2006-05-06, 14:06 | Link #143 | ||
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
Quote:
And here is what here wrote: Quote:
so you are as off topic as those guys who are discussing mines in space.
__________________
|
||
2006-05-06, 14:32 | Link #144 | |
NO ESCAPE FROM NYAAA
Artist
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2006-05-10, 13:21 | Link #145 | |
we girls arnt safe!
Artist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In the space between your walls
Age: 36
|
Quote:
So its not to far off toppic and I dont mind and I also get off subject to. Now, I think smart mines are a very good way to go and if you have thrusters on the sides for random movement they would be very hard to hit or like on banner of the stars the mines seperated when shot at making more targets and suprise attacks. now the best way to deal with mines would most likly be a disrupter feild that sends the off target or harder to get a target lock |
|
2006-05-11, 00:53 | Link #146 |
Illegal Additives
Join Date: Jun 2004
|
To date, I've only seen 1 show that had a true to life and using real physics depiction of a battle in space- Planetes. The first incident was the defensive weapons of a space station attempting to stop a rogue ship from crashing into it. They were using an array of railgun armed satelites but failed to hit because of the high speed of the missile. The solution to this really came out from the left field. The second event for this show was a melee battle between astronauts. Fighting in zero g with glue and bolt guns and knocking out one another through inventive use of innerita.
|
2006-05-11, 07:30 | Link #147 | |
Loyal Haruhist.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 37
|
Quote:
what was the name?
__________________
|
|
2006-05-11, 09:10 | Link #149 | |
Umeboshi!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tejas
Age: 48
|
Quote:
Also, about the only remotely realistic one I can remember, but it's really set more in the near future than the far future which makes it easier to call "realistic".
__________________
|
|
2006-05-12, 07:16 | Link #150 | |
we girls arnt safe!
Artist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In the space between your walls
Age: 36
|
Quote:
like in the future they will consider us low teck drouling savages and collect are articacts (which will be beer cans and none biodigrateable baby dipers) (witch means they will think Bud Wiser was our KING!) and did you all know we actualy have working rail guns today, they used one in WW11 but there to big right now to use efectively. |
|
2006-05-12, 07:47 | Link #151 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under New York City
|
You're thinking of "Big Bertha," the giant artillery the Germans used in World War One fired from a railroad. (I'm not going to get into whether Big Bertha is the correct name, etc. It's the Paris Gun.)
That's different from the the sci-fi railgun. This is a gun that fires a high-speed projectile using electro-magnetic coils. You can google all this I think. |
2006-05-12, 12:19 | Link #152 |
we girls arnt safe!
Artist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In the space between your walls
Age: 36
|
Thats correct! (^^) it was on a train but im not certain at the name eather....
EMC Electro Magnetic Cannon or MAC Magnetic Aceleration Cannon are my favorit future weapn (^^) |
|
|