AnimeSuki Forums

Tenken · 2004-06-10, 21:14

I couldn't resist when I saw the Naruto 87 BT up, but who is akusei?

Are they any good? I guess I will find it out shortly...

airfeel · 2004-06-11, 00:17

Quote:

I couldn't resist when I saw the Naruto 87 BT up, but who is akusei? Are they any good? I guess I will find it out shortly...

hmm.. who knows? but i doubt the quality will be any good.. the file size.. isn't it too small to produce good quality image..

anyway.. where should also thank them for subbing the episode..

killusuka · 2004-06-11, 19:46

low file size doesnt necessarliy means a bad file all the time...just so you know, a file could be smaller than the other one but it could have the same quality with proper encoding...dont just assume..try it first b4 u say its might be a bad file..

anwyays i did d/l it and i must say the quality is decent to good...its about a notch lower than anbu&AonE when it comes to graphics...the subs makes sense so it is at all bad.

YRP Nova · 2004-06-12, 23:31

Just as I expected, another quick but poor quality group. I'm sticking with Shin-Otaku now because they come out with the second best quality but quicker than anbu&anoe.

Kage Bunshin · 2004-06-13, 01:15

They did a great job actually!

Personally i thought the video encoding was very impressive considering the size of the file was 110mb.

I don't speak japanese, but i've heard they did a great translation as well. Overall its similar to bakafish, but with better video quality.

Anyway they are joining with shin-otaku, which should be great

fuzi0n · 2004-06-17, 16:46

No one beats Anbu-AonE nor TW so I don't settle for any other, speed subbers... suck, especially if there are alot of speed subbers on one single series. TBH, I'd rather watch RAWs than watch Naruto subbed in 1 hour ^^

2004-06-10, 21:14	Link #1
Tenken Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Charleston, SC Age: 39	akusei any good? I couldn't resist when I saw the Naruto 87 BT up, but who is akusei? Are they any good? I guess I will find it out shortly...

2004-06-11, 19:46	Link #3
killusuka the one you wish you were Join Date: May 2004 Location: winter-peg, mani-snow-ba Age: 39	low file size doesnt necessarliy means a bad file all the time...just so you know, a file could be smaller than the other one but it could have the same quality with proper encoding...dont just assume..try it first b4 u say its might be a bad file.. anwyays i did d/l it and i must say the quality is decent to good...its about a notch lower than anbu&AonE when it comes to graphics...the subs makes sense so it is at all bad.

2004-06-12, 23:31	Link #4
YRP Nova Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2004	Just as I expected, another quick but poor quality group. I'm sticking with Shin-Otaku now because they come out with the second best quality but quicker than anbu&anoe.

2004-06-13, 01:15	Link #5
Kage Bunshin Merely a shadow... Join Date: Jun 2004	They did a great job actually! Personally i thought the video encoding was very impressive considering the size of the file was 110mb. I don't speak japanese, but i've heard they did a great translation as well. Overall its similar to bakafish, but with better video quality. Anyway they are joining with shin-otaku, which should be great

2004-06-17, 16:46	Link #6
fuzi0n Anime-Faith K-Timer & QC Join Date: May 2004	No one beats Anbu-AonE nor TW so I don't settle for any other, speed subbers... suck, especially if there are alot of speed subbers on one single series. TBH, I'd rather watch RAWs than watch Naruto subbed in 1 hour ^^