2010-08-08, 15:26 | Link #15561 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If they actually had gunshot wounds, they would have come out and said it! This red practically says they didn't have real gunshot wounds, just signs that resembled them. You say there's no way to tell which "dead" someone is. Sure, in that single sentence there isn't, but you're ignoring the whole rest of the game that has multiple hints and clues towards it. |
|
2010-08-08, 15:29 | Link #15562 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
There are no more than 18 people on this Rokkenjima Based on that, back on the day, several people would have thought that meat there were indeed 18 people. However, that's not what the Red is telling us. We're simply being told there are no more than 18, but we were never told the number couldn't be lower. You can also take into account all the Reds for Kanon's death in EP1. The scene itself leads you to believe he's dead, and the Red corners you into believing he couldn't have been killed. However, by working it out, you can easily deduce he was never killed. And there's a lot more.
__________________
|
|
2010-08-08, 15:34 | Link #15563 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-08-08, 15:37 | Link #15564 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
I'm pretty sure that only makes sense if your thinking about the coins as people. If you think about the cups as people and the coins as their souls it looks a little different because you have to put more than one coin inside the same cup to solve that one.
__________________
|
2010-08-08, 15:55 | Link #15565 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I think it makes much more sense if the actual number of coins is the actual number of real people, and the goal is to make it look like there are more coins than there actually are. You're supposed to place 5 coins so they look like 1+2+3. If you have to come up with what the cups represent, you could argue that the cups are supposed to be the various factions that exist, and coins within the same cup are "allied" together. I think it is already enough of a hint without that, though. |
|
2010-08-08, 16:04 | Link #15566 | ||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
do forgive me @Used Can yet again its dosnt counter what i said. after all the red rule of there are no more then 18 people on rokenjima is a rule to make us understand that there couldn't be more so that we can stop climb on that tree. and of course, ryukishi won't just say "there are actully 17 people on rokenjima, and by the way i 'lied' about kinzo hehehehe you fail for it" so fast in the game. what the point in a game where you have too much of hints and you can win it without even trying? its a game between you and ryukishi, ryukishi will help you a litile bit so that you wont be too wrong about it, but he isn't going to tell you the answer so fast. BTW i didn't thought about that posibility (kanon) i will read again the 1st EP (thenks for the intristing tip ) |
||
2010-08-08, 17:34 | Link #15567 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Floor eh duh?
|
Hey,I just thought of something interesting.
About the way George and Jessica fight. George uses precise moves in order to scare opponents and show them they certainly cannot win. Also had a power Gaap was impressed with,claiming he nearly had powers of a demon.(Clarify this) Jessica uses spammy moves until one of them hits,and when they do she keeps going and going showing complete determination that some miracle can occur. Ronove explained this is a power of humans that should be terrified.(Clarify this) It reminds me of red truth and blue truth. Right?George fights like he has the red,and Jessica with the blue. |
2010-08-08, 17:43 | Link #15568 | ||
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
Quote:
Quote:
In arc 4 and 6 Ronove was shown to seemingly respect Jessica and even calls her Milady. For some reason I never got much, I think it was in arc 3's intro, we're shown LD associated with Eva Beatrice. No problem there. The next frame is Ronove with Bernkastel. I'm probably just seeing too much. |
||
2010-08-08, 19:11 | Link #15569 |
I forgot.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere
Age: 32
|
This is a little off topic.
Uh, I don't know if this has been brought up before, but I'm still wondering who Gaap is equivalent to in the real world. I have 2 ideas. If Beato=Shannon, then Gaap=Jessica or Kanon If Beato=Jessica, Gaap=Shannon Maybe if we find everyone's meta-counterparts then the mystery will be easier? I'm just guessing here, feel free to shoot me down. |
2010-08-08, 19:16 | Link #15570 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
I don't think the representations make all that much of a difference. The only ones I think are important are Ronove and Virgilia since they're the ones who give Battler the most hints. The rest don't have to represent anybody because they make sense with or without it.
There have been speculations that Rosa = Gaap and this is based off different hints than Gaap's friendship status with Beatrice. (which may not even matter) That theory has more to do with what's said about Gaap's fashion sense and her taste in men. And the line "but only if he's hot!" However while some people still beleive these things need representations the thoughts on them so far have gone absolutely no where in terms of seeing any of the characters in a different way. It's an old theory that started with the stakes in episode 1 and 2 and IMO it's just a dead end. It also can get incredibly silly with certain characters.
__________________
|
2010-08-08, 19:26 | Link #15571 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
Small thought
I think an important mystery in Umineko is the meaning of furniture. I’ve seen many people saying that furniture are alternate identities, personalities or small people inside of a character, like some sort of bizarre DID. However, I thought that maybe they can be something less magical, like a róle, a pose, a role-playing character, a sockpuppet, a lie gone too far, a fake identity, or an actor in a play.
Based on this last idea, I had a thought: Spoiler for Acting:
Spoiler for Crackpot:
Spoiler for Theatrice:
Feel free to point all the holes here |
2010-08-08, 19:32 | Link #15572 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
There aren't any hints that the Fukuin house has anything to do with anything Theater related or that it's anything besides an orphanage... But I think you'd have an argument if you said Kinzo taught them to do that stuff to pull his pranks.
__________________
|
2010-08-08, 19:49 | Link #15573 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
Quote:
Good Idea! |
|
2010-08-08, 21:55 | Link #15575 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
There's also the notion of Kinzo's interest being a stage magic sort of thing. Acting of a different sort (Goldsmith the Magnificent, who summons scantily-clad bunnygirls and performs pitfall tricks), the possibility of the "dungeon" at Kuwadorian (if it exists) being a prop storage area, etc.
If this theory is even remotely close to explaining the "stage" background in ep7, it should be quite the shakeup. Oliver once suggested none of the characters we've seen are the actual Ushiromiyas, but actors who have been playing out "Rokkenjima stories" in an actual theater.
__________________
|
2010-08-08, 22:21 | Link #15576 |
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
Wait, does that means that the Ushiromiya doesn't even have to necessarily exists within Umineko's fiction? I guess it's been hinted that Rokkenjima appears on no maps even within it's own fiction.
That certainly would explain the absurd clothes of various characters. |
2010-08-08, 22:26 | Link #15577 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
You can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he said that because he thought the blonde could be an actor for Jessica with the stage background. However the backcover sort of suggests she/he's one of the 1986 characters.
__________________
|
2010-08-08, 22:32 | Link #15578 | |
Blick Winkel
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Gobbled up by Promathia
|
Quote:
Now I must say I did day the same thing to Author Theory (which was all but confirmed in EP6) and it disappointed me a bit, but I think any interpretations using the theater are completely unnecessary and obfuscate the purpose of the game: a murder mystery to be solved. I would rather not have to question the rules of the game. It would make the entire game arbitrary and not worth reading. This is a murder mystery, dammit, it's not supposed to be this complicated to find out how to begin to solve it, or even if the events I'm trying to be solving even happened. I enjoy the surrealism in the series as it is, too much more will be too confusing. Now I cannot say I know why Nanjo was in a theater in that screenshot, unless he was preparing Jessica's school's festival in EP2 I'm sorry if I sound rude; that is not my intention. It certainly is fun to think up interpretations like this, but if it were true we would have a play based on fallacious message bottles based off of a series of events that may not have even occured. |
|
2010-08-08, 22:38 | Link #15579 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Well by calling herself the witch of Theatergoing I think Featherine is making it very clear that she believes she's a spectator watching from a distance. Like watching a performance at the opera with binoculars.
__________________
|
2010-08-08, 22:45 | Link #15580 | |
Blick Winkel
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Gobbled up by Promathia
|
Quote:
But I do not think the events that we are shown on Rokkenjima are fake just because of this. |
|
|
|