2010-11-23, 04:08 | Link #9941 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 41
|
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by killer3000ad; 2010-11-23 at 04:18. |
|
2010-11-23, 04:14 | Link #9942 |
books-eater youkai
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Betweem wisdom and insanity
|
Australia commits to rare earths supply to Japan
http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNew...6AM1BF20101123
__________________
|
2010-11-23, 05:58 | Link #9945 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
And since China provides 97% of the world's rare metals, you might want to reassess your statement with regards to "large reserve" and geographic landmasses; providing the entire world with a monopoly of such a resource means the land is rich in it, and that has something got to do with geography and natural occurrence of the resource, not politics. And threaten the world's kimchi supply.
__________________
|
|
2010-11-23, 06:10 | Link #9946 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Germany also said it will help out Japan in October: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori...087529/1/.html |
|
2010-11-23, 06:43 | Link #9948 |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
They always have been. It is just that their leaning mountain (kao shan in Chinese) is a superpower now, and they dared to fool around and act big knowing that China will clean up the mess for them.
I certainly wish China don't. Seriously, now everyone has nukes and you want to start WWIII?
__________________
|
2010-11-23, 07:12 | Link #9949 | |
Zetsubou gunsou
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Switzerland
Age: 43
|
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news...123-185qh.html
Quote:
Note that it's not the first serious incident happening there. A naval clash with North Korean casualties occurred just over a year ago: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111203773.html |
|
2010-11-23, 07:14 | Link #9950 |
Chiyo IQ, Osaka Aptitude
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Age: 39
|
I'm surprised they've done such a thing really. It's like Burma really. Don't do anything at all and they could have been in power for years whilst being looked upon as quirky and delusional, but harmless, by everyone else.
Now they've guaranteed that their hold on NK will be a much shorter excursion than planned. They've ruined it for themselves now.
__________________
|
2010-11-23, 08:11 | Link #9951 | |
Moving in circles
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Singapore
Age: 49
|
Quote:
And he's likely doing it because he knows that North Korea can pretty much act with impunity. The last time war came to the northern part of the Korean peninsula, it ended badly for the largely American-led invasion, no thanks to the human-wave tactics of the People's Liberation Army of China. |
|
2010-11-23, 09:25 | Link #9952 | |
Chiyo IQ, Osaka Aptitude
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Age: 39
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-11-23, 09:45 | Link #9953 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Though I would say the dictatorship is better off gone. Crysis scenario anyone?
__________________
|
|
2010-11-23, 10:18 | Link #9954 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
On the other hand, I doubt the US is willing to engage militarily either. Its economy is not in good shape, and its army exhausted in other two wars. That's what Kim Jong Un is basing his calculation on. As long as this is limited to the island, he score point inside the North Korean army, the rest of the world will just pretend it never happened. Even if they do, what can they do about it? Negotiate with it? Put up more Sanctions? There is very little means for rest of the world to punish the north for such violation. The Chinese support for the North is just postponing the pain down the road. Nothing good is going to come out of it. The general opinion of North Korea government in China is that they are ungrateful bastards who bite the hand that feeds them. But they are strategically important because China does not want to see an American base on its boarder, and also the refugee problem if it collapse.
__________________
Last edited by Tom Bombadil; 2010-11-23 at 10:34. |
|
2010-11-23, 10:28 | Link #9956 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Besides, when is the last time the CIA carried out a proper HUMINT operation? My bets are Somalia in the mid-1990s.
__________________
|
|
2010-11-23, 10:33 | Link #9957 | ||
Moving in circles
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Singapore
Age: 49
|
Quote:
Quote:
Why else would it go so far as to acquire aircraft carriers if that plan is not already in the books? Agreed. |
||
2010-11-23, 10:57 | Link #9958 | |
Disabled By Request
|
Quote:
Yes, but as Kamui said, they're bound by treaty to intervene. And besides, the way I see it and considering the past, the US would jump at any chance to defend democracy from its classical enemies. And as I've said, there's been bad blood between China and the US recently. |
|
2010-11-23, 11:01 | Link #9959 | |
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
Quote:
2. stop any and all food aid sent to the North 3. fire as many missle/shells as teh NK did and pretend it never happen. 1 & 2 will hurt and cause more unrest which NK doesn't need more of at this point. And while China will make up the difference, it will at least hurt China's pocket books maintaining NK. 3. is tit for tat. what is the North going to do? invade? while China might let NK get away with certain things letting NK start a war that will drag China in isn't going tobe one of them.
__________________
|
|
2010-11-23, 11:23 | Link #9960 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Tags |
current affairs, discussion, international |
|
|