|
View Poll Results: Nanoha StrikerS - Overall series rating | |||
Perfect 10 | 47 | 15.99% | |
9 out of 10 : Excellent | 52 | 17.69% | |
8 out of 10 : Very Good | 57 | 19.39% | |
7 out of 10 : Good | 62 | 21.09% | |
6 out of 10 : Average | 44 | 14.97% | |
5 out of 10 : Below Average | 8 | 2.72% | |
4 out of 10 : Poor | 11 | 3.74% | |
3 out of 10 : Bad | 3 | 1.02% | |
2 out of 10 : Very Bad | 1 | 0.34% | |
1 out of 10 : Painful | 9 | 3.06% | |
Voters: 294. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
2008-10-12, 15:04 | Link #161 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
How speculating about the end of the movie could be considered as "fact stating"? We have serious problems here Cuídate y sigue sonriendo |
|
2008-10-12, 15:09 | Link #162 | ||
Master of the Shiny Crack
Author
|
Quote:
Quote:
The fact stated: We do not in any way know what will happen relationship wise in the new movie. I was not speculating in the least. Speculating would imply I believed it will happen. |
||
2008-10-12, 15:12 | Link #163 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Cuídate y sigue sonriendo |
|
2008-10-12, 15:20 | Link #167 | |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
However, if we remove any NanoFate innuendo (by, let's say, placing Fate in a separate room) then yes, all that happened between Nanoha and Vivio would have concluded as it did in StrikerS. Why? Because as I said before: Fate added nothing to the Nanoha/Vivio plot, and only served to take up screentime that should have been used to display issues that were addressed during the final battle. |
|
2008-10-12, 15:33 | Link #168 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Cuídense y sigan sonriendo |
|
2008-10-12, 15:56 | Link #169 |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Your theory depends on bucketloads of more hypothetical scenarios, theories, and tiny lines stretched to impossible sizes (if I were to do that too, NanoVita would be damn near canon) then mine. However, such situations have nothing to do with the actual editorial scenario, as you're invoking real life psychiatry here (which leaves me to wonder why you're leaving the flaws I've pointed out untouched).
From an editorial standpoint, you can take out all the NanoFate happy family scenes, and still have Nanoha take the choices she made in the anime. If we replace said scenes with actual development in Nanoha's road through parentage, we only strengthen said choices. What did Fate, actively, contribute to the Nanoha/Vivio scenario? The answer is nothing that couldn't have been done better and more in line with the Nanoha/Vivio plot. As you said, she was an example for Nanoha as a mother, even though we only got to see this in one scene. But does she need to be in the same room and in the same bed to do so? The answer is no. By focusing on the other aspect StrikerS disregarded in the anime, Fate's parentage of Erio and Caro, you would receive two things: One, you'd have the aforementioned 'example as a mother' and two, you'd receive character development for the Fate/Erio/Caro scenario. Your scenario, or rather StrikerS scenario, only tries to develop one scenario, and as I explained before did so in a flawed way. Nanoha does not get a chance to display the insecurities the final battle tells us she experienced. My scenario develops two scenarios at the same time, allowing for scenes of Nanoha to feel insecure as a mother and turn to Fate for support, while at the same time we develop the Fate/Erio/Caro scenario, thus leaving us more involved with their story and strengthen the anime overall. Also, as your scenario filled with happy family goes at the cost of the insecure Nanoha, it weakens the Nanoha/Vivio plot. Your scenario leaves one plot abandoned and weakens the other, while My scenario only strengthens two plots. You don't even need to get rid of NanoFate at all, you can still have NanoFate by having Fate act as a councilor. Imagine the lovely drama scenes of Nanoha feeling like breaking down and Fate offering council. Do give me one solid reason why the NanoFateVivio happy family scenario is the right one? |
2008-10-12, 16:06 | Link #170 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Also you may as well rewrite the whole season and include both of them, there is no problem with that, but the way the series is now worked fine for me, I didn't want to have characters that no one likes wasting more screentime when the series is lacking of something as basic as action. Cuídense y sigan sonriendo |
|
2008-10-12, 16:28 | Link #171 | |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Like I said before plenty of times, I am aware of the wasted screentime. I'm an editor. It's my job to look at videos and make sure I don't waste screentime. However, its also my job to pick out those scenes that waste screentime and insert scenes that don't. In the case of Erio and Caro, many of the scenes with Erio and Caro, particularly in the later episodes, become wasted because they had a lack of screentime in the earlier part. The audience doesn't feel connected to them, so their battles are boring in comparison to the battles of characters they do feel connected to. By inserting the Fate/Erio/Caro scenes, we make those scenes more tensional, as the audience is now more involved with those characters. This means that the screentime of Erio and Caro is no longer 'wasted' but 'properly used' Back to the original topic, while the attempt at dodging my question is dully noted, you still have not answered my question. Why is the flawed development of one scenario better then the proper development of two? |
|
2008-10-12, 17:09 | Link #172 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Erio Mondial: 3,52% Caro Ru Lushe: 6,39% Nanoha Takamachi: 41,18% Fate Testarossa: 48,89% (Not exclusive, those who like Erio may like Caro as well) Taking the poll from this board would be a bad idea since this is a very closed community and we are not Japan, so I took a representative sample of works (5767) made by Japanese fans, and extrapolate that to the whole fanbase. This is just an estimation, but the numbers of the real polls should be something similar to this. Quote:
I said that the series was long enough to develop all the forwards if they wanted as well, but they wasted whole episodes with filler, training, and useless characters. They gave priority to Nanoha and Fate, and that's logic too because they are the most popular characters, but that doesn't means that they couldn't eliminate a random filler episode and gave the forwards some character development, and don't have nothing against that. Cuídense y sigan sonriendo |
||
2008-10-12, 17:18 | Link #173 | |
Master of the Shiny Crack
Author
|
Quote:
|
|
2008-10-12, 17:23 | Link #174 | |||
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And as the final battle showed, Fate/Erio/Caro was supposed to be her plot line. But it got dumped in favor of... guess what? NanoFate. |
|||
2008-10-12, 17:25 | Link #175 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Cuídense y sigan sonriendo |
|
2008-10-12, 17:32 | Link #176 | |
Master of the Shiny Crack
Author
|
Quote:
|
|
2008-10-12, 17:41 | Link #177 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't say that Erio and Caro were hated by all of the people who prefer Nanoha and Fate rather than them, but is clear that they prefer the other characters, so this way the Studio knows what the fans want to see and how to use their screen time. Quote:
Quote:
Cuídense y sigan sonriendo |
||||
2008-10-12, 17:53 | Link #178 | ||
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Quote:
I don't mind fanservice, but fanservice that disrupts the plot is something I loathe. Once again you're fabulously missing the point I've been trying to make clear. NanoFate was the reason the Fate/Erio/Caro plotline got scrapped. Now obviously, to get this plotline back without contradicting, you'd have to cut down on the NanoFate and focus on the Fate/Erio/Caro. I'll admit that doing both is possible with a bit of tweaking in the allocation of screentime, but that still wouldn't solve the issue of the Nanoha/Vivio plot being run into the ground, not to mention it still doesn't solve the other problems such as Hayate's screentime and proper introduction of the numbers and explanations of Jail's goal. Last edited by Keroko; 2008-10-12 at 18:19. |
||
2008-10-12, 17:53 | Link #179 | ||
He Who Smites Shippers
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Quote:
Let me pose a question to you regarding the character dynamics here, Haru. There is a fic on my old boards called 'A Bridge Over Troubled Waters' which features the NanoFate pairing as Fate pining for Nanoha, who is clueless about Fate's feelings for her, while Hayate stands off to one side and plays matchmaker on Fate's behalf, usually with highly amusing consequences. The author has hinted that Fate is eventually going to get around to confessing her feelings to Nanoha, but for the time being the focus is more on the story and less on the relationship. Now am I understanding correctly that you would pass on such a fic simply because it doesn't have the "Happy Family" relationship?
__________________
|
||
2008-10-12, 18:23 | Link #180 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Nanoha and Fate are in the series from the first season, so you need to start counting there, since the people liked them from that point. Otherwise it would be like saying "It's not fair! Wii sells more than PS3 because its cheaper!" or "XBox 360 only sells more than PS3 because it came out a year before!". Excuses, those are competitive advantages and that's how our market works. Quote:
Quote:
The fic you mentioned sounds good, but I don't recall it at ff.net. Is posted in another site? Cuídense y sigan sonriendo |
|||
|
|