2010-10-26, 23:52 | Link #1 |
Retweet Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ニュー・オーリンズ、LA
|
Cellphone found in the 1920's???
Ok this may be silly or it might be one of the greatest discoveries ever...Ever since I discovered this at work today I've been having heated debates with people over what's going on in this clip...Apparently in 1928 stock-footage taken from a Charlie Chaplin movie it appears that a "woman" is talking on a "cellphone" ...
Now I thought this would be so obviously bad that it would be easy to discredit but as I showed people the clip and we all debated it, the opinions were varied and evenly split down the middle on what is happening here... I personally believe that is a man or alien in 1920's clothing talking on some sort of communication device...The reason I don't think this is fake is because it's so non-descript and so not obvious in the way it is captured...If you look at the very end of the part where the woman is talking before it fades out, you can CLEARLY see that this "thing" is having a conversation with someone in tone... So decide for yourself, I've included the clip by itself and the filmmaker who discovered it and was so shocked by it he had to show it to various audiences...And before you say it WE KNOW THAT CELL TOWERS CAN'T BE IN 1928, but the word "cellphone" is merely used for context...It may just be a communication device between and alien and it's ship or a time-traveler (Which is what the filmmaker believes)...Again, look at the "woman's" feet if you have a chance...That's not a human foot IMO and if it is it's someone (or thing) in disguise...Have a open-mind and please discuss without completely dismissing...
__________________
|
2010-10-27, 00:41 | Link #2 |
Disabled By Request
|
I don't think she was holding a cell phone. She doesn't seem to be holding anything at all as a matter of fact. She might've easily been trying to fix a wad of hair or her earring. Her hand is crunched up too small to be holding a cell phone, even if you're talking about one of those small baby phones people have. And if you look really carefully, you can't see anything inside her hand either. Half her fingers are almost touching the palm of her hand while the other two are over her ear. I think people are just making too big a deal out of this...
|
2010-10-27, 01:51 | Link #3 | |
Senior Guest
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Athens (GMT+2)
Age: 35
|
^ The first mobiles were the size of your flipflops, hand-sized gadgets came out around the new millenium.
Quote:
|
|
2010-10-27, 03:03 | Link #5 | |
Disabled By Request
|
Quote:
I don't think such an idea even existed until long after. Back then, people hardly imagined phones that could be carried in your pocket and if they did, they wouldn't think they would be that small yet. I would expect phones were imagined to be in a cruved shape and two round beams on either side for to send and receive transmission respectively. |
|
2010-10-27, 03:57 | Link #10 |
Disabled By Request
|
From the point of view of a director, what she did was of little to no importance because it was just stock footage of bg characters that had no effect on the plot itself. The fact that it's stock footage is enough evidence of that already. They could be allowed to do anything so long as it looked relatively normal and didn't catch the eye for particular reason. Actions like that wouldn't gain anyone's attention unless she really was holding a cell phone or something that remotely looked like one. If that were the case, however, I think people back then would've been in an uproar for such a device to exist in that person's hand. That being said, the director wouldn't have complained or told her to do something different. She was there just to make an appearance, which is exactly what she did.
|
2010-10-27, 09:32 | Link #13 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
And they are the size of bricks.
__________________
|
|
2010-10-27, 10:01 | Link #16 | |
Wiggle Your Big Toe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Age: 33
|
No way is that a cell phone, it is definitely (in my opinion) a Siemens carbon hearing aide.
They were invented in 1924 and were held like phones. Quote:
As for her strange feet, I really don't see what is so alien like about them. So she has big feet (I guess women back then didn't?) or she is just wearing shoes that are a bit big for her.
__________________
Last edited by GuidoHunter_Toki; 2010-10-27 at 10:16. |
|
2010-10-27, 10:27 | Link #17 | |
Disabled By Request
|
Quote:
Either way, she's not an alien or a time traveller |
|
2010-10-27, 10:38 | Link #18 | |
Retweet Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ニュー・オーリンズ、LA
|
Quote:
A random, creepishly oversized old lady with size 14 feet casually, if not matter-of-factly talking into a device while strolling in-front of a B-roll set up she may or may not known existed…There’s something so weird, yet unassuming about it, which is why many people are debating it and find the easy solution to be not so easy at all…
__________________
|
|
2010-10-27, 10:44 | Link #19 |
Aria Company
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
That doesn't rule out her being an esper or a slider though.
Seriously though, why do some people always go for the most bizarre explanation. "There's a woman holding something in a old movie. She must be a time traveler!" "There's a light in the sky. It must be aliens!" There's a thousand possible explanations that are more likely. It's a hearing aid. It's some sort of heating pad thing. She's an inventor and it's some kind of device she made. It's a shadow. She's just weird. Many more that I can't think of off the top of my head All vastly more likely than time travel. Though my trap sense is tingling there. Those feet and hands seem rather large for a woman.
__________________
|
2010-10-27, 10:47 | Link #20 | |
Wiggle Your Big Toe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Age: 33
|
Quote:
Still I always love reading people's other wordly and conspiratorial like explanations for things in this world. Some can be quite intricate and imaginative.
__________________
|
|
|
|