2010-12-27, 21:00 | Link #2101 | |
Somehow I found out
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 40
|
Quote:
Personally (although I haven't taken a close look at the numbers), it kinda feels like I've become a tad more lenient the more I've written. I look back at some of my older reviews and feel like, occasionally, I was too harsh. Yes, some critics become jaded with time. But to make the assumption that all do is aggravating. It becomes hard to imagine what points a reviewer could make that you could recognize as valid or reasonable, except those that directly agree with your already established opinion. If you want to discuss or dispute specific points raised in a given review, then that's fine, because those can be discussed or argued about. But to dismiss an opinion out of hand because of the background of the person who raised it... well, that's just an ad hominem, and simply limits any chance of discussion, any opportunity to have an exchange of ideas, or to widen perspectives from either point of view.
__________________
|
|
2010-12-27, 21:43 | Link #2102 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
Hmmm. I didn't know professional reviewers frequented this forum. Quite the surprise. I have to apologize, though, because I never read anyone's review of anything--books, anime, what-have-you--because I know it won't suit my biased attitude and will only make me more aggressive in defending the show. All reviewers are biased, but that's because everyone is. To be biased means to hold certain things more important than others, and if you can find someone who treats everything in the world equally, then tip of the cap.
So unfortunately, I can't comment on the above-mentioned review, but I do hope at least some reviewers thought positively of the show. The chances of this show ever getting an R1 release are slim-to-none, but if some critics enjoyed it, that means the people of-like-minds who follow the critics will enjoy it, and maybe the chances will be closer to slim than none. I personally enjoyed the omnibus format because it was new to me. I usually wind up cheering for the wrong girl in harem series, so when a series has every pairing, it's easier to withstand. Of course, I do feel sorry for Kozue, but apparently the player couldn't "win" her story route, so there's no helping it. |
2010-12-27, 22:01 | Link #2103 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
I hope we can keep the discussion here to the show itself. A debate about reviewing and reviewers is not on-topic in this thread.
__________________
|
|
2010-12-27, 22:06 | Link #2104 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
There I thought I was being all careful, partially blaming my own inexperienced self. Guess not.
I didn't just start out simply dismissing every professional reviewer, "because". But after having seen more than enough overly vicious vitriol about subtle plot points that supposedly ruin completely an otherwise beautiful piece of work to last me a lifetime, yeah you could say I've become a bit distrustful of people who do this kind of thing for a living (or otherwise do it a lot). Call it generalization if you want. It's not like I don't consider every point, I just weigh along our obvious differences. Is that really wrong? Anyway, I suppose this is indeed getting a bit off topic. Sorry for still posting this, relentlessflame, I was typing before you made your post. :x |
2010-12-27, 22:13 | Link #2105 |
Somehow I found out
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 40
|
Well, I can't speak for other sites, but we're not professional, and never have been. No one who writes for our site gets paid, and the site generates a humongous $0.00 annually from ad revenue. I can't speak for others, but I write because I'm passionate about the anime I watch.
Oh, and so I'm not completely off topic, there are some aspects of Yosuga no Sora that I really liked (such as that beautiful soundtrack) and while I approve of it for having the audacity to show such brazen sex scenes, I thought some of the arcs, particularly the latter ones, relied far too heavily on them. Nao's arc especially was pretty much only held together because of the sex. Take the sex out and it would have fallen apart, which I think is a fairly cheap way to tell a story. The sex scenes themselves were of varying quality too. Migiwa's scene was about as "appropriate" (relatively speaking) as it could have been, but Akira's scenes were just cringe-worthy (especially the whole "squeeze" stuff... they couldn't have made the scene more awkward). The fact of the matter is, if you pack your story with excessive, gratuitous sex, you've got work to do to justify why it's there, other than cheap titillation. You just need to have a look at the massive drop rates this show had from people repulsed by the excessiveness of the sex. The fact that Yosuga no Sora almost, almost managed to lift itself above the limitations it set on itself by taking such a trashy course is, in my eyes, something of a miraculous accident rather than a result of intent. At the very least, it executed the omnibus format much better than Amagami did, where the resets between arcs were just way too harsh, and the intention was much more transparent.
__________________
|
2010-12-27, 22:32 | Link #2106 |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Nothing about this show was accidental. The careful symbolism and cleverness of the dialog (at least in most of the episodes) show clear signs of intent. If you can get over your idea of "trashiness", I think the show is a lot more carefully-planned and artfully-constructed than you're giving it credit for. As with eroge as a medium, most people tend to struggle with the "balance" between sexually-explicit scenes and "serious content", and consider them to be at fundamental odds with each other at some level (even anime as a medium has traditionally been divided into "clean" and "hentai", further reinforcing that divide). So when a show tries to blend them as this one did, I expect it to be polarizing. There probably aren't enough examples of other shows that have attempted this blend for people to establish their expectations (but at least there's one such example now, for better or worse).
__________________
|
2010-12-27, 22:34 | Link #2107 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Virgo Supercluster, Milky Way, Orion Arm, Sol, Earth, Taiwan
Age: 38
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-12-27, 22:47 | Link #2108 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
Like I've mentioned, I for one started off this series actually expecting a cheap ecchi thrill. And then I got hit by this incredible audiovisual atmosphere coupled with a serious plot that really hit a chord with me. Completely forgot about the ecchi part. When it got to the first sex scene, my reaction went along the lines of "oh right, sex too. Yay." Sure, not all of them were completely relevant to the plot, but it's not as if they always are, in real life. At least they happened where you'd expect them to.
|
2010-12-27, 22:49 | Link #2109 |
Yuuki Aoi
Join Date: Jul 2004
|
Thanks to Ascaloth for posting the link to his intelligent review, with which I disagree substantially. I do agree about the good visual aspect of the show. And I too would rather have got more story and less omake. But I think the storytelling is also good, and almost all the sex works. I think of this as one of the best shows of the year, and more an 8 or 9 than a five.
For me, this is a new way of adapting an erogame. That makes it interesting, at the very least. Clearly, the plot evolves much more quickly than usual, but I never felt it went faster than I could keep up with, and the emotions and personalities developed reasonably, for me. In fact, now that I am used to this pace, other shows can seem glacial. Haru didn't seem inconsistent to me. He was a kind and capable guy who liked women and was desperate to divert his feelings for his twin. In fact, the main characters all had real feelings that reached me. It's certainly true that the inclusion of so much sex was carefully calculated to appeal to a particular audience, but that doesn't make it all immoral and beneath notice. I don't think of sex as dirty, so I would never describe those scenes as "trashy." It's reasonable to discuss whether they are integral to the plot, and there are some cases that can be debated. But would we say the same about a kiss or an embrace? The sex scenes were part of the expression of love, it seems to me, and all worked for me except the scene with Nao at the festival (but even that showed Haru's lust and desperation). This is hardly a show to display for a general audience, but here among friends, I see it as something fascinating and new. What I look for in all drama is characters that make sense, with whom I can sympathize, and who have strong emotions that I can feel. This show provided all of that. It is hardly War and Peace, but it seems to me an excellent anime drama.
__________________
|
2010-12-28, 01:49 | Link #2110 | |||
I don't give a damn, dude
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In Despair
Age: 37
|
Quote:
Three words for you: Pot. Kettle. Black. Quote:
The way I see it, Yosuga no Sora played out much too alike to an actual visual novel, since its take on the omnibus format emphasizes the consequences of different choices and circumstances. However, once you do it this way, I'm just left thinking, "why don't I just go play the game to begin with?". It's almost as if this is not so much an adaptation, as it is an rehash and/or an advertisement of the story routes. Which brings us to the question of the purpose to the omnibus format in the first place; if not out of lack of interest in adapting the VN's disparate routes into a coherent story suitable for the anime format, then what? Kazuha's and Akira's stories could more or less be put together as one whole story, given their related nature. Nao's and Sora's, perhaps not so much, but still possible to an extent. Why didn't they do so to save time, time which can be used to develop the story further? I can only see one other reason for this; to give every girl their time in the sexual limelight, as well as perhaps avoiding any semblance of a shipping war. Like I did already mention in my review, some of the sex scenes (by which I meant some of Nao's and Sora's) were plot-critical and had their place, but the rest....not so much. It certainly didn't help that the sex scenes themselves was explicitly soft porn, either; I'm pretty certain there are more tasteful ways of rendering sex scenes than humongous honkers, "squeezing" and outdoors yukata. You want to tell me those are anything more than titillation material? Yes, Yosuga's take on the omnibus is a different approach, but it feels uninspired and uncreative to me. Quote:
Okay, so let's say for the sake of argument, that Haruka is indeed pursuing other girls to get his mind off Sora. What does that say about Haruka? I'd actually feel sorry for the other girls, knowing they're just getting used. And really, it's also Sora as well. She's consistent in the sense that we get a jealous vibe from her pretty much in any arc, but why does she pull the seductress act only in her own route? It's hard to buy such a sexual approach from a character who had only resorted to jealous looks before. Again, might not be much of an issue in the Kazuha/Akira side of the story, but what stopped her from pulling the same in Nao's arc, where she arguably has the motivation to do so? What's the deal with her? I can see what this series is trying to do. It's the execution I mostly have an issue with. |
|||
2010-12-28, 02:49 | Link #2111 | |||||||
My Lovely Bunny Chie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philippines
Age: 35
|
That's gotta hurt.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||||
2010-12-28, 05:42 | Link #2112 |
Hen-Tie
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hen-Tie pen
|
No offense to Ascaloth and entire Nihon Review team but I expect much lower score from them. Giving it 5 out of 10 is the biggest surprise to me since I already saw how they hate this show in their forums. I also expect them to give Amagami SS better score since it lacked of sex and nudity(well there still lots of sexual innuendos and implied sexual relationship between hero and the girls but they aren't count) and instead it ends up getting same score is the big surprise.
To Ascaloth, this is not a sarcasm but rather my description of how surprise I am to see your review. |
2010-12-28, 06:28 | Link #2113 | |
I don't give a damn, dude
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In Despair
Age: 37
|
Quote:
Since that's the case, I guess I'm going to have to qualify the rating. Yosuga no Sora has some impressive visuals and BGM, make no mistake about it. I'm real big on that; if any romance drama have audiovisuals which can compare favourably with the industry standards set by KyoAni and P.A. Works, I'll give major props for it. Individually, the premises of the story arcs (save perhaps Nao's) aren't half bad, either. I have a lot of issues with it, but I'll give credit where it is due, so a 5 it is. As for Amagami, that's Sorrow's, so I'll let him defend his rating in the appropriate thread. |
|
2010-12-28, 07:59 | Link #2114 | |
Kana Hanazawa ♥
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: France
Age: 37
|
Quote:
As for Akira and Kazuha's sex scenes, even though I agree they were utterly useless, I don't think they were detrimental to the plot. It was an easy, quick and pleasing to the eye way of showing us they became very intimate. I didn't find those scenes vulgar or distasteful, Akira's was even pretty cute (and funny). Furthermore, They lasted a grand total of what, 1 minute? You might as well complain about the omake ED taking up one minute and a half of each episode.
__________________
|
|
2010-12-28, 12:01 | Link #2115 | |
house music addict
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-12-28, 12:35 | Link #2116 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
And Ascaloth, you were clearly provoking him as well, so take it easy. Let's stick to the arguments and avoid the theatrics.
__________________
|
|
2010-12-28, 14:07 | Link #2117 |
Last Engage
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Florida
|
But this calls to mind the world building element that a unified format provides. Sure, there are many stories, but they all take place in the same universe, and reveal different elements of the characters. One watching, say, Nao's route wouldn't know as much about Akira or about Haru's relationship dynamics with her. After all, what is a story but the sum of the dynamics of its cast - all its cast? A fuller picture of the universe can be obtained by taking everything in. Calling the others a "waste of time" does a disservice to any story, fragmented or otherwise.
|
2010-12-28, 14:13 | Link #2118 | |
Yuuki Aoi
Join Date: Jul 2004
|
Quote:
To me, Haru is the same guy in all routes, but the events of each route do not and should not affect each other. That is part of the skill of the adaptation. What I see is a Haru who responds to his new environment in four slightly different ways, each of which constitutes one route. He is still Haru, but time and chance lead him to one of four partners. Same with Sora. In the other routes, she restrained herself and/or did not know how to go about getting Haru for her own. In her own route, she solved these problems. I don't see what's wrong with that. The fact that he is running away from Sora toward these other girls is a very interesting part of the drama. Sure, it's not fair to them. So what? It makes for good drama. I can feel sorry for them, or upset with Haru, but that has no bearing whatsoever on the quality of the anime. In fact, it raises it to a higher level of psychology and realism, in my opinion. I don't think the fact that he is subconsciously running from Sora devalues much what he is feeling for the others. Love on the rebound is common in real life. He really feels something for them. But there is a larger feeling lurking there for Sora that will overwhelm his feelings for any of the others when it rises to the front of his consciousness. I understand the feeling that the sex is tacked on and unnecessary, but besides just enjoying those scenes for themselves, I felt as if they put the seal on Haru's feelings for each girl. It is really only custom that makes us accept a kiss as a sign of love, but think of the act of love itself as something obscene. It is just as reasonable to think any show that does not get as far as sex is hiding important aspects of a relationship. In any case, thanks for the opportunity to think about why I liked this show. Your arguments make sense on their own terms. I just don't happen to feel the same way.
__________________
|
|
2010-12-28, 15:52 | Link #2120 |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kobe, Japan
|
I agree that Haru did not obviously act as though was using the first two girls as a substitute for Sora - he seemed sincere in his feelings for them to me as well. Obviously there was a quantum shift in the Nao arc. While Haru still seemed to genuinely love her in that arc, it was clear than everything that happened between Haru, Sora and Nao was interconnected. In a sense, the first two arcs seemed disconnected from the rest of the series to me.
__________________
|
Tags |
drama, eroge, romance, seinen, visual novel adaptation |
Thread Tools | |
|
|