2011-01-25, 02:03 | Link #21681 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Now you're just being silly. He hid the truth, lionized hiding the truth, refused to commit to whether he had even approached the truth, and the story ended. If you're saying "Well maybe he'll give direct answers in Rei, so you can't say he said he'd never reveal it," all you're doing is making excuses for a hack. You should know better, and you should demand better.
I'm not talking about you if you feel you're not insulted. There's no accounting for taste. But there's a lot of people who do feel insulted, and they are not just raging against the tempest here. There is a lot to be critical of, and for a conclusion it's left a lot of people wondering if there even was a "conclusion" thought out.No, that's just some nonsense you made up to trivialize my opinion. The fact is that there are unnecessary amounts of ambiguity because he did not establish a proper tone of finality, and that's a direct consequence of his dodges leading up to that point. He systematically dismantles any hope of trusting him before finally putting the reader in the situation where now, finally, we need to trust this or that. Maybe you still trusted him by that point, but you shouldn't have.
__________________
|
2011-01-25, 02:06 | Link #21682 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
If you can't accept those answers, that's one thing. But pretending he didn't give them to us is quite another.
__________________
|
|
2011-01-25, 02:08 | Link #21683 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
What EP8 essentially did was it verified that EP3-6 were Tooya's writing, possibly using Battler's memories. So we can hold on to something else now. Anyways, I really don't see EP8 telling us to 'draw your own conclusions.' Because from the start, Rokkenjima Prime never really concerned us... only the things Beatrice wanted to tell us. Now we know, there are more things Battler, via Tooya, wanted to tell us too. Or tell Beatrice/Ange, and by extension us too. |
|
2011-01-25, 02:08 | Link #21684 | ||
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
And just to be clear, the difference here is that there are some things that need to be told and some things that might just be better without. "What was Battler doing all those years?" is not necessarily something we have to know, and in fact, anything that we think up in our heads is probably better than what we wound up actually being told. My problem is really that he told us things he should have shown us, made certain things too ambiguous that needed to be clear, and made things that could have been left ambiguous clear to no particular benefit for the story.
__________________
|
||
2011-01-25, 02:14 | Link #21685 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
Don't get me wrong. There were things I definitely disliked about EP8. It felt rushed and relied too much on Ange making some really moronic choices in the middle. Beato and Battler's ending was perfect, but felt out of place with the focus of the ep, ect, ect. But I'm not upset because Ryukishi decided to forgo the traditional "line up the suspects and exposition dump at them for fifteen pages."
__________________
|
|
2011-01-25, 02:17 | Link #21686 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
No, he never hid the truth, he never lionized hiding the truth. He told us from the beginning, that the truth lay not in the events of Rokkenjima Prime but in the mind of Beatrice. That was our primary concern. Where did the events of Rokkenjima Prime even come into play except for the end of EP7 and the middle of EP8? "all you're doing is making excuses for a hack." <-- So, you resort to insults now, in order to support your argument? I mean, if you want to rage, go ahead, just troll. But, don't expect people to agree with you just because you are being vehement. "You should know better, and you should demand better." <-- I'm sorry, but I'm quite satisfied at this point. If he refuses to give any more answers in the future, then I may have some gripes, but I don't see EP8 as the end yet. End of the character development, yes. And end of the story too. But not the end of the answers. This is because my main interest in Umineko isn't Rokkenjima Prime. That's like asking how the Heisenberg Compensator work in Star Trek. It's silly. |
|
2011-01-25, 02:18 | Link #21687 | |||
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
Basically, it could have been exactly the same rundown as <insert theory here>, but conveyed in a fashion which made clear that this memory, whatever it happened to be, was "it." If that was his intention, he shot himself in the foot for me with some of the shoddiness, melodrama, and excess leading up to it. "Amnesia!" is just the unpleasant icing on the squash-flavored cake. I mean hey, it's still cake, but there's going to be a lot of it left over once the folks in the office who really like squash get their pieces. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
2011-01-25, 02:23 | Link #21688 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
So, finding Beatrice's motive wasn't really our clear objective from the beginning.
__________________
|
|
2011-01-25, 03:01 | Link #21690 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
Our leaving it at the question was probably the mistake. (I notice that when we're uncertain, we leave it at a question and stop thinking... we don't follow things to their logical conclusion. (And when I say we, I don't mean us fine people on the board , I mean, us in general, as humans.)) Basically, it couldn't have been Eva nor Ange. Eva because she seemed to be the head of a company and not a writer, nor Ange because she was very young. Mystery Writer and Battler were the only two shown to have literary inclinations, specifically mystery inclinations. Anyways, it very well could be there were some things that failed to satisfy you. I don't doubt that. But it really does seem that I read a different story (or picked up different lessons from the story) than you. I think you should understand that's why I can't agree with you. Quote:
But, that's what I mean, it's not the end for me. I remember Higurashi Rei still dealt very seriously with the conclusion of the story. That is the story was 'finished' and the puzzle was undone... (rather than a mystery)... but there was still a little left with Rika and Hanyuu's characterization. Umineko has ended its character development and ended its story. I really don't see anywhere for him to put in more, except for.... no, it's like all the characters are totally accounted for. That's all I really see EP8 doing. I think even I was under the mistaken impression that he would provide all the answers here. But now that I recall, he kept saying that he would reveal little by little in his interviews, to allow people to figure out things. So, I'm thinking that EP8, or the whole 'Chiru' series is this little-by-little reveal. Because he's done this, I think he's thinking that if he reveals all the answers, it means the total end to the fun in Umineko. So, I still expect him to announce when he'll do that... Honestly, I'm kinda glad we don't have everything yet; there's some things I'm still thinking about. See below. Quote:
But, maybe it was necessary, unfortunately. My theory is this, that Battler Prime very well knew the things that were going on on the island, to nearly the same level as Yasu, enough to allow Tooya to be able to write even more in detail. I've been thinking that Yasu must have been aware of that there was someone out to really murder. And that she was trapped, because of this. This is because her stories take this into account! If she writes about it, it means she must know it. And this is separate from Yasu's idea that the siblings were capable of spontaneous murder. Ok, so Tooya is able to fish out Battler's memories and write EP3-6. This is why I said he's suspicious; not that he's a culprit but that he must have known something was wrong. This is because despite losing his memories of the incident, he is still able to write to enough detail after only two EP regarding the staging of the murders. The writing is the proof of knowledge. And I think that he was taking action in going back, rather than just blithely going along with Rudolf. Meta and Piece Battler may have been portrayed as idiots, but they were sometimes portrayed as smart. I think Battler Prime knew more than Yasu gave him credit for. So it must be something vitally important that the both of them knew and were taking action on... although maybe not co-ordinated action. By the way, I've never understood why Yasu said she was trapped. And Meta-Battler in EP5, after he figured it out, said that he realized that she was the one who was long suffering; not him. It was said that she couldn't leave the island, right? I mean, it couldn't really be her disfigurement (if there was one), or her inheriting the head-ship. It sounds like she was the boss afterwards. What reasons are there for people to have to remain on an island? Or with the family who's not even there most of the year? |
|||
2011-01-25, 03:08 | Link #21691 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
I was working on piercing the Meta World since EP2, when I saw that it was 'Shannon' who was ordered to write Kinzo's will. It reminded me of how authors like to stick author characters in their novels; so I suspected that Shannon was a writer of some kind. (You see this in manga too; sometimes you see characters being mangaka.) EP3 made me suspicious since George and Shannon's relationship basically progressed. So I kept telling my friends that there was something extremely wrong with that. Basically it didn't fit the kakera pattern from Higurashi. This was all around EP4 time, since I marathoned EP1-4 in about a week. I couldn't sleep properly for a day or two. My mind kept going, sorting out all the information... |
|
2011-01-25, 03:11 | Link #21692 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's really funny because I ended up taking side I used to really dislike at first, like the Mystery side and the Author Theory. Which, is really ironic considering I was seriously thinking about dropping Umineko by the time I re-read EP6.
__________________
|
||
2011-01-25, 03:18 | Link #21693 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
I wish I could be that forgiving.
Quote:
/quote/ Most of the game's content is made up and irrelevant. The author's self-insert Mary Sue won the game. Who reads it as a mystery is trolled by it not being one, who reads it as fantasy is trolled by metaworld not existing, who tries to accept both is trolled twice. The whole thing is strange as hell. Plot holes everywhere, like he didn't finish in time or something. For example, all the stuff with Yasu, Jessica, George, all of the potential for exploring Kyrie and Rudolf's motivation, stuff that Umineko needed to end well, was completely discarded. I had taken into account the motivations of every character, and basically this episode said FUCK YOU THEY WERE RED HERRINGS. The very nature of Yasu NECESSITATES explanations of Jessica, George, and the servants motives, and yet instead of taking advantage of the thousands of ways in which he could have done something cool with the varying issues of the family, he goes with the most mundane motive and the most clichéd plot device. This is a clueless mystery. Which would be fine, if Ryu didn't spend 7 episodes acting like everything would come together in some way. Bern was basically right all along, you can't even blame her for ridiculing the whole thing. /unquote/ So, basically, R07 left two choices for you: to play the “draw your own conclusions” game, which roughly translates to “eat up that shite, pigs/goats, and ask for seconds”, or to try salvaging whatever is salvageable from that ambiguous mess and come up with your own “best fit” solution. I prefer the latter. I’ll have my proper mystery ending irregardless of whether R07 would be so kind as to provide one (or, more realistically, if he bothered to prepare one in the first place). This is a matter of principle and taste, really, and I’ll uphold mine. As things stand now, I prefer “Battler is the R-prime” culprit because it's the best I can come up with from what I’m given. But it may be space aliens or Bigfoot tomorrow, if new information comes up that somehow supports that better. I don’t even have to try that hard, as long as it gives Umineko proper closure, hell, any closure. The people who see the desire for closure as something unnatural baffle me, nor do I see any obligation to prove anything to people like that. This is not my problem. That was/is R07 problem all along.
__________________
|
|
2011-01-25, 03:24 | Link #21694 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
i think the adult always solve the epitapt in all the games except ep6 thats why they made it through the second day.
in all ep,the bomb is always set ON so if they didn't solve the epitapt boom the bomb explode,just like in ep6. but still they all die the second day.so it means that the culprit is one of the adult who got greedy and want the gold by themselves. the culprit is kyrie or rudolf or maybe both of them?.i come to the conclusion after i read ep1,i remember rudolf saying he might get killed tonight.isn't that a bit suspicios that he knows what gonna happened that night? battler was never killed by the culprit because rudolf doesn't want battler to be killed. |
2011-01-25, 03:48 | Link #21695 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
Quote:
So, the strategy is, tell someone you're going to give them a super hard puzzle. Then tell them the answer. Then, watch as they say, "Nahhhhh..." 8) I saw this happening in the last Van Dine novel I read a few weeks back too. He basically told us the answer. Then led us around, springing up possible 'suspects' that didn't fit the original clue. Quote:
I mean, that wasn't all there was to the Author Theory. No one could believe in the Author Theory, not even me, until I pointed out how historians show that people, cultures, civilizations, buildings or other things once existed even though they were wiped out. By how they were referred to by other people. If you were to think of this as science, you would only rely on the primary resources for proof. The only way "anything goes" was if Yasu, and now Battler/Tooya were writing with no structure in mind. But this isn't true since we can see things in EP1 and 2 that validate future episodes, for example. Quote:
I didn't think Kyrie was a psychopath as EP7's Tea Party portrayed her, but from this I was disturbed to think that should she 'imagine' that the only outcomes would lead to murder, she could free herself to act first. And of course people would think she's a psychopath for doing so. 8) |
||||
2011-01-25, 04:10 | Link #21696 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
Personally, I always kept on changing my thoughts and attitudes depending on the information presented. If there was something I found weird but didn't have any proper explanation for it, I typed it in a note-pad file I had. I remember I also had other files (I say "had," because all my info got lost, since my PC broke) for theories I didn't like (narrative-wise), just in case. I honestly don't have any problems with obvious answers and being lead into thinking otherwise. I've read some detective novels like that as well, and I personally liked them. Although, I wouldn't call Umineko's answer as obvious, since even if ShKanon was relatively easy to spot, the whole deal about personalities/alter-egos/imaginary friends/whatever being able to die and acknowledged in the Red as such was rather contrived, in my opinion. So, even if we could make a case about there being hints, the idea itself is not particularly logical, in my opinion, for most people to even come up with that idea - and I don't remember anyone suggesting it either. Moreover, I just couldn't like the answers presented by R07, nor did I like the story after EP5. The lack of certainty at the end didn't really make it any better. But well, that's all there is to it. I guess my expectation were too high. Perhaps, that's my fault for my lack of enjoyment at the end. Who knows? As for why I still have the need to speak about it if I didn't like it at the end? I suppose doing it brings me some catharsis. That, and I do enjoy making crack theories, and do some actual theorising.
__________________
|
|
2011-01-25, 04:18 | Link #21697 |
The True Culprit
|
Really I just find all this absolutely hilarious since we were told since forever ago that we weren't going to be told the answers on everything.
"Shit, he really meant it when he said we had to find our own answers? Well fuck that, I thought he was going to change his mind." Chill the hell out, guys. At this point the complaining is starting to go into very petty and whiny territory. At no point were we ever promised a "Solution" and there was a significant amount of foreshadowing for the catbox remaining closed forever; add on that the "mystery is solvable with EPS 1-4" and how Rokkenjima Prime is like non-existent at that point in the narrative and like, well... I don't know, maybe my existence is skewed to hell because all my favorite stories are stuff that rely on the userbase filling the blanks themselves, so Umineko's just sort of par for the course. Or maybe I just subconsciously decided that the ride was so fucking awesome that Ryu's allowed a bungled ending, since he made such an epic story I'm not confidant on how he could conclude it much better.
__________________
|
2011-01-25, 07:52 | Link #21698 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Many times he said that it was a game between him and his readers. I will always wonder what kind of ending we would have received if he felt that his readers understood his story. (The goats indicate otherwise)
Beatrice's cat box will forever rest at the bottom of the sea. I'm satisfied with it but what would that image look like if he were just a troll? Spoiler for Secret Ryukishi Troll Ending:
__________________
|
2011-01-25, 09:18 | Link #21699 | ||||
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Have you considered the possibility that you're giving a pass on otherwise indefensible literary techniques because you did like it?
Quote:
Ironic that you then launched into a discussion of rewriting history. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Still, I'm not actually mad. Mad is when I PM you something that makes you stop speaking to me. I'm just passionate, like a swarthy matador.
__________________
|
||||
2011-01-25, 11:26 | Link #21700 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
No literary technique is indefensible as long as its done well. And, yes, before you answer, not every technique used in Umineko is done well. But a lot of the ones you're decrying read emotionally true and are handled nicely, which is all I demand from my pulp entertainment when the day is done.
__________________
|
|
|