 | Link #30 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
You're right, the whole thing is fishy. Comcast isn't helping... with them being unwilling to help the question, is this them looking to save bandwidth or is this them just being bad at customer service.
Of course if its the real deal, why didn't they just send the notice to Anime Suki? If they don't want to announce the licensing, then couldn't they just have the original copyright holder ask AS to list it as licensed, or just cease and desist? If they take it down that way, not an issue. Why make a move that would alienate potential customers? |
2007-11-17, 15:21 | Link #31 |
The magical one
|
If I were using Comcast and got such a letter, I would probably start mirroring some oversea university's FTP server in my /dev/null 24/7. If they were to saturate that, I would just switch to another. I seriously doubt they are going to saturate whole FTP protocol (:
|
2007-11-17, 15:25 | Link #32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
|
I have had comcast as an ISP for several years, and they heavily limit torrent use with network traffic shaping, etc. (although I still see acceptable up and down speeds). Also, in some west coast markets, they've been altering packets, so I wouldn't be surprised if it is another bandwith limiting tactic. I've have an old P4 that's dedicated to running torrents (which has included all of the aforementioned titles) nearly 24/7, so I'll wait and see if they're sending cease and decists in my market before I worry.
|
2007-11-17, 15:39 | Link #34 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
My issue is that comcast is the only high speed internet game in town... I wish Verizon would get FIOS here soon.
But the more I think about it the more it seems to me that Comcast may be involved in a bit of Shenanigans, since they didn't list who made the complaint, and won't contact me back. I think they are figuring that since it is a somewhat legit complaint that most people would just be scared and stop using their bandwidth. Truthfully, it doesn't make sense to me, they like me paying for their service well enough, odd that they don't like me using it. Its like buying a TV that won't turn on during primetime. Truthfully, the only reason I have high speed is the fact that I can download with it. For regular website traffic and e-mail you don't need a whole lot more speed than dial-up will give you. |
2007-11-17, 16:10 | Link #37 |
Mahjong Triple Pro
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
There needs to be some kind of law/postulate/corollary stating that whenever a topic about fansubbing pops up, the probability of someone saying something in the spirit of "Wow, is this the beginning of the end of fansubbing?" increases exponentially as n increases, where n is the total elapsed time in seconds.
__________________
|
2007-11-17, 16:13 | Link #39 |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Exactly as Avatar said, I suspect this is BayTSP expanding the scope of their work for Odex. I bet all 4 of these shows are licensed by Odex for release in Singapore.
Well, Comcast doesn't care about licensing or whatever -- they just pass the notices they receive along to their users. |
2007-11-17, 19:17 | Link #40 |
wolfen programmer
|
I just found an article where Comcast it getting sued by actual people now along with the complaint to the FCC. Now I'm really baffled as to why Comcast is doing stuff themselves like this.
http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/...cking-traffic/ |
|
|