2010-04-14, 14:48 | Link #7282 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-04-14, 14:52 | Link #7283 | |
Shameless Fangirl
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 33
|
Quote:
Even if Lelouch had been suicidal, that doesn't mean he'd come up with a better plan to bring about world peace if that hadn't been the case. Just another one. In fact, Lelouch said that there might be other ways, which could even mean that it would have been a lot more difficult.
__________________
|
|
2010-04-14, 16:56 | Link #7284 | |
Puppet Master
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Behind You
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-04-14, 18:14 | Link #7285 | ||
U Mad?
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brooklyn NY
|
Quote:
Unfortunately you must see where that would not make it any easier to swallow with people who find the entire thing perplexing and a major let down. One point is its highly debatable whether or not the entire sequence of ZR even meshes completely for Lelouch and Suzaku given how they acted throughout the series. Hey at one point in the series Lelouch was welcome to a very peaceful plan coming from the most pacified person in the series Princess Euphie. OK realistically we can see that the creators meant for Lelouch to die. They needed Leloulch to die, that's perfectly fair. Unfortunately that doesn't stop ZR from feeling like something that was planned out by Ougi. Lelouch is probably the greatest strategic mind on the earth and nothing about ZR (except Lelouch's death scene) felt epic or "geniusly" thought out. It just leaves a bad taste in some people's mouths Quote:
But to be fair while this may work for Lelouch on a basic level does it really for Suzaku?
__________________
|
||
2010-04-14, 21:59 | Link #7286 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Quote:
Euphemia offered Suzaku a better alternative but we all know how that turned out. The same thing goes for the disaster that was the Second Battle of Tokyo and how it destroyed any chance for a normal reconciliation between him and Lelouch. It also destroyed what was left of Suzaku's ideals and self-justifications. The plan essentially gave Suzaku what he always wanted...as well as the chance to enact karmic vengeance, whether he still wanted it or not by the end, since even though both of them had reconciled that was only possible after Lelouch had accepted his own responsibility and orchestrated his own murder. Just as well, playing the role of Zero denies Suzaku the escape a heroic death would provide. To redirect his goals towards keeping the temporary peace Lelouch created, at least until the day he dies or something goes wrong, while giving up his past self and any personal aspirations seems fitting given his masochistic nature. Ironically enough though, he'll receive plenty of praise but none of it belongs to him, as a individual, just as a faceless symbol that represents the terrible methods of his former enemy. |
||
2010-04-15, 12:49 | Link #7288 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Nevertheless, I still disagree. I wasn't arguing anything about the nature of Lelouch's killing of Euphemia, but the point is he was still responsible for her death. You have to take into account that, by the end of R2, Suzaku had already abandoned the remains of the ideals that had prevented him from killing Lelouch earlier on. Suzaku didn't kill Lelouch between seasons because, as things turned out, he was planning to become the Knight of One and reform Japan from that position. In other words, at the time he was still trying to "change things from the inside" as opposed to using the "wrong" methods. That changed after episode 18 of R2. Even if Suzaku didn't actively desire to kill Lelouch, which is debatable, he hadn't forgiven him either. That was an unresolved issue between them and a source of tension that needed to be addressed. The fact that Lelouch was willing to die, in part, as a way to make up for what had happened to Euphemia does have a certain karmic value. It is more of an implied aspect, as opposed to an explicit motivation, but that's where the rest of my post comes in. I'm not arguing that's everything. Perhaps "vengeance" isn't the right word, all things considered, but it is one way to settle the score between them, for better or for worse. However, I would say the extremely brief references to Euphemia near the end of episode 21 and in 22 tend to support that part of my argument. |
|
2010-04-15, 13:18 | Link #7289 |
Banned
|
"This cool bishounen with the imba eye who died a heroic death to atone for his sins" killed and tortured billions of people and then killed himself. Why doesn't anyone notice that? Mooks are people too, despite being used as cannon fodder.
If his ZR plan was something he came up with after all the mess he did, I would forgive him a bit. But no, he did all that BECAUSE he wanted to die in the end. It was all intentional. Do you people like the brake eggs to make omelet method? I hate it. |
2010-04-15, 13:24 | Link #7290 | |||
Shameless Fangirl
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 33
|
Quote:
Quote:
I also believe Lelouch was about as responsible for what happened to Euphie as Suzaku was for for firing Fleya. Quote:
It's official that they had forgiven each other, and that it was Lelouch who insisted on his own death out of what Okouchi calls "pride", not Suzaku.
__________________
|
|||
2010-04-15, 13:25 | Link #7291 | |
Um-Shmum
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at GNR, bringing you the truth, no matter how bad it hurts
Age: 39
|
Quote:
fact of life on the OTHER hand, if you are like Lelouch, and can't make an omelet without killing a bunch of people, maybe you should stay out of the kitchen
__________________
|
|
2010-04-15, 13:49 | Link #7294 | |
Shameless Fangirl
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 33
|
Quote:
That explains... so many things...
__________________
|
|
2010-04-15, 13:58 | Link #7295 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
I think I'm being misunderstood here, so let's go over this one more time.
They forgave each other when Lelouch came up with that Zero Requiem plan of his. I've been making that point myself. The difference is that I'm speaking about the show as a whole, as part of a process that culminated in their reconciliation, not just what happened after that point. There was no previous forgiveness, outside of an attempted reconciliation in episode 17 of R2. Most of my argument deals with what came beforehand. Quote:
Quote:
Remember that it was Suzaku who brought up Euphemia in episode 21, after they had dealt with Charles, and he was taking an aggressive stance there. At that particular point, when neither of them had reconciled yet, Suzaku seemed prepared to kill Lelouch. Forgiveness only came afterwards, along with the details of Lelouch's plans and whatever else they talked about. I'm not arguing otherwise, so please re-read what I wrote. Would Suzaku have forgiven his old friend if the plan didn't involve Lelouch's death? Probably not, which is what I consider debatable. Suzaku and Lelouch came to an understanding, off-screen, precisely when they agreed to go through the whole Zero Requiem setup. Ironically, I would say that it's Lelouch's acceptance of a planned death that made Suzaku finally forgive him, but you can't deny that has karmic implications. The Mutuality short story doesn't explain the entire process, unfortunately, which is why there is room for many interpretations about what we didn't see on-screen. I've already said that "vengeance" wasn't the right term to describe it, at least after that point, but this doesn't suddenly eliminate all the previous build-up. Last edited by Xander; 2010-04-15 at 14:09. |
||
2010-04-15, 14:05 | Link #7296 | ||||
Shameless Fangirl
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 33
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||||
2010-04-15, 14:16 | Link #7297 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
I agree, this is very repetitive. But look at the bright side: after the end of next week we'll probably be too busy with the new project to care about all this.
Quote:
But Suzaku himself changed, after episode 18, and not for the better. He was all about going straight for the kill, so to speak, first against Charles and then, potentially, Lelouch if he hadn't come up with ZR (and probably talked about the truth of Euphemia's death, on the side...I'll always regret the show's excessive use of time skips). |
|
2010-04-15, 14:16 | Link #7298 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Actually, Suzaku and Lelouch were already back on good terms while the latter was still thinking about how to deal with Schneizel in the first of the Mutuality short stories. It was moments later that he first said the words "Zero Requiem".
|
2010-04-15, 14:18 | Link #7299 |
Shameless Fangirl
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 33
|
You know, you keep claiming things like this, but I don't see anything repetitive here, except maybe if you mean, "quite some time ago, there already was a similar discussion".
So... please stop saying these things without explaining yourself? It's starting to get a bit, hum. Puzzling. Edit: @Xander: Well, I think we can mostly agree there, though I think the Mutuality stories mostly made up for the time-skips.
__________________
|
2010-04-15, 14:22 | Link #7300 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
You see, the Mutuality short story tells us nothing about what Lelouch said to Suzaku right before the time skip at the end of episode 21. That's important. The details have all been left up in the air and the short story only gives us a partial view of what took place. It's an attempt, after the fact, to fill in those blanks but I don't think that's completely satisfactory when we missed out on their earlier discussions. |
|
|
|