2008-10-10, 20:48 | Link #65 |
Happiness witch´s followe
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Venezuela
Age: 30
|
Very well.... Im not going to kill you as exilon.... but i have to make a theory... i dont have any so i would like having this statements in red:
Spoiler for Statements:
Last edited by Goose Boy; 2008-10-10 at 20:53. Reason: Forgot something |
2008-10-10, 23:12 | Link #66 |
Asmodeus Saigo (>v<)/
|
Enough with the Kyrie business of Breast Seduction! Eh! Fine, I will recite!
Spoiler for Recitals:
Oh and... From now on, any recitals directly referencing to the truth of something will be ignored. Such as "Gohda is killed by Kanon" and etc. etc. Last edited by Nadeor; 2008-10-11 at 11:36. |
2008-10-11, 03:02 | Link #67 |
Philosopher of theories
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portugal
Age: 32
|
Aaw, Nadeor, that makes it harder to work with anything --' Can we still ask for denials in red such as "Krauss was not killed by Beatrice"?
Please correct the first red statement in your last post, I don't think that's gramatically correct :s Unless you did it on purpose. Also, have you finished your recitals post in the last page? It still says not yet complete, so I'm taking it as a no for now. |
2008-10-11, 09:56 | Link #68 |
The Human in the Big Red
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Up north where everyone is happy, jolly, and kind.
|
Again, I'm still not that sure about the 'truths of something' thing. It's be nice if you could clarify. Would something like, 'Maria is dead' be directly referencing to the truth of something? Would 'Maria died of a gunshot' be directly referencing to the truth of something? Would 'Rosa is sad that Maria is dead' be directly referencing to the truth of something? Or just stuff like, 'x was killed by y'. I'm sorry, but that phrasing kind of phrasing makes it vague for me.
(Hopefully, the three above are allowed, or otherwise this will get so hard.) I have some recitals. Hopefully none of them are directly referencing the truth of something. Spoiler for Recitals:
I suppose that's a lot of requests for recitals, so I'll stop there. Still, I'll trying to sort out the character's various relationships, considering 'love' is involved in some of the character's deaths. Gleh, I might do an analysis like CWA or Exilon. Maybe. Last edited by Asashio123; 2008-10-11 at 10:14. |
2008-10-11, 15:59 | Link #73 |
Philosopher of theories
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portugal
Age: 32
|
err, Nadeor, you have stated in red before that Rosa hated all her sibllings ("Rosa hates Krauss nii-san and her other siblings).
When I wrote that stuff, I wasn't expecting it to be recited. :P but oh well, that's nice! =D Now I think I should try to clarify where Battler and George stand in this. But I've got nothing to work with, baah. Ideas, anyone? Spoiler for some more requests:
Last edited by Exilon; 2008-10-11 at 16:10. |
2008-10-11, 18:00 | Link #75 |
Philosopher of theories
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portugal
Age: 32
|
yeah I remember, but if you wanted a mind*** you wouldn't even write anything in red :P I'm just divagating here.
Spoiler:
that's all for now, just a small drabble, nothing really too much, but it's also full of incoherences, I realize. well, it's time for us to start thinking up plausible scenarios. If I may, I would advice you to try finding what works where before we start thinking about any real motives. Meaning, when could x do y, for example. Like "Who has access to the keys in the servant's room while Eva and Rudolf are discussing the "wolf and Sheep" theory?" |
Thread Tools | |
|
|