2006-10-22, 16:23 | Link #23 | |||
#BlastoMayo Tyrant
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Kupop; 2006-10-22 at 16:28. Reason: Added another quote |
|||
2006-10-22, 18:19 | Link #25 |
#BlastoMayo Tyrant
|
Correct. PCI-E and PCI are incompatible. And, even if they were compatible, there's no way the PCI slot could handle the throughput required for the graphics card to perform anywhere near its intended speed. That's the entire reason the AGP slot was designed in the the first place: to provide a faster connection for the increasingly high demands of graphics cards (PCI-E x16 is even faster than AGP 8x, of course). Either you're going to have to find an AGP card or you're going to have to upgrade your motherboard as well (in order to work with PCI-E cards). Since you are working off of a tight budget of $70, I suggest hunting down an AGP card. Since you seem intent on getting a GeForce rather than a Radeon, I suggest you start searching on eBay (or, as mentioned, craigslist) for a 6600 GT AGP. If you look for them anywhere else, they'll be outside of your price range. However, since you'll be going to eBay (or craigslist) anyway to get the 6600 GT, I'd like to re-recommend getting a Radeon X800 Pro as it outperforms the 6600 GT (at lower resolutions, they perform similarly... however, when all of the following are enabled, the X800 has anywhere from a 60% to 100% better framerate than the 6600 GT) when displaying at higher resolutions, using anti-aliasing (smoothing the jaggies), and using anisotropic filtering (making things that are far away and at steep angles look prettier)... and it's only slightly (~$10-$15ish) higher than your price target.
Last edited by Kupop; 2006-10-22 at 18:48. Reason: grammatical error |
2006-10-22, 22:32 | Link #27 |
#BlastoMayo Tyrant
|
Linux isn't really a problem as he quite clearly said he needed the card for gaming (World of Warcraft and Final Fantasy XI specifically) and that he is using Windows XP. As for the Windows drivers, that's not so much a problem as the ATi drivers typically only have problems for the initial release and the first update after that for any card. The driver versions after that tend to be quite reliable (and that period has already passed for all of the cards mentioned in this thread so far).
|
2006-10-22, 22:53 | Link #28 | |
eh?
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: eh...
|
Quote:
btw, why did you decide to pick apart my response? seems odd to me... ATI fanboy?
__________________
|
|
2006-10-22, 23:39 | Link #31 |
Junior Member
|
not sure about anyone else having trouble with ati drivers, i've never had any since the 9700 pro was spanking nvidia. as of late, i've heard more problems from nvidia drivers than ati, being that its hard to pick out the right ones for performance. that being said, the 9800 pro/xt would be a pretty good value, if you cant afford a x800xl agp or a 6800gt(overpriced) agp. but it is true that i've heard the drivers for ati in linux, are total poo.
yeah, this is my first post as well. good evening all. |
2006-10-22, 23:59 | Link #32 |
#BlastoMayo Tyrant
|
I didn't even notice the "ATI fanboy" part of someguyouknow's post 'til now...
... so I figured I'd respond to it.
As a PC builder and an ex-computer-gamer (as of the end of last year), I've had to weigh the pros and cons of ATi vs. nVidia many times. In Hayamaneko's case, he's planning on playing two DirectX-based games (yes, WoW has an OpenGL mode... but it was a very broken one the last time I checked) with an AGP card. It should come as no surprise that an ATi card would be the best choice for him based on a performance:cost ratio. The nVidia cards from that era (and price range) could hold their own in DirectX-based games against ATi cards up until the point AA and AF were turned on. The 6800 Ultra (rather than the 6800 GT, which should have been the nVidia equivalent) was the closest in framerate to the X800 Pro under those circumstances. Now, if he were going to play, say, an OpenGL-based game, I'd suggest an nVidia card to him in a heartbeat. However, as it stands, ATi would be the better choice for him. Edit: Welcome, Truenofan. Last edited by Kupop; 2006-10-23 at 00:19. |
2006-10-24, 18:15 | Link #34 |
#BlastoMayo Tyrant
|
... I don't see where you're getting that. I pointed out that nVidia is better than ATi with OpenGL and that ATi is better than nVidia with DirectX in the cards that have been mentioned. They both have their strong points... one's just more suited to the op's question than the other.
|
2006-12-04, 23:02 | Link #37 |
cat boy?
|
OK, I am seriously considering getting one of the fallowing
http://cgi.ebay.com/ATI-Radeon-9800X...QQcmdZViewItem or http://cgi.ebay.com/Rosewill-Nvidia-...ayphotohosting They both come out to the same price, but since the 9800XT card seems to be some kinda of upgraded card with a wonky fan, I'm a little weary as to whether I should get it or not. Which one looks better?
__________________
|
2006-12-07, 06:39 | Link #39 |
Certified Organic
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
ive been looking for a new card and also found out i will need a new computer that has a PCI E mother board.
if you really want an agp card you can get a radeon x800 i think in AGP. i thought about it and decided i should just get a new computer with all this dual processor stuff coming out cheap now. honestly 5000+? mine is still at 2000 i currently have a 9800, and it will run your game fine, but i find that it is lacking alot compared to newer cards. |
|
|