2010-09-09, 21:25 | Link #8981 | |
Komrades of Kitamura Kou
Join Date: Jul 2004
Age: 39
|
Quote:
On the other hand it ain't a victory for tolerance either because this is almost obviously a late excuse for him to cover his own ass against mounting concerns and public opinion, not because he's seen just how misanthropic his actions are.
__________________
|
|
2010-09-09, 22:04 | Link #8982 |
~
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston
Age: 35
|
Government is not the only force that can abridge freedoms of speech. A free society, too, should not condemn the actions of private individuals that harm no one. The same logic politicians and military officials are using to make would-be Quran burners feel guilty about revenge attacks by extremists can be used to support censorship of drawings of Muhammad. A person who burns a Quran is guilty of no crime; the Supreme Court would agree. The media needs to stop giving these people so much coverage.
And if this Christian goes through with burning Qurans, I hope an equal number of Bibles and Torahs are burnt as well (they're all the same, word for word in many parts). |
2010-09-09, 22:42 | Link #8984 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Of course, the 50% rule of information passing applies. Where did you get that from?
__________________
|
|
2010-09-10, 00:42 | Link #8986 | |||
I disagree with you all.
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
2010-09-10, 00:58 | Link #8987 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
|
I don't understand this debate on freedom of speech. How is anyone impeding this pastor's ability to say what he wants? I don't see it. In fact others are just exercising their freedom of speech to tell him than he's a jackass and stupid for doing this. No one is suggesting sending in swat teams to take him down if he attempts to do it. He has every right to burn a Quran, if he actually bought and pay for it of course, but others can certainly tell him that doing so it pointless, going to cause more trouble than help anything, and the act of a idiotic bigot. Those are certainly the opinion many have and have a right to express. They certainly also have the right to try to persuade him to not go through with it either.
Lets get something clear cause I see a lot of people making this mistake about the first amendment. It does not in anyway grant you the ability to say whatever you want while avoiding avoiding facing criticism or consequences from those words or acts. In fact it is used for the complete opposite. It is to make sure the government does not take away your right from criticizing it or anything you feel is wrong or your dislike as long as you do it peacefully.
__________________
|
2010-09-10, 01:21 | Link #8988 | |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-09-10, 03:12 | Link #8989 |
Senior Member
Author
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philippines
Age: 47
|
Payne's J-List Twitter.
And, for the last two cents, it's mighty amazing and disappointing that it takes one pastor to rouse up the whole planet, just as a lone, hostage-taking ex-cop almost toppled down a government and invited war.
__________________
|
2010-09-10, 09:33 | Link #8993 | |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-09-11, 09:53 | Link #8995 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Besides, Japanese work ethic is an overkill where the workers are expected and supposed to slog their ass off to feed themselves. Increasing taxes won't solve the problem, another kind of solution is needed to maintain the tax rate, redocument the dead to reallocate the parliament's yearly pension budget AND boost economic growth out of stagnation. However, there might be a possibility that it may help in Japanese's economic problem, by cutting the national budget the government can go on a financial diet (pun unintended).
__________________
|
|
2010-09-11, 13:54 | Link #8996 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Age: 44
|
Quote:
Anyway I think reform structure in most countries is nearly dead. Ppl get to live more and then the active population can't finance them all.
__________________
|
|
2010-09-11, 21:09 | Link #8998 | |||
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
If only it is that easy to carry that out here, I wouldn't have to worry about my future job. I have two parents to feed in 5 years time, and possibly a third one if both of them decide to divorce and my dad decides to remarry.
Then throw in tax, CPF contribution, etc, heck I don't even have enough to buy anime figurines, my own home and a grand piano. Quote:
1. Didn't have children. 2. Didn't put money into investments. 3. Didn't save enough to last them for at least 40 years. Almost all the oldies want to retire at 50-60, and none of them had really saved enough for themselves or their children. The real issue lies with family planning I think. Sometimes I wonder how do people like Vexx and Seiji maintain happy families at their age where many people fail to do so. And I do envy their children and them. OTOH : Anti-Islam pastor called controlling, "mad" Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by SaintessHeart; 2010-09-11 at 21:28. |
|||
Tags |
current affairs, discussion, international |
|
|