2010-09-02, 11:43 | Link #17041 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
I think he wasted money in many different failing projects.
I can hardly see how it could be all just a lie. If he didn't have any trouble in the world of finance, then why would he need to commit a crime?
__________________
|
2010-09-02, 11:48 | Link #17042 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Seriously though, the correct theory is that Krauss is just overconfident and thinks he won't repeat his financial mistakes again, even though we know he will. But I will always go with the alternative that makes George look terrible and Krauss look awesome. Krauss destroyed George's head in episode 4. With a punch. |
|
2010-09-02, 11:57 | Link #17046 | |
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Quote:
I'd love to seriously study the 419 scammers, and figure out how the heck do they manage to fool anyone at all -- the list of "anyone" includes people who are otherwise quite normal and sometimes fairly smart, and most importantly, experiments show, that 419 scammers are, as a rule, not smarter than their victims -- often quite the contrary. Unfortunately, it's problematic to calculate how many of those potential victims are out there in general population and see if there is anything in common among them, without sending out my own scam as an unsolicited bulk email, which would be way too unethical even for me. That Krauss got caught once -- that is, if he really did -- is not a good example of his general intelligence, but rather, may turn out to mean that he is generally trusting. (One of my best friends says "I'm not stupid, just a bit naive." She is. And she has two degrees in number theory.) As it has been said by the characters in the same Ep5, Krauss' business is about being trusted with other people's money, and it may well be that he is actually generally successful in it because he is trusting -- in many situations, it's simply easier to trust someone who readily trusts you. That is, until someone figures out you can get taken advantage of repeatedly, and starts milking you... And that may turn out to have been another character in the story.
__________________
|
|
2010-09-02, 12:10 | Link #17047 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2010-09-02, 12:38 | Link #17048 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
If we take for true what has been shown in EP5 and what Kinzo said about him before (Okay Kinzo is dead but that could still be his real opinion), I don't think you could just say that he just failed once or that he's simply too trusting.
Krauss has been described as someone who has good ideas but always messes up the timing. In the world of finance knowing when to buy and when to sell is the most important skill you need to have, even more than what to buy and what to sell. If you lack this skill you simply aren't fit for this world. Kinzo describes Krauss as someone that "invests 2 and gain 1" hinting that this kind of failing pattern repeated itself many times. Krauss in EP5 wasn't simply shown as careless or trusting. Natsuhi quite apparently told him not to trust suspicious people and he refused to listen to her. There's a bit of pride here, despite being completely dumb Krauss wants to believe he's smarter. If even Natsuhi, not really the smartest kid on the block, could understand that someone was a scammer, then it wasn't even a "good" scammer and Krauss is even more gullible than your average con artist victim. Additionally using your own house as a collateral, embezzling money from your father, denotes a total lack of responsibility. This is the kind of behavior you would expect from a gambler addict. And that's probably what Krauss is, except he's been gambling several millions of yen each time. To get to this point Krauss must have lost money in several occasions. He certainly must have gained some, but as Kinzo said, he probably gained 1 while losing 2.
__________________
|
2010-09-02, 12:51 | Link #17049 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
He's certainly played up as exceptionally dumb in ep5. Which, in some ways, contradicts his earlier character. He plays the siblings for fools in ep1 with no particularly meaningful information, has been managing the Kinzo charade as the face-man to the siblings (with Natsuhi handling the logistics), tends not to crack under pressure, and seems pretty competent at circling the wagons whenever he survives the FT. We also almost never see the actual family conference negotiations, but they take a very long time in every episode where they're not interrupted, so apparently Krauss has some kind of ability to hold his own against the other siblings.
It's also mentioned quite a bit that Krauss is good at playing his siblings off each other, something Eva seems annoyed by and tries to avoid it so that she, Rudolf, and Rosa can put up a unified front against him. Then there's his "kidnapping" in two episodes. Especially ep5. He disappears with a strange phone call, his bed is coated in fake blood, and he's nowhere to be found again. If not for the red stating he was killed, how would we even know what he's doing? Natsuhi refuses to incriminate him, but that's just because she's pure and faithful. It doesn't mean he is. I can't really swallow him as a particularly logical mastermind or culprit, but I think he's been rendered a bit too much of a fan joke than he actually is. He's gotta have something between his shoulders to take on all three of his siblings at once and win.
__________________
|
2010-09-02, 13:02 | Link #17050 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
It's a common mistake to think that a person is either intelligent in everything or stupid in everything.
There are many "intelligences", one could be a genius in math and still be completely incompetent at work. The fact that Krauss doesn't have a knack in the world of finance doesn't necessarily contradicts his apparent ability to hold his ground with his sibling. To begin with he was never described as someone who totally lack a brain even though that space tourism thing really seems to suggest otherwise. But maybe that was just the result of a sort of gamble addiction that clouded his mind.
__________________
|
2010-09-02, 13:05 | Link #17051 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
According to ep5, it's not so much scams... more that he invests in something too early, panics when it doesn't do well, and sells it off. It then takes off without him. Can't remember the exact scene which gave this impression, though.
Incidentally... how would any Krauss culprit theory get around the red saying he is not the culprit? Or the fact that he's confirmed dead in the first episode FT... and the second episode FT... and shortly after the 5th episode FT? |
2010-09-02, 13:21 | Link #17052 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
That's the same old question. Culprit of what? Being not the culprit of a particular murder doesn't mean not being the mastermind or the culprit behind the explosion.
Plus If I were to exclude everyone that was said to be not the culprit at least once, including Van dine rules and excluding those who can't possibly be the culprit then who remains? George Jessica Rosa Eva Kyrie Yasu
__________________
|
2010-09-02, 14:45 | Link #17053 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
After all, if anyone seriously tried to investigate him or blame him for the murders, he'd kill them and their entire family with a single punch. Yes. Krauss is the culprit due to Pure Awesome. It works. |
||
2010-09-02, 15:37 | Link #17054 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
EDIT: Also the one punch thing makes Krauss look like Batman. Spoiler for ONE PUNCH:
|
|
2010-09-02, 15:47 | Link #17056 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Age: 31
|
Quote:
And KDetective would by AWESOME take that aimed at Bern. |
|
2010-09-02, 15:50 | Link #17058 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
I'll say this now a lot of my "hints" for George involve him detecting things like the letters and interest in the letters and stuff.
If George turned out to be the detective in episode 8 based on his deductions in the first few games. I would give up reasoning completely. Because then each suspicious hint about him can be twisted into something putting him in a positive light.
__________________
|
2010-09-02, 15:51 | Link #17059 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Age: 31
|
Yeah, Dlanor said it. I was just making some wishes about EP8 .
Quote:
|
|
|
|