2010-07-15, 18:49 | Link #13941 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
Quote:
He loses his fully objective viewpoint, then suddenly he starts seeing them together rather a lot. Interesting...? |
|
2010-07-15, 18:50 | Link #13942 |
阿賀野型3番艦、矢矧 Lv180
Graphic Designer
Moderator Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Belgium, Brussels
Age: 37
|
Involving the new detective in the lot at that given scene. Things wouldn't have been that complicated if Erika wasn't in the same room.
I believe both sides plenty discussed about this issue previously.
__________________
|
2010-07-15, 18:52 | Link #13943 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
At the very least, I'll guarantee that it was intentional. He was either using that scene to make us falsely believe in Shkanon or to help us find the right answer. There can be no doubt of that.
__________________
|
2010-07-15, 19:01 | Link #13944 | |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Quote:
Ryukishi said that episode 6 gives an almost definite answer on Battler's sin and that quick readers will figure it out in episode 4. So that's one of the major points of this episode I suppose. The other important thing is connecting the backstory in this episode with the statements of characters in past episodes.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-15, 19:08 | Link #13945 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
A thought someone put before me recently:
Many people considered ep2 to be one of the weaker episodes. ep2 focused on the Shannon/George Kanon/Jessica stuff. ep2 focused a lot on overt magical battles. And now we have ep6, with a lot of overt magical battles and a focus on Shannon/George and Kanon/Jessica. And a lot of people consider it one of the worst episodes. So inasmuch as ep5 was sort of an ep1 parallel (with the emphasis on Natsuhi and being more "real"), ep6 is an ep2 parallel. So it might just be that he's emulating one of the least popular episodes, which will necessarily cause people to like it less. If people liked ep3 and ep4 more, it follows that ep7 and ep8 may also impress them. Of course that assumes ep7 will in fact parallel ep3 in some manner.
__________________
|
2010-07-15, 19:24 | Link #13947 | ||
It's Hammertime!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Italy (Neaples)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, on a side note, it may seems that i just want to deny that theory. It is not like that. Since ep6 points on Shkanon without doubt i just want to verify that this theory is at least acceptable since i've always doubted it before ep6. |
||
2010-07-15, 19:46 | Link #13948 |
ANTI-Nonsense
|
@Judoh:
Battler's Sin, is it now, manno? I admit I'm closer to those so-called idiot readers Featherine so despises, but it's mostly because I don't have much confidence in my theory on the subject. I imagine it has something to do with a broken promise, "Love", Mysterious Person X that Battler met long ago, and that kinda jazz. The import of which I understand, aesthetically, is an imperative to the tale, and forms the basis for many events that will or have occurred. But, still, I felt Episode 6's conclusion was really anticlimactic, after all these expectations I had built up from Episode 5 and previous episodes. Battler's still not getting off the island. Everyone still goes to the golden land (read: everyone dies). It's nuts. His motivation to get off the island way back when was Ange and those dear to him, but thanks to the answer he reached in Ep. 5, he doesn't seem to care about those goals anymore. In fact, he seemed content to spend the remainder of eternity in that crazy loop world of 1986, which totally bummed me out. Isn't the point to breakthrough the mystery of Rokkenjima in the year of October 1986? ...Wait, connecting the backstory in this episode with the statements of characters in past episodes? Hnnn, what other mysteries should I be focused on here? If it's Battler's birth, and I'll be real here, I think, we, the readers got trolled again. I'm convinced Ryukishi's not going to let us in the story until Episode 7 or the grand finale in 8. The identity of Mystery Baby X didn't get touched at all. Ange's conspiracy situation got a whole lot worse after this episode. The Universe must really hate her or something. Can't think of anything else Episode 6 could have helped with... @Renall: Wow, I never made that correlation. Great insight there on the fella who brought it up, man. Verily, I find myself agreeing that Episode 5 has quite a lot in common with Episode 1, although I don't recall Episode 2 having any overt magic battles, compared to the spectacular display in Episode 3 with the Virgilia versus Beatrice event.
__________________
|
2010-07-15, 20:27 | Link #13949 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
My suspicion is there are two things we need to solve. One is your traditional detective novel mystery stuff. How was this person killed, with what and how was this closed room constructed, etc. Actually, I think we're closing in on this stuff already with all the Fake First Twilight theories we've been hammering out here. However as stated in the episodes they've also been searching for 'The Culprit.' Rather than a traditional Detective Novel, Ryukishi has purposely flown in the face of the Dine rules and made 'Love' the central theme to this story. So I think this central 'Truth' that the message bottle writer wanted us to reach cannot be reached by the normal Detective Novel methods. It must be viewed from an understanding of why the people do the things they do on the island. Well, the thing is we can probably reach the other side if we've gotten one of them. I'm just guessing that Bernkastel can only solve the mysteries and cannot truly reach the 'Truth' in EP7 because she lacks love. 8) |
|
2010-07-15, 20:28 | Link #13950 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Okay, slightly different direction this time, but I think this is just as significant.
Just some thoughts on how the detective authority works: Spoiler for size:
__________________
|
2010-07-15, 21:01 | Link #13951 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
Although, as shown in episode 6, like all "magic", Erika can control people perfectly well without the detective's authority.
DIanor has two abilities, as far as I can tell: Invoking Knox's decalogue... she needs a proclamation for this, as otherwise there's no guarentee it's in the mystery genre at all. Now, THIS is what allows Erika to make a perfect search - the decalogue states that the detective is not allowed to miss any vital clues or "hidden passages" or the like. Defending any red text that has already been stated, and applying old red texts (such as "Erika's seals are perfect") to new situations. This includes both witch red text and elevated Erika red text. |
2010-07-16, 01:03 | Link #13952 | |
Dea ex Kakera
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sea of Fragments
|
Quote:
Now I'm remembering all the times a furniture character claimed to have become human... Maybe that was a signal that they'd abandoned their role for whatever reason.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-16, 01:15 | Link #13953 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brazil - São Paulo
Age: 31
|
Quote:
But still, I believe that some of the servants who claim to be furniture have characters in the Meta-world and fantasy scenes which represent them. Like how Ronove might represent Genji. |
|
2010-07-16, 08:31 | Link #13956 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Quote:
A couple of things ive noticed in 6 Spoiler for size:
__________________
|
|
2010-07-16, 08:40 | Link #13957 | |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Quote:
This is an interesting thought, but let me give my insight on this. Pairing this concept with the author theory and the things we have learned from EP6, I think I can reach a definitive on conclusion on what happened on EP5. The biggest wtf of that EP was Bern's ability to state reds, which brought us to believe that she was told them by Lambda. Now I don't think that's the case anymore. The reason Bern was able to make those red statements, was not because she knew the truth behind the gameboard. There is no absolute truth on a gameboard! As long as something isn't stated in red, the Game Master can change what happened there. Bern used the red not to state something that she was sure was in the gameboard, but to limit the Game Master options. Since the game is supposed to be a mystery novel, Bern took advantage of the Knox rules to eliminate by default certain options. She created her own character, a detective, in order to take full advantage from that. I think in particular the existence of "Knox 8" explains very well how Bern could use red even if there were reasonable doubts. Because Knox 8 destroys most of devil's proof logic: If there is no clue, it doesn't exist. To make an example. Let's say an inexperienced Game Master creates a closed room scenario. He moves the pieces on the gameboard and makes it so the culprit escaped from a secret passage. Then He writes over a story of how a witch killed the victim and then vaporized in thin air. The human side doesn't know which move the witch made, but it doesn't matter. The human side states in red that there is no secret passage in the room. And this not because the human side has any knowledge of the board, but simply because that's a rule of the mystery novels. At that point a logic error is created. The inexperienced Game Master must quickly change the setup of the Gameboard, he must find another human explanation for that murder that doesn't deny any other red. If he can't find any, he will be trapped forever in a logic error. So I think I've finally understood what kind of game the human side played on EP5. This would bring interesting developments should Wright enter in the picture. Wright would limit the Game Master options even further.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-16, 08:44 | Link #13958 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Kanon and Kyrie both exhibit a strange knowledge of closed rooms in ep6. Kyrie's has precedent going back to ep4, as well. Both of them are quite suspicious, as they don't normally exhibit this sort of information in the presence of others.
__________________
|
2010-07-16, 08:55 | Link #13959 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Warwick, RI
Age: 40
|
Also, this is my attempt at making a cosmology for Umineko. I wrote it out yesterday in my journal, before reading the Author Theory, which I've just read right now. It's pretty similar to it, but maybe breaks the realities down a little more than is needed, eheh. XD The big difference (?) is that personally, I do not think any of the 1998 stories we've seen have been "real" (as the Author Theory points out though, whether something is "real" doesn't necessarily mean there isn't truth to it). Ange's actions in Episode 4 were part of the Episode 4 message bottle story, obviously. When Ep 6 Ange sat down and read the story with Hachijo, she also read the scenes of Featherine and Miko!Ange. Personally, I think that outer story, of her and Ange and Amakusa and Hachijo, are also part of the message bottle, too, they just weren't in the version she was reading -- perhaps because her act of reading it is what put her in the story. XD Does that make any sense at all?
I also think when we reaching Rokkenjima-Prime in the final episode, it won't just be that we'll finally see reality, but that reality will be "revised" over the previous versions, just like the Game Master revising the scenario of the mysteries in Ep 6. Spoiler:
|
2010-07-16, 09:04 | Link #13960 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
It's quite easy to exist above the story yet also be part of it, actually. A bit odd, but hardly impossible. Stephen King appears as a character within The Dark Tower, for example, and Grant Morrison has conversations with characters in his own comic in his run of Animal Man.
The writer can write themselves into the story easily. This is what Hachijou/Featherine appears to be presenting to us... but I'm not actually convinced in her case. It's easy to exist on any fictional layer lower than one's own, since that essentially grants authorial power over lower layers. The question then becomes which layer the person exists on at the highest level. With a real-life author, that's somewhat easier... sometimes (Lemony Snicket being both a character in his books and a real-life "character" created and portrayed by the guy who actually wrote them).
__________________
|
|
|