2013-06-26, 09:44 | Link #29102 |
→ Wandering Bard
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Grancel City, Liberl Kingdom
|
US Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban
The Supreme Court has ruled that under the Equal Protection clause that the Federal Defense of Marriage Act "Demeans the people who are under lawful same-sex marriages" and is therefore Unconstitutional. The United States Supreme Court has also refused to rule on the California Proposition 8 case, holding that the people suing do not have standing and therefore let's the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals narrow California ruling stand. Therefore, same-sex marriages are now legal in the State of California. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions...2-144_8ok0.pdf
__________________
Last edited by Netto Azure; 2013-06-26 at 09:59. |
2013-06-26, 09:53 | Link #29103 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2013-06-26, 09:59 | Link #29104 |
Kurumada's lost child
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Oh man... this is indeed a crazy news day... The Texas abortion scandal, the voting rights act getting overturned and now the same court has struck down gay marriage!
The cherry on top will be the incoming immigration bill; if the tea party house republicans block it then this-will-for-sure-terminate-the-republican-party-once-and-for-all.
__________________
|
2013-06-26, 10:05 | Link #29105 |
→ Wandering Bard
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Grancel City, Liberl Kingdom
|
Whoops, I misquoted that, actually it's the broad district court ruling that covers the State of California that strikes down Proposition 8 that gives the California government the go ahead to resume same-sex marriages. The Supreme Court ruled that both it and the appeals court do not have jurisdiction to rule on it since the proponents of the law stopped being the State of California, to indirect private citizens who wished to continue the appeals process.
__________________
|
2013-06-26, 10:19 | Link #29106 |
AS Oji-kun
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 74
|
In Texas, the Republicans first claimed the bill had passed but reversed themselves around 3 am admitting that the required procedure for the bill to be signed by the chair did not happen before midnight. Of course, they blamed this on the protestors. Abortion-rights supporters pointed to the mysterious change in the datestamp of when the vote took place suggesting the Republicans knew they could not truly demonstrate that the vote occurred before midnight. (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/27/us...tion-bill.html)
Observers seem to think Perry will call the legislature back into another special session in an effort to ram SB 5 through. On the gay marriage decisions, I guessed the right outcomes (punt on Prop8; overturn DOMA) but not the margins; both cases were decided 5-4. Kennedy played his usual "median justice" role on DOMA and wrote the decision. On Prop8 both Scalia and Roberts joined Breyer, Kagan, and Ginsburg and refused to rule on the merits based on the plaintiffs' lack of "standing." Sotomayor joined the remaining three Republican appointees in the minority. While it's common to hear liberals claim Scalia and Thomas are "joined at the hip," this is just the latest case where they took opposite sides. I read a comment allegedly made by Scalia on the "hip-joining" arguments to the effect of "I'm an originalist, not a nutcase." Scalia and Ginsburg are reportedly good friends when they are not wearing their robes.
__________________
|
2013-06-26, 12:03 | Link #29107 |
On a mission
Author
|
Racism is over cuz Obama is president lololol. Too much Boondocks people?
So I see the GOP has taken the "Bury head in sand, and die approach", though their real tactic, like all bandwagoning scum is to jump ship and join the Democrats to continue their crap. Still, I am glad that such abominations such as prop 8 are eroding away, and perhaps this country can finally join our peers in the 21st century or something. It's been pretty embarassing.
__________________
|
2013-06-26, 12:14 | Link #29108 | |
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2013-06-26, 13:39 | Link #29110 | |
Crazy Devout Fanboy
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1st Ra Cailum-class battleship Ra Cailum, port-side officer's bunks
|
Quote:
Perfectly straight and relatively-young man speaking here. For the record.
__________________
|
|
2013-06-26, 14:43 | Link #29111 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
There's going to be an enormous amount of pocket resistance (state-level) and there may be problems as the critical-thinking-challenged resort to violence when it is clear their logic-numbed assertions aren't going to win the day. Just saying to keep a big stick handy for the insane clowns.
__________________
|
2013-06-26, 15:02 | Link #29113 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Age: 40
|
Quote:
Right now, I'm turning my eyes towards the 2020 Olympics bid on the upcoming September 7. Among the remaining 3 cities, Tokyo is the most deserving when we look at the overall picture. No disrespect, but something would be extremely wrong if the IOC awards the games to either Istanbul or Madrid will all the sackload of crap (on economics or social politics) going on in both countries. |
|
2013-06-26, 15:08 | Link #29114 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dai Korai Teikoku
|
Quote:
I'm rooting for Istanbul. |
|
2013-06-26, 15:27 | Link #29115 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Age: 40
|
Quote:
Istanbul just shot themselves in the foot with all the protests, violence and social bull going over there. Good luck expecting to award the games in a hot zone like that with their own domestic issues and the Syrian war at the gates. Furthermore, they have to build everything from scratch and that means it will cost more. Madrid... that would be the equivalent of Athens in terms how it would cripple an economy that is already weak. The only difference is that Spain is already in the red while Greece was barely holding their heads out of the water. |
|
2013-06-26, 16:54 | Link #29116 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dai Korai Teikoku
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2013-06-26, 17:59 | Link #29117 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Age: 40
|
Quote:
Furthermore, the last Olympics in England proved that the competition sites don't have to be only restricted to Tokyo; London also mobilized Manchester, Newcastle, Cardiff, Coventry and Glasgow for some venues. So mobilizing other venues would not be a problem. Quote:
|
||
2013-06-26, 18:31 | Link #29120 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Age: 40
|
Quote:
Meanwhile, I would prefer a place like Auckland to host Olympics soon. New Zealanders are doing very well in their corner and the last Rugby World Cup left a very good taste in my mouth. Last edited by KiraYamatoFan; 2013-06-27 at 02:12. |
|
Tags |
current affairs, discussion, international |
|
|