|
View Poll Results: To Aru Majutsu no Index - Episode 16 Rating | |||
Perfect 10 | 10 | 20.83% | |
9 out of 10 : Excellent | 14 | 29.17% | |
8 out of 10 : Very Good | 13 | 27.08% | |
7 out of 10 : Good | 7 | 14.58% | |
6 out of 10 : Average | 4 | 8.33% | |
5 out of 10 : Below Average | 0 | 0% | |
4 out of 10 : Poor | 0 | 0% | |
3 out of 10 : Bad | 0 | 0% | |
2 out of 10 : Very Bad | 0 | 0% | |
1 out of 10 : Painful | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
2009-01-21, 07:03 | Link #1 | ||||
♪~ Daydreaming ~♪
Graphic Designer
Administrator Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Italy
|
To Aru Majutsu no Index - Episode 16 Discussion / Poll
Welcome to the discussion thread for To Aru Majutsu no Index, Episode 16.
Thread Guidelines
|
||||
2009-01-22, 00:10 | Link #3 |
そのおっぱいで13才
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
(・∀・) !!!!!!!!!
(´・ω・`) Novel rape... (;゚Д゚) They seemed to have wiped out an entire 1/4 or so of the volume by removing the complete existence of a villain... (´;ω;`) How dare you, JC Staff... (#゚Д゚) NAZEEEEE DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
__________________
|
2009-01-22, 01:06 | Link #4 |
そのおっぱいで13才
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Hino:
"ANGEL-SAMA!! LOOK, ANGEL-SAMA!! MY APPEARANCE GOT REMOVED!! ANGEL-SAMAAAAAAAAAAA!!! ---- 6/10 Ee...~, changing Imouto into a lazy hostess and removing the scene with her breasts is one thing, since the story doesn't really change, but why did they completely remove Hino? It's like with Dummy in the Alchemist arc... They took out a whole character and plot... Except Kino is more important... And thanks to that, any action before the climax turns into a boring bunch of conversations on who casted Angel Falls, and then Touma's mom go home and Misha gets suspected which gave Touma a different reason to go home... ... And that other girl got an appearance, which conveniently allows Touma to get back. What was her name... Overall, it was a somewhat weak episode... It's nice they explained Motoharu's position, and the whole mystery of Angel Fall's caster was somewhat interesting, but can't really say the episode did anything but that... Slow... Just overall uninteresting. -They removed Kanzaki's story...? Or do they plan to add it next episode? I personally wouldn't mind it removed though... -Though no matter how annoying her personality is, no doubt her body (oiiii~, JC Staff, her breasts are a bit too big!) is sexy... Except you can't see much in the anime, huh... -OP didn't change... -Misha's very amusing hand position... got... removed... you, say...! -Touya turned irritating in the anime... (-_-; ) Preview: SUPER spoiler preview, thanks a lot.
__________________
Last edited by serenade_beta; 2009-01-22 at 11:32. |
2009-01-23, 04:37 | Link #13 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
2009-01-23, 05:02 | Link #14 |
Ex-Otaku
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: It's classified.
|
I've already expected that would happen after I watched the Deep Blood Arc. Somehow I can understand why, J.C. Staff might try to squeeze as much as possible into 1 season and probably leave a cliffhanger and make fans anticipate a 2nd season or OVA or both even.
__________________
|
2009-01-24, 04:32 | Link #15 | |
Takao Tsundere Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Classified
|
Quote:
I read someone from myanimelist was okay they got rid of that one guy they remove from the anime.
__________________
|
|
2009-01-24, 04:47 | Link #16 | |
そのおっぱいで13才
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
Then again, in that logic, they might have well as removed the alchemist and... Hime... what's her name...... And take out Otohime and etc. for not having any relationship in the future plot too. Yet one of the more exciting(?) material of the volume in the novel has to be removed? As expected of the sense of the company that used a SE that resembled a level-up music.
__________________
|
|
|
|