2006-03-01, 16:00 | Link #21 |
Ace Archer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 36
|
omg the first 5 minutes where great, awesome action andship battle, i was expecting more,
a head strong female led battleship, cool action great storyline BUT, wtf all i got was 'tactical' shots of a camera panning from ass to tits, which always had erect nipples, obviuos plot, that male tech falls in love with pilot and gets closer to his sister blah blah, i thought i was gonna get a good action anime with a bit of a storyline but i got a fanservice anime =[ , ahwell |
2006-03-01, 23:00 | Link #22 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
A harem anime based on a warship makes about as much sense as snakes on a plane. That said, I agree that it could be interesting if they calm down a bit with the fan service.
One question though, have they addressed why there is a very large shortage of men? I'm not even talking about in the main cast, but in at least 2 scenes in ep 1 (on the Ariplane and the Beach) there doesn't look like there is a single male, to be seen even in the backround. The airport did have some guys however it looked like the male population was about 1/3 of the female population. Can anyone tell me if this is a part of the storyline, or if this is just a factor in most harem animes that I for some reason didn't notice. |
2006-03-01, 23:14 | Link #23 |
Anime-Ken
|
Most of the men were killed by all those boobs that keep flying around. >.>
There's the Tomboy(TM), Super-smart Loli(TM), Older "Lusty" female(TM), Older "Wise and calm" female(TM)... Did I miss anyone? :\ Here I was, ready for something along the lines of Tide Blue Line, which showed that Navel-centered anime can be done and done very well. I should have caught up on more Otome episodes instead. |
2006-03-02, 00:32 | Link #24 | |
Wanchu!
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
Overall, the anime seems kind of generic to me, the animation is a bit weak, and the CG sequences are pretty bad. I'm still glad I got a chance to see it subbed though. I guess since there was fanservice, it wasn't a total loss. If you wanna read my full rant about Tactical Roar, it's here. Otherwise, the previous paragraph pretty much sums up how I feel. |
|
2006-03-02, 00:55 | Link #25 | |
I am mowing clowns
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
Otherwise…. |
|
2006-03-02, 06:38 | Link #26 | |
GWAAAA!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Philippines
|
Quote:
Anyway, so far Tactical Roar is a great series combining action, comedy, and drama in a well balanced mix for yet another harem series, and for someone like me who's usually not into action/sci-fi (I'm into pure romance stuff like Canvas 2 and Lamune), this one is an exception. Last edited by Sailor Enlil; 2006-03-02 at 07:09. |
|
2006-03-02, 06:53 | Link #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
Well, simple explanation as to why alot of people say that "theres too much fanservice" would probably be due to: 1) They want more story progression than pantsu shots, even if they do enjoy the shots nonetheless. 2) Thy're jumping on the bandwagon of critisizing shows that have fanservice, hence hypocrite. On-topic: Not sure if I'll pick up this title...maybe when the subs pick up. |
|
2006-03-02, 11:00 | Link #29 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
Quote:
In other words: Plot = Good Plot + Fan Service = Great Fan Service – Plot = Not Good |
|
2006-03-02, 13:53 | Link #30 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-03-02, 14:16 | Link #32 | |
I am mowing clowns
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
I'm a huge fan of the first season of Slayers TV. I love lowbrow animation...the lower the frame rate the better sometimes. I like this show quite a bit. I merely thought the animation could have been better in spots. It's not as bad as Love Love or Koi Koi Seven, but merely making one critical comment on the animation quality doesn't condemn the show. It's fine and my comments are purely subjective. I tend to view each show on it’s own merits. Cheers. |
|
2006-03-02, 21:23 | Link #36 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Malaysia
Age: 46
|
The whole argument about criticizing the art, animation, fanservice, etc. of an anime series probably comes from the fact that some people watch too much anime that they develop certain taste and expectations. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion though.
|
2006-03-03, 04:03 | Link #37 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 38
|
Tactical Roar is like Vandread, a vessel/ship operated by beautiful girls with a few men onboard fighting the enemy, don't you think? Lots of Ecchi, comedy and action!
The only difference is Vandread is in Space! Tactical Roar is at Sea! And of course, Men are not fighting Women in tactical roar like in Vandread. I would say that is the main reason why i enjoy Tactical Roar is due to the similarities of Vandread. Last edited by AniReaver; 2006-03-03 at 10:07. |
2006-03-03, 04:14 | Link #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Age: 44
|
I watched ep 1 and didn't get interested at all. I read some post back there that it was getting interesting around ep 8-9. I hope it does so. My impression of the ep 1 is that everything was pointless... even the fanservice. I like fanservice but the was it was presented in this ep sux.
__________________
|
2006-03-08, 16:26 | Link #39 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Hi!
Fresh back from watching the subbed ep 2, and currently having a beast of a time tracking down live torrents of the early raws (which is what happens when the subs are seven eps behind...) No hints, please - don't want to get banned, and I've already got most of them downloading as is. I can live with the gaps until subs are available. ANYWAY... I say so what if the fanservice is blatant - that's the whole point! The clichés are only overdone to those who pretty much watch everything on the air, and who really should get a life... I'm watching this because I like mecha shows, and this one has mecha that are at least passably realistic, even if the crew's personalities aren't. Hell, in its own way, it's more realistic than Zipang - because unlike that show, I can't categorically point to blatantly wrong technical details, like the seriously screwy armament of the Mirai, and how it looks like two different ships depending on whether you're looking at it from the front or rear... (which is a separate rant that I should really post in the appropriate forum, instead of here.) I have one plot-related issue so far, though: Why on earth would the crew of a chartered privateer vessel get punished for *damage* on a returned stolen vessel? I'd have expected the military to have "sink on sight" orders for the ship in the first place, just to get it out of enemy hands - getting it back at all would be considered a huge bonus. Historically, capturing an enemy ship and bringing it back home would have netted the crew (not the owners, just the ship's captain and crew) 10% of the vessel's value as prize money, to divide amongst themselves. Unless it was their chartered mission to do it, damages would have been deducted before their prize money... Also, regardless of what position that fat buffoon that was manhandling the XO held (was he a representative of the client, or the ship's owners?), had I been the captain I'd have told him to get off and walk home if he disagreed with my course of action - and at the very least, he'd have returned ashore escorted directly from the brig by the (wo)man-at-arms.... At sea, it's the captain's ship, period. SP |
|
|