2008-12-03, 08:37 | Link #1561 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Cough cough.
You are forgetting the "generator" that the numbers blew up in the HQ. Nah, there definitely is some kind og magical power sources (ala nuclear plants) that power things like electricty and so on. Why they don't use those for mage weapons? That's...something that bothered me for a while, but my answer is that it's *hard* to control without linker core. And politics. And plotohole. |
2008-12-03, 09:08 | Link #1562 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
My preferred in-universe explaination is politics. The existence of things like the training autospheres imply that control doesn't appear to be an issue. Therefore, the reason the TSAB does not use this technology to arm non-mages is because they don't want the kind of weapons proliferation you'd get due to it, it'd be like non-magic weapons all over again.
Meta-story, the focus of the franchise is on mages using their internal power to cast spectacular attacks on their enemies. If that kind of power were available to every average joe-on-street, there'd be nothing unique about the girls, now would there? Personally, I think 7arcs bungled when they specifically referred to Arc-en-ciel as a magic-cannon in A's. If they hadn't done that, they could have had deniability and let people think the cannon was non-magical. But even that would have only lasted until Strikers when they mentioned specifically that non-magic weapons were banned. That pins down the fact that the AeC can't be a non-magic cannon. |
2008-12-03, 10:58 | Link #1563 | ||
黒猫のウィズやってます
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Quote:
(IIRC StrikerS Chronicle was posted before by somebody in the image thread.Please refer it) Quote:
|
||
2008-12-03, 14:00 | Link #1564 |
Truth Martyr
Author
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Doing Anzu's paperwork.
Age: 38
|
I recall somewhere where someone translated that for the vehicles, they're essentially running on water; some sorta catalyst mechanism. Either that or hydrogen fuel cells.
__________________
|
2008-12-03, 18:04 | Link #1565 |
Blazing General
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CA
Age: 37
|
It probably doesn't mean much since the series has changed quite a bit since then but the core of the Garden of Time's power-generation apparatus was a little crystal thing, too. Just like every other artifact of consequence in Nanoha.
I find it kind of interesting that the Intelligent Device cores follow the general 'crystal = power source' motif but the Armed Devices don't appear to have any similar parts.
__________________
|
2008-12-05, 01:26 | Link #1566 |
Sword Wielding Penguin
|
I would say it's not so much a power source, as much as the 'computer core'... so to speak. Sure, it's got a power core in there... but as an 'Intelligent' Device, what would it have that needs to be larger and more powerful than a less intelligent armed device?
The 'brain'. |
2008-12-05, 03:29 | Link #1567 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Personally, I'll say that the current evidence shows a technical gap. Power probably isn't the issue - even if mobile power generation isn't fully up to the mark yet, they can just use cartridges to feed the guns. The problem most probably is modulation. We know that with lots of volume available (say a ship), Midchildran magitech can at least perform simple modulations of vast amounts of generated / assembled mana (such as distort space or attack with high energy beams). At lower power levels, with large facilities, it is possible to perform some very elegant modulations - such as the ability to generate a holographic city with good fidelity on a specially created "plate". However, the choice of regular (though supposedly with a more advanced fuel) instead of magical propulsion for cars and (apparently) helicopters, the crummy performance of the magi-tanks, the obviously limited capability of the autospheres (and the Gadget drones aren't anything to cheer about either) and the Regius and High Council's emphasis on ethically controversial Artificial Mages and human-based Combat Cyborgs strongly suggest that there is a gap with the ability of magitech to modulate magic (or similar energies) in the land/air mobile size range. Either the modulator is much more volumous or it is able to handle very low amounts of energy (say enough to make a nice poke-poke monitor). Presumably, by using humans as base, Scarlietti was able to leverage off the existing human Linker Core related control circuitry to control his IS attacks, which look ridiculously like magic anyway... The problem of fully artificial control at small sizes is almost certainly solvable when one looks at say the Jewel Seeds. We call them running out of control, and they clearly aren't performing to norm, but what we actually see them do actually suggests more of a very sophisticated modulation system is working than not. Quote:
Last edited by arkhangelsk; 2008-12-05 at 04:38. Reason: To Jimmy |
||||
2008-12-05, 05:37 | Link #1568 |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
We also have Runessa in the SSX, who wields a gun firing physical bullets under a special license. While we don't know how the bullets are fired, this may mean that the ban on mass weaponry is not as extreme as we initially thought. It may simply mean that mass based weaponry is simply treated like higher-grade military weapons. The normal crowd isn't supposed to get them, but the army is still allowed the use them.
|
2008-12-05, 13:17 | Link #1569 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
Right now that dialog in SSX does confirm one thing for sure, manufactured physical rounds are not banned by the Bureau, even if their use is highly regulated. For the moment, I'm willing to say they allow the use of such ammuniton as long as the weapon can only be used by a mage. So the device probably uses magic to fire the bullets. @arkhangelsk. I wanted to reply to your response, but I can't pull it together right now. I'll type something in the morning if I can. In the meantime, it would be helpful to me if you could elaborate further on what you mean by modulate magic. |
|
2008-12-05, 16:36 | Link #1570 |
Field Medic
|
another issue is that the demonstrated and proven methods of magical control on the small scale also raises ethical and moral quandaries that may not be easily resolved.
That is, we Know Artifical Linker cores are possible (reference Wolkenritter and Reinforce Zwei, also Agito) but in those cases, the resulting 'artefact' happens to be a fully sentient being with rights and the means to enforce them. similarly, it's possible to enhance a non-sentient Linker core to a more useful format (eg, Familiars) but again, the subject also gains full sentience and associated rights involved. I'm not sure where Intelligent Devices fall; our Characters certainly don't treat them as being merely equipment, though how the law addresses that may be open to interpretation. now, part of Jails plan may have been to attempt to pursue this kind of enhancement of lesser Linker cores into a more useful level without raising these issues ( at least, that may be what the Bureau asked for; they can't really be seen to be turning sentients into puppet weapons) but it seems as though he wasn't successful, since the lower classes (the Gadget Drones) aren't terribly impressive, while the higher Classes ( Numbers and Relic Weapons) still end up full sentient, albeit with a built in remote control function that can override that. So, it may be political again; the Bureau knows (roughly, at least) how to create a highly developed, self powered magical control system, but can't deal with the side-effects without making themselves look very bad... |
2008-12-05, 23:54 | Link #1571 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
Also, in the creation of familiars, LCs aren't "enhanced". It appears that the mage calls forth a soul to inhabit the animal and powers it with her own magic. Quote:
For all we know, people do think of that. And the ones who make such weapons are considered criminals by the Bureau. Quote:
Think of possible missions for a magi-tank, then think of the magical power requirements for it, then we'll talk some more about this. If you can't think of one, maybe they weren't intended to fight in the first place? And I still would like to know what you mean by "modulate". |
|||
2008-12-06, 13:24 | Link #1572 |
Truth Martyr
Author
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Doing Anzu's paperwork.
Age: 38
|
*shrug* Real world. Tasers and stun guns aren't really considered weapons and are street legal, in contrast to other firearms which need lisences and the like (varies between each country, of course).
As for the tanks: on one hand, they could be tanks that didn't work that well. On the other hand, they could be static displays. *shrugs* Almost all military bases have static displays of some sort; typically decomissioned hardware. EDIT: Regards Runessa, like TK has said, the TSAB probably doesn't care too much how you kill people so long as you use magic to power it. That's how Graf Eisen gets its pass, despite Swallow Flier being an attack using metal balls: it's a 2-stage attack consisting of magic-coated metal balls that are fired away with the force of Vita's magic. Without her magic there's no attack.
__________________
|
2008-12-06, 14:01 | Link #1573 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Actually, the "possible missions" for a magi-tank depend vitally on the performance of the overall magical complex. Obviously, they are very different if they can generate only A-equivalent than if they can generate S-equivalent. For now, their performance suggests that they are better than wimp mages, which gives them a certain utility but they don't hold a candle to >A range human or cyborg opponents. Working down from this volumetrically, and looking at other data points, we can have a reasonable idea of the likely tactical characteristics of say a magi-rifle, which is to say not a lot - maybe D-equiv. Which is probably why we see magiships and some magitanks, but no magirifles. Quote:
As of cartridges, it is obvious that small power generation clearly is possible. Which IMO leaves control issues as the major technical problem. |
|||
2008-12-06, 15:12 | Link #1574 |
Blazing General
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CA
Age: 37
|
Well, there is always the possibility that cartridges serve more as a catalyst for drawing out more of the mage's own power- at any rate it helps explain why they were considered a contributing factor in Nanoha's health issues. Though I suppose there could just be opportunity for feedback in the control process.
__________________
|
2008-12-06, 16:15 | Link #1575 |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
You have to remind me where we saw this 'performance' then. Because as far as I can remember all we really could really see was a burning wreckage, which while not flattering, shows little of its performance during combat, be it good or bad.
|
2008-12-06, 17:00 | Link #1576 | |
Sword Wielding Penguin
|
Quote:
If they were nothing more than trucks, you might have some flipped over to get at mages in them... but empty trucks would remain untouched. But the fact is... they HAD tanks... which are not cheap to build, even crappy ones. The tanks were deployed for combat and were taken out, which means they weren't mere decorations. If the tanks were NOT at least marginally more powerful than the standard redshirt mage, there would be no reason to waste the money building them, and the money needed to train mages to use them when the mages could be doing the same thing themselves. And they wouldn't use tanks to get around... They'd have jeeps, or trucks for that. And don't give me that nonsense political issues excuse either. Even politicians aren't THAT stupid... and most certainly would not go spending a bunch of money on useless and unflashy things when they could be spent on equally useless, but flashier things... like Regius' pet supercannon project. Einjarihar. In universe, those tanks were obviously of some marginal capability over a redshirt mage to be cost effective enough to even be built in the first place. We'll never see what they can do, but we have an idea as to where they sit in the heigherarchy based on their existence, their location, and who/what it takes to stomp them. |
|
2008-12-06, 17:11 | Link #1577 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On another matter, tanks of any kind would have been useless against flying combat cyborgs with attacks that can cut through armor. They'd never be able to train their guns fast enough or high enough to get a bead on them, that's not what they were designed to do. Calling them "crappy" because of that is like calling the M1 Abrams MBT crappy because it cannot engage an antitank helicopter gunship in the air. Quote:
No, A's explicitly shows that cartridges are really extra bursts of magical energy. |
||||
2008-12-06, 21:53 | Link #1578 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
By the way, it is perfectly possible, even with mere Terran technology, to make a large-caliber, antiair gun tank, such as the Otomatic with a 120RPM capability. Quote:
|
|||||
2008-12-07, 00:17 | Link #1579 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And like I said, magi-rifles aren't being discussed here. Give me possible roles for magi-tanks and likely powerlevels first! Last edited by Jimmy C; 2008-12-07 at 01:02. |
|||||
2008-12-07, 01:24 | Link #1580 |
Truth Martyr
Author
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Doing Anzu's paperwork.
Age: 38
|
A note to Ark: military installations do have static displays made from decomissioned hardware. Take the various cold-war SAC bases (before BRAC, anyway) and the many, many decomissioned tanks at various Cav and Armor bases.
Ark, I understand that you're from Hong Kong, which is a rather pacifistic place and such, with not much of a military presence, but surely you've heard of static displays at military bases? Many airbases and military bases that can get museum pieces have them - for instance at Butterworth AB here in Malaysia we've got a number of museum pieces as outdoor displays: old Hunters and an old Mirage, and a number of A-4s that are permanantly retired as outdoor displays. So no, museum pieces at static displays at a military base are not inconceivable.
__________________
|
|
|