2013-06-19, 16:03 | Link #1521 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
It's official
No more 24 hour check in (still need internet for intital set up); offline games can be played offline; and no restrictions on lending, trading, selling or renting; no more region lock. Also for disc based games, the discs are no required to play them (which is only natural with the removal of the 24 hour check) unfortunately a lot of PR damage has already been done. Trust is easy to break, but difficult to build; in one month they destroyed the trust they spent a decade building. The reversal is a good move and for the best, but their experiment will haunt them
__________________
|
2013-06-19, 16:04 | Link #1522 |
beyond
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: in the club
|
Don Mattrick: "Remember that comment I made about gamers being backwards? Turns out my company is too! FIRE ME ALREADY"
Major Nelson: "There! You happy now? LEAVE ME ALONE!" Yusuf: *too busy watching TV*
__________________
|
2013-06-19, 16:05 | Link #1523 | |
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
But like the Virtual Boy, I don't think Nintendo has the wrong idea with the touch screen on the Wii U. Personally I find it very convenient for navigating the OS services and it's got some use in games. At the same time, it's just too soon. If the Wii was the NES, the Wii U should have been the SNES: bigger, badder, more refined, with tweaks to the formula instead of trying to reinvent the hardware wheel every generation. It's okay to take those risks, but if you can't even come up with compelling software to demonstrate why the hardware is worth it, no one will care. Which is exactly why the Wii U isn't selling. Touch screen gaming is the future of console gaming, but it's not exciting in a market saturated with touch screens, and apparently not exciting to Nintendo either, since they can't think of any must have software for it. It's a baffling thing how they could not have realized this when developing the hardware. Likewise, Microsoft's DRM was poorly planned. The vision of an all digital future isn't wrong, we're heading that way regardless. But the implementation, the PR behind it, the hubris, and no real compelling reason as to why consumers should want any of what they're selling....that's why the backlash exists. Like Nintendo, people will rush out and buy Xbox One, but because the company can't provide a compelling vision to sell gamers on, it's going to cost them dearly. They've both got the cash to recover, but for this generation, the damage is done before it's even fully underway. Sony must be popping champagne in the boardrooms right now. They couldn't have asked for a better entrance into the next generation.
__________________
|
|
2013-06-19, 16:05 | Link #1524 |
阿賀野型3番艦、矢矧 Lv180
Graphic Designer
Moderator Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Belgium, Brussels
Age: 38
|
That backpedaling surely will relish some people although that will put a huge dent on their credibility whatsoever.
The guys who thought it was a good idea are probably not going to have a promotion.
__________________
|
2013-06-19, 16:06 | Link #1525 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
Quote:
Game discs will no longer be fully installed to hard drives Disc checking is implemented All online verifications are removed The sharing feature is removed These changes aren't trivial, but they shouldn't be all that hard to implement either. The real problem for Microsoft is the other story of the day: that Gamestop has run out of in-store preorders. This means that the PS4 will enjoy an advantage in 2013 sale - probably somewhere in the range of 2:1 to 4:1.
__________________
|
||
2013-06-19, 16:14 | Link #1527 |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
This. This is proof that the customer is always first. MS doesn't have a monopoly in gaming. Even if Sony is gone, we would still have Nintendo holding the fort. MS can't abuse customers when they never had the right to.
__________________
|
2013-06-19, 16:27 | Link #1532 |
Senior Member
|
I certainty am not gonna be rushing out to get one like I was for the 360. If anything I'll either wait for a price drop and get it or assuming Dead Rising 3 is actually good, then I'll consider getting it earlier but I'll still wait cause so far that is the ONLY game I want the x-box one for.
__________________
|
2013-06-19, 16:30 | Link #1535 |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
Apple users have let Apple do this to them for so long it's essentially proven fact that some people want it to be like that. Things like "expensive" or "restricted" are practically features. That won't change unless Apple manages to shoot themselves in the foot, head and ass simultaneously. Which if their new "coffee machine" computer rumor is true may very well be on their way to denting their disgustingly powerful brand.
__________________
|
2013-06-19, 16:48 | Link #1537 |
Senior Member
Author
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
|
There's been PR damage, but it's ridiculous to say it's too late. The consoles aren't even out yet.
The thing stopping me the most now is the price and kinect requirement. I don't want to be spied on, and the 'features' it promotes I don't care for. Getting rid of it would certainly lower the price. But the biggest thing was the shitty drm, so I'm more likely to get one in the future depending on how good of a library it churns out.
__________________
|
2013-06-19, 16:51 | Link #1538 | ||
Easy Muffin
Join Date: Jan 2013
Age: 31
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2013-06-19, 17:00 | Link #1540 |
He Without a Title
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The land of tempura
|
It looks like Microsoft may still have a shoot at this after all. I probably won't consider it anytime soon but at least I don't have to actively discourage anyone who asks me if the console is any good. I honestly don't remember much occasions such as this where a company does a complete 180. Truly one for the school books.
__________________
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|