2009-03-20, 22:13 | Link #1881 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 35
|
Talk about garbage on Television. As an American I feel ashamed that this was broadcasted on public television. These comments are asinine at best, and these people really have no right to be critiquing the Canadian Army. With out them this world still would be in the hands of Hitler... And to disrespect all the Canadians that have died fighting the War on Terror in Afghanistan is just a mockery of our own lost soldiers. These people on Fox News call themselves patriots when they belittle the sacrifices our armed forces have made is just moronic. |
2009-03-20, 22:37 | Link #1882 | |
Aria Company
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2009-03-20, 23:30 | Link #1883 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 35
|
I don't think I'm overreacting. Since I don't watch Fox News and they tout themselves to be one of/the best news source I'm to take what they brand as Fox News as a news, and this show is completely dispicable. Mocking the deaths of troops who try to protect our way of life whether its for comedy or hell anything is wrong. And Stewart/Colbert at least let the audience know that their really not a news show.
P.S. Mocking the dead especially those that serve to protect our liberties is beyond me. Mocking an administration you disapprove fine, but the dead have no ability to defend themselves and considering they sacrificed/payed the highest price to protect our ideals to go bash them on a "fake news" show still doesn't justify this despicable act. |
2009-03-21, 08:35 | Link #1884 |
カカシ
|
They're not really mocking the death of troops per se, but the Canadian military as an institution. I loled at the dude who said it's not a *smart culture* because everything isn't bullet-proof like in the US.
They fit the "stupid American" stereotype quite snuggly, which means they're arrogant and bigoted and should be ignored. |
2009-03-21, 13:11 | Link #1885 |
Aspiring Aspirer
|
Ugh, that really disgusts me, I can't believe they got the nerve to spew out Anti-Canadian crap on TV. The Canadian Troops stationed in Afghanistan are positioned in one of the most dangerous districts of Afghanistan and they got the nerve that to imply we're pussying it out?
It's always ironic to see news figures spouting how "cowardly" another country's soldier are while they stay at home snug and safe. But yea, they do fit the sterotypical "stupid Americian",. But something's wrong with their country if there's so many on TV. And it's funny they've talked about invasion, its a good thing they greed too much for our oil, gas, lumber and water.
__________________
|
2009-03-21, 14:15 | Link #1886 |
Le fou, c'est moi
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Age: 34
|
^It's Fox News. You either do not take it seriously, or you...hope the other guy doesn't take it seriously. Sadly a lot of people take it seriously.
It's a comedy program in any case, although the comedy is utterly low-brow and tasteless, with an ironic lack of the irony (get it? ) that makes the Daily Show or the Colbert Report fun. I have to admit, though, when Fox News claim it's making satire, and it's saying something ridiculously close to the message it's been sending out for years, I get an urge to rage too. I don't pay much attention to them, but apparently recently they've been saying things like "It's time for a Tea Party!" or "What if...now just what if...the military coups and liberates us from the Obamacommie regime?" Like, yeah. :/ |
2009-03-21, 15:09 | Link #1889 |
Pretentious moe scholar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 37
|
I recommend we send a team of our crack lumberjack commandos to go beat some sense into Fox News. Canadians don't need armoured everything to kick your ass.
|
2009-03-21, 15:20 | Link #1890 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Also Stewart and Colbert are on a channel called COMEDY Central, it implies that what they do is Satire, yet this crap is run on FOX NEWS CHANNEL, which implies to the viewer that there may be truth in what they say. I mean when watching anything from Comedy central there is no expectation for news or sound journalism because the network implies that its meant to dole out laughs. To an unsuspecting viewer who is surfing the channel and the happen upon this show, they might think its really a news dicussion... |
|
2009-03-21, 19:09 | Link #1891 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
The soldiers are just doing their job, and I believe they are really fighting either to live, or what they believe in. The Taliban are just a group of madmen hellbent on making this world a worse place to live in with their so-called "true religious values". They claimed to have been oppressed, but look what they did to their society and women! I never said that the Coalition who came in are perfect, neither are they all really good people. But certainly it is the truth that they are better people than the Taliban.
__________________
|
|
2009-03-21, 21:05 | Link #1892 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 28° 37', North ; 77° 13', East
Age: 33
|
Quote:
|
|
2009-03-21, 22:22 | Link #1894 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
2009-03-22, 01:42 | Link #1895 |
Aria Company
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Yet it's short on both the info and the entertainment. I just see Red Eye as fox news' attempt to cash in on the popularity of "fake news" shows like the Daily Show or Colbert Report while forgetting that in order to pull it off they need hosts and writers who are somewhat funny.
__________________
|
2009-03-22, 07:32 | Link #1896 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 35
|
My main problem is with the hipocrsy and the implications of the networks their broadcasted by. For the Daily Show and Colbert Report there's the expectance of comedy where as FOX implies that what is shown is news, big difference, and since most non fox watching people were to see this they would assume it was one of the long propaganda arms of the conservatives that has been called "news."
|
2009-03-22, 08:38 | Link #1897 | |
On a sabbatical
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wellington, NZ
Age: 43
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2009-03-22, 14:29 | Link #1899 | |
Pretentious moe scholar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 37
|
Quote:
I'd be the first to admit Canada's Afghanistan deployment is small (about 2830 personal total). However, it's pretty insulting to talk about how you don't even know a country is fighting along side you and to accuse them of leeching off you for defense when: a) they are one of only a few armies in the coalition whose rules of engagement allow them to participate in frontline operations. b) they not only provide security for the most dangerous part of the country, but extended their "shift" in that part of the country from 3 to 5 years. c) they have the third highest casualty rate (about 120 deaths so far, most since deploying near Khandahar in 2006) in Afghanistan after the US and Britain, and suffer 2-3 times the number of casualties for their size of deployment than either of those armies do. And this is coming from a citizen who has very mixed feelings about the Afghan mission (I don't like the Taliban, but I'm skeptical of the mission's chances of success and dislike backing a government that last time I checked still has the death penalty on the books for religious apostasy). I'm really hoping that the writers were honestly ignorant of what Canada's role in Afghanistan has actually been. |
|
2009-03-22, 15:44 | Link #1900 | ||
Aspiring Aspirer
|
Quote:
What's your thoughts on this? Quote:
__________________
|
||
Tags |
current affairs, discussion, international |
|
|