|
View Poll Results: Widescreen monitors. | |||
Yes, I have one. | 43 | 55.84% | |
No, I don't have one. | 12 | 15.58% | |
I don't have one, but intend to get one. | 18 | 23.38% | |
I don't want one at all. | 4 | 5.19% | |
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
2007-05-29, 23:05 | Link #1 |
Nya? ^_^
Fansubber
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
|
Widescreen monitors: Do you have one?
Browsing numerous image threads has made me curious. I still see a lot of people posting 4:3 (and the occasional 5:4) wallpapers they've made or found, which really makes me wonder. How many people don't have widescreen monitors these days?
As far as I've noticed, *most* anime is now broadcast in widescreen. Here in Australia, I can't think of a single TV show made in the past five or more years that isn't in 16:9, either. Of course, movies have been in widescreen formats for many, many years, and DVD releases are usually cropped to 16:9 (from the weird cinema aspect ratios) so really, all visual media is clearly going widescreen. I've had a HDTV for a while now, and also made the upgrade to a widescreen monitor about a year ago. In fact, walking through an electronics store, I haven't even seen a 4:3 monitor or TV for at least a year. Looking on a few national sites that sell computer products only have a bare handful of 4:3 monitors compared to the plethora of 16:10 on the market. Anyway, as I said, what really made me want to ask is that I still see a lot of people making 4:3 wallpapers, when I had assumed most people would be running widescreen desktops these days. So I wanted to put it out there to find out some numbers, at least from this community. ^^ |
2007-05-29, 23:28 | Link #2 |
9wiki
Scanlator
|
Personally, I have a 4:3 monitor at home and a widescreen monitor at work (two of 'em, actually).
It's only in the past year or so that widescreen television sales have taken over the majority of sales, and budget-market computer monitor sales are still overwhelmed by 4:3 products and purchases. Most TV content has made the switch now, but across the world many major productions are still 4:3. The future is clearly widescreen, but it will take some time to TRULY convert. The current install-base of 4:3 equipment can't be so easily discounted, and those who don't understand where the market is heading and the effects that will have on them will continue to buy 4:3 equipment. Personally, I don't buy 4:3 monitors any longer if I have any choice, including at the office. People like my father, however, search for the cheapest equipment that will work "for right now", and continue to perpetuate the 4:3 rule. |
2007-05-30, 05:05 | Link #4 | |
Nya? ^_^
Fansubber
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
As for browsing, I've found a 16:10 desktop to be better than a 4:3 one. It took a few days to get used to, but it really is superior for general desktop use. This way I can have my IM client and music player open on one side of the screen while my browser, text editor or whatever application of choice takes up the rest. Of course, that's just one way I use my desktop; having my HDTV as my secondary monitor means a lot of media gets played on it instead, but it's not hard to find a way that suits you. But still, I do understand some people's reluctance to accept new technologies (for instance, still see most people downloading xvid avi's instead of 264 mkv/mp4s) -- even if it's a bit hard to wrap my head around, I can sometimes fathom reasons people may not want to. No money to simply 'upgrade' is a very valid one. But when it comes time to replace an old 4:3 set, there really is zero reason not to go widescreen, IMO... |
|
2007-05-30, 06:58 | Link #6 |
あ!
|
I bought a 21" widescreen monitor about ~3 months ago. It was the only upgrade for my PC I invested money in since the last 4 years or so but it was well worth it. I couldn't imagine going back to the 17" CRT I had before. I hardly ever play games, so the lack of widescreen support there (I guess most new releases don't come without it anymore anyway?) isn't really an issue for me.
And when it comes to what I use my PC for (browsing, working, music, anime/movies), a widescreen monitor is sooo much better. ^^
__________________
|
2007-05-30, 07:07 | Link #7 | |
♪♫ Maya Iincho ♩♬
Artist
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2007-05-30, 08:20 | Link #8 |
Rei! What have you done!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 46
|
After my 17"CRT main monitor died on me with a big flashing bang and then a puff of smoke, I bought a 20" widescreen monitor..
I also have a 17" monitor as my secondary screen for like my IM, Outlook, Torrent etc and the toolbars for Photoshop, imageready etc wich leaves me with an enormous workspace on my WS.. I'm thinking of buying another bigger widescreen (although a 22"will give me the same resolution I run now nml 1680x1050 and going above that will push the price up like a bastard..) and using the one I have now as a secondary monitor.. never a 4:3 for me again.
__________________
|
2007-05-30, 11:54 | Link #9 | |
Magical Boy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hiding... don't try to find me.
Age: 20
|
Quote:
Newegg link At that size, they're pretty cheap. :/ Anyways, I use both a normal one and a widescreen. So I have an especially wide screen. |
|
2007-05-30, 12:02 | Link #10 |
Thinking outside the box
Graphic Designer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 37
|
I use widescreen 15.4 laptop screen at 1280x800. I like the resolution of it. And thank god i haven't saw a none wide screen anime this season yet. Even though i only follow 3 series from the current season.
I'm secretly hoping for a 70+ cm lcd tv to watch my anime on
__________________
|
2007-05-30, 12:03 | Link #11 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
I bought a 22" Viewsonic VG2230wm a month ago... I love it for both work and play. The only complaint I have is that it is a LONG freaking way from left to right when mousing (heh, they need to have individual mouse tuning for vertical and horizontal now)
__________________
|
2007-05-31, 00:44 | Link #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Well, my wide-screen monitor is practically built on to my laptop. It's a 17-inch plasma wide-screen...and I have to agree with slayer:
Quote:
|
|
2007-05-31, 01:35 | Link #14 |
Tsushima Masaki
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: British Columbia, Canada
|
I mainly use an old 17" CRT, but I do have a 27" LCD 16:9 HDTV that I use for video viewing purposes. It accepts VGA input, so I often use that as a part-time monitor (the graphics card I use has 2 outputs). But of course it's a TV so it can't do high resolutions on it, I think the max is 1280x720, but that's fine with me.
__________________
|
2007-05-31, 01:43 | Link #15 | |
Nya? ^_^
Fansubber
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
A 1920x1200 monitor and 1920x1080 TV is the only way to go. |
|
2007-05-31, 10:14 | Link #17 | |
9wiki
Scanlator
|
Quote:
I'm still waiting for 1080p capable projector prices to come down. |
|
2007-05-31, 13:07 | Link #18 |
You could say.....
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Nope don't have one. But I'm only on laptops 99% of my computing time. I find the widescreen laptops are bit awkward to carry around, the shape just feels ungainly. I've just built a media centre pc but am waiting on the end of Australian financial year to buy a LCD TV that will double as a monitor. I'm torn between 40" but they'll be limited to 1366x768 resolution or 32' with 1080p resolution in my budget. Living in a studio apartment means I can't have too many appliances.
|
2007-06-01, 02:28 | Link #19 | ||
A2000A
Fansubber
|
Quote:
And ironically, quite contrary to your concern for ppl only making 4:3/5:4 wallpapers, the wallpapers on my screens are 16:9 and thus have black bars. =/ (pictures from 5 centimeter per second) Quote:
|
||
2007-06-01, 05:11 | Link #20 |
…Nothing More
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Age: 44
|
Heh, I'm still using an old 22", standard 4:3 format CRT, which has lasted me a very long time. Right now I have no intention of upgrading because the parts of the marketplace I am interested in are so fluid.
Don't get me wrong, I would like a wide format monitor it is just that, for me, the problem isn't simply a matter of selecting the right screen size. I'm more concerned with the transport mechanism between computer and monitor, and how that relates to the other bits of my system I need to buy and upgrade (i.e. the graphics card). I see the choice of system as the primary limiting factor in terms of my current purchasing goals. There are a number of competing systems with different advantages and limitations, each riddled with their own flavour of copy protection. Until they stabilize a bit and the support for all of them is assured across a range of card and monitor vendors, or a clear leader is settled on, I can't see the point in upgrading. Unless something breaks, that is, and I'm forced to upgrade. |
|
|