2013-05-22, 01:10 | Link #321 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Actually the game seems to be slated for release on PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox360 AND Xbox One. So the 360 and PS3 version may come out on that date while the PS4 and Xbobx One version will come out later... the sad thing is that one of the few games they DID take time to talk about was call of duty and its not even an exclusive; not even exclusive to the next gen. Xbox just get the DLC sooner. What a huge loss to non-xbox gamers...
__________________
|
2013-05-22, 02:34 | Link #323 | |
Pretentious moe scholar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 37
|
Quote:
If they become the distribution platform, than the scheme they propose is actually pretty generous - Steam doesn't exactly allow sub accounts or resales as Microsoft seems to suggest their system does. But I have the feeling this isn't where they're going just yet - the console business seems to be more conservative than the PC business in this regard.
__________________
|
|
2013-05-22, 05:36 | Link #325 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 41
|
Yeah I know it is kotaku, but i find this article (not sure if you call it that) funny, Here's What People in Japan Think of Xbox One
Quote:
|
|
2013-05-22, 06:01 | Link #326 | |||||||
Lets be reality
Join Date: May 2007
|
Horrible name, should've gone with Xbox Infinity or Xbox Next or heck even just Xbox. Xbox One just sounds shit.
Also Cerny's ps4 speech shitted on these, best "talking head" in the industry, and he's a genius programmer/designer as well. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And another thing that doesn't change is that the Wii U is performing worse than the Dreamcast did, and it's not like it has a fantastic library too boot. Quote:
Hahaha, no. When vgleaks leaked the specs for the ps4 and 360 and was vindicated with the ps4 (except for the last minute addition of gddr ram) 360 fanboys were saying the specs will change blah blah. People with logic said at this current point of time it's too late. Guess which side was right? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Can people who don't know why the industry crashed in the first place stop repeating this like a stupid meme? Like somehow Square Enix having stupid expectations for their Western games is the equivalent of burying millions and millions of copies of E.T in a landfill. Or that 3 console makers is too much when the last generation had the most consoles sold it in period. They are nothing alike period Also the "most powerful console has never won" meme going around is just as stupid, facts are the PS4 is not going to be that far off in price to the Wii U and the... "One" because the latter two have failed in their ability to come in at a cheaper price point due to the Tablet and Kinect 2.0 respectively. Sony have ignored gimmicks to focus on making the console the best it can be for it's price hardware wise. Anyway back to the point. Snes > Genesis (yeah like a Neogeo home arcade console with expensive as shit games was a real competitor, foh) psx being more powerful than the 3do and saturn definitely helped it, and while the n64 was stronger it had limitations due to carts, and perception is everything, look @ the tv ads for FF7 back in the day, all FMV scenes. The average person watching PSX or N64 ads on tv would assume the psx is more powerful. Also 3rd parties were massive.... Ps2 crushed the Dreamcast by being more powerful, xbox was a new "American" console in a time where Japanese games ruled the charts. Gamecube was too late and the Nintendo is for kids backlash was in full effect, dat lunchbox design didn't help. Wii won thanks to Wii Sports being a gateway drug, but Nintendo thinking that audience would come back for the Wii U was a massive mistake. The HD twins are easily the best performing non winners in a console war.... by themselves they both outsell the 2nd and 3rd place consoles from the previous 2 gens combined. |
|||||||
2013-05-22, 06:18 | Link #327 |
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Right behind you.
Age: 35
|
I'm not buying it. I wouldn't play it if Microsoft gave me one for free. It's all about making money for them, and has nothing to do with gaming. EA no longer has online passes? What a fucking red herring to distract us while Microsoft pulls this shit.
These kind of borderline-unethical practices are turning the entire industry into a goddamn joke. I was already dubious about the PS4, but it's looking a WHOLE LOT BETTER than the Xbox One right about now. That being said, I'm going to stick to PC games. I don't understand why anyone would buy an Xbox at this point when the Xbox is essentially turning into an inferior version of a PC anyway. At least on the PC you get to maximize/minimize your graphics options to optimize your performance settings.
__________________
|
2013-05-22, 06:24 | Link #328 | ||
Lets be reality
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2013-05-22, 06:37 | Link #329 |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Simple. Next time you want to buy a new PC, simply add 400 dollars extra to your budget. No one is ever going to buy a PC JUST for games, but if you think of the extra money as what you normally spend on a console, it isn't much at all.
__________________
|
2013-05-22, 06:40 | Link #330 | |
Le fou, c'est moi
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Age: 34
|
Quote:
It works with HTC because they had previous devices called One (Nexus One, HTC One X, etc.), but the Xbox? Yeah no. As for me, my one and only love is a powerful desktop PC. And not that $1600 nonsense (that would be when I want a 500GB SSD in the thing or something), even $800 is pretty powerful these days. |
|
2013-05-22, 06:56 | Link #331 |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
The silly thing is, after all the fuss about the TV features of the Xbox 1... It is NOT available out of the box!
You actually had to BUY a peripheral in order to connect your Xbox1 to the TV. WHY? When they forced the new Kinect to be mandatory with ever console, why are they trying to sell the TV function separately? http://www.vg247.com/2013/05/21/xbox...parate-device/ Unrelated: All things considered, I am actually impressed with the Kinect 2. And I look forward to seeing what the jail-breakers would do with it in revolutionising technology. I just don't think it would do any good as a gaming device.
__________________
Last edited by Vallen Chaos Valiant; 2013-05-22 at 07:13. |
2013-05-22, 07:11 | Link #332 | |
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Right behind you.
Age: 35
|
Quote:
You're forgetting all those fees you'll be paying. Or the prices for new games. One or the other. So you'll be paying something like at least $40-$60 for games, since remember, you're getting charged a fee for used games as well. Don't forget the fee for XBOX Live, either. Whereas I can buy a game for sometimes as low as $20-30 on Steam if I get a good sale. Since I no longer play games with subscription fees (I still love Guild Wars 2), I buy a game once then I'm done. Sure, I have to have an online pass with discs I buy from a store, but that's always been the case with PC. PC users just deal with it. Also, if I need to update, I don't need to buy a whole new PC. I only have to crack open the case and change my graphics card. Sure, they can be expensive (depending on what you're willing to spend), but the quality is what you choose, not what you're given. The online passes for games on consoles is ridiculous and anyone that just swallows it without protest deserves to be paying extra. If I get a new console (which I doubt), it will be without question the PS4. I actually don't own a PS3, and I love my XBOX 360, but there's just no way I would get an XBOX One when the PS4 is better in almost every way. Literally, name a feature and PS4 probably beats it. Oh, right. PS4 doesn't have a hands-free remote control for the television. WHOOP-DEE-DOO. Who cares? And for proof that I'm not talking out my ass: http://kotaku.com/you-will-be-able-t...cros-509140825 ^Way to screw over GameStop, Microsoft. They are one of your biggest supporting companies because people could freely trade games. Now that we can't share or rent, a lot of people aren't going to blindly buy games they've never tried. At least I certainly don't, and never have. That's actually going to cause a net loss for everybody in the end... the gamer, GameStop, and Microsoft, too. http://kotaku.com/xbox-one-does-requ...ay-o-509164109 ^Great! So if my internet goes out for any reason I can't play. Awesome. just what I always wanted. /Sarcasm http://www.polygon.com/2013/5/21/435...r-offline-play ^Seriously? http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/...e-us-at-launch ^Frankly I don't care either way about this pointless remoteless television controller. If anything, it detracts from the overall selling points because it further shows how generalized the XBOX is getting, rather than being gamer-centric which WAS the XBOX's greatest strength... up until now, apparently. On the other hand, PS4 is gearing up to be gamer-centric, so hats-off to them for at least having a better general idea of what GAMERS want. But the idea of having to purchase additional peripherals to support something that should come with the console out-of-the-box (assuming you don't get to right at launch) is infuriating, given that this is one of the new XBOX's touted new features. Given how the new XBOX One has naught to show in terms of innovation, there's no reason to buy it. If I'm going to spend an exorbitant amount of money on something, I'd rather buy something crazy like the Oculus Rift.
__________________
|
|
2013-05-22, 07:53 | Link #334 |
Riding the Ange Express
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sunriseland
|
Westlo The amount of money these games cost to create can be incredibly high. Not just Square Enix having stupid expectations. Companies like EA, Activision, Capcom. Look at THQ going backrupt. So I was referring to big budgets increasing more and more.
__________________
|
2013-05-22, 08:04 | Link #335 | |
WE ARE.... PENN STATE....
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2013-05-22, 08:26 | Link #336 |
A Proud Lolicon
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In front of my computer
Age: 36
|
Isn't it just because of the absurd marketing cost? When the budget for marketing is higher than the cost of the game itself, you should know something is definitely wrong here.
__________________
|
2013-05-22, 09:09 | Link #337 |
Many RPGs, Little Time
|
While the media stuff is necessarialy useless for most gamers, what were we expecting in this gen regarding games?
Aside from better graphics, there's nothing really impressive to look forward to now. In the past gen, High Definition made a huge difference and was the selling point. That's probably the reason of why they're compensating the lack of gaming appeal, with all those non-gaming features. Can't feel or see any improvement in games, honestly.
__________________
|
2013-05-22, 09:17 | Link #338 | |
Meh
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
2013-05-22, 09:21 | Link #339 | |
We're Back
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Redgrave City
Age: 35
|
Quote:
I would like 60 FPS for every game please. Even those that don't need it! Like Atelier! Give Atelier 60 FPS !
__________________
|
|
2013-05-22, 09:28 | Link #340 |
Mmmm....
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I think a lot of this is going to come down to specification and price.
The XBox One may have a slightly lower specification that the PS4 (depending on CPU and GPU speeds?) but can it undercut it significantly enough on price? How much money can Microsoft lose to try and capture market share above Sony? Because they do seem much of a muchness, and we've not really seen the PS4 yet. Certainly I've not heard anything that makes me want to buy one. No Microsoft, I do not want to control my television by waving my arms around and shouting at it, I have a perfectly functional remote control unit with buttons on it that give me all the control I need. I suspect most of this functionality will never really work properly outside of the US, anyhow. The thing that first appealed to me about consoles was that you bought a game, put it in the console, and started playing. But those days are over, even in the current generation (more with PS3 than XBox 360) you need to go and make some tea while waiting for the game to install, then maybe wait a bit more for updates to download and install, and it could be half an hour before you can actually start playing. It's as bad as the old PC days when you had to handcraft your CONFIG.SYS file for each game you bought! (DR-DOS 5 was best for that, anyone remember?) I think I'd much rather have one machine that plays games and does it well without any messing, than something like the XBox One which is trying to be too many things at once and won't do any of them as well. But I do think it will come down to pricing, the cheaper machine could get more market share. On the subject of specs, this article suggests the PS4 scores more here. Last edited by Dop; 2013-05-22 at 09:47. Reason: added link to spec. review |
Thread Tools | |
|
|