2013-12-02, 22:10 | Link #1102 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
|
And I'll just keep reiterating, you guys are far too naive about how willing governments and militaries are to use nuclear weapons, if not for the concern of arms escalation. Environmental impact or even civilian casualties can have very little weight depending on the severity of the threat to sovereignty. You don' think the world governments are pushing for "environmental conservation" out of the goodness of their hearts and because they recognize that humans must save the Earth, do you?
I included those. Russians have a fair number of nuclear subs, and so do a number of other countries, like China. Quote:
They also pose little contamination risk compared to Fukusima or Chernobyl. It's just easy to worry about them in peacetime. |
|
2013-12-03, 00:07 | Link #1103 | |||||
Detective
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 36
|
Quote:
They don't shoot back because being told to. We have seen a few hot-headed ships by now who will probably care less about that outdated command from the AC when they start shining during the night. Quote:
Quote:
Keeping a country save using nukes matters very little when everything left is ashes. Quote:
Which brings me to the question what it is that makes you think that the authors don't overestimate it either. Quote:
You are free to enlighten us about the fallout radius of several H-bombs in city size at any time- because that is what you'd probably need to get through an energy shield of unknown strength in the first place.
__________________
|
|||||
2013-12-03, 01:19 | Link #1104 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
|
On the subs, whoever wrote on it, is not underestimating anything, unless whatever article implied anything more than very local contamination. As I've said, it is easy to worry about such things in peacetime. It's easy to worry about very local problems in peacetime. And it If you were at war, it wouldn't be given as much weight. People's priorities change when your way of life is at stake, you know.
Quote:
They didn't even have mental models before, if anything it is more likely now than when the Fog first appeared that such escalation will occur...and it's only now that humans have a weapon that (beyond shadow of doubt as far as story verified info goes) can threaten the Fog. Quote:
For a 50 MT 2-stage thermonuke bomb that can flatten everything in a 20km radius, and assuming wind speeds of up to 25km/h, fallout equivalent to 200 rads will cover a range with a maximum distance of about 300km. In nautical terms, barely any distance at all. The fallout undersea is less measurable, but judging from nuclear accidents resulting in leaks or from nuclear tests, it's barely anything either. In fact, probably much less than air distribution. Lighter elements get diffused over a very wide area while heavier elements simply sink. The amount that would consequently get absorbed by sea life would be far less than say, Fukushima. I think more sea life would die from the initial blast than long-term effects. Some air currents will carry radioactive material around the globe no matter what. When push comes to shove, smarter people than us recognize that raising the Earth's average radioactivity even as much as a 100 rads is probably acceptable. Living things, including humans, have survived in areas of supposedly high radioactivity for millions of years. Not all radioactive regions are unnatural. People will survive. I'd be more concerned about the destruction of technology and possible nuclear winter than fallout, because the former two are much less localized and have a much greater effect on human life. Last edited by DLRevan; 2013-12-03 at 03:13. |
||
2013-12-03, 13:38 | Link #1107 |
〜(^∇^〜) (〜^∇^)〜
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
This is completely random, but for the submarine buffs out there:
They found the wreckage of the I-400 http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...0JI07L20131203 |
2013-12-03, 15:58 | Link #1108 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
|
Quote:
Agreed on that, because the drama cd is pretty obvious about it. Where's the evidence in 49 though? |
|
2013-12-03, 17:11 | Link #1110 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
|
Quote:
Still, I can't explain Yamato knowing if that's the case. Maybe Iona is not reporting everything, but only what she wants to. Like something a little more informal than a subordinate relationship. Seems pretty roundabout if that's the case, though that makes Iona a sort of player too. |
|
2013-12-03, 17:26 | Link #1111 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
I think from very begenning Iona was given right do as she pleases by Yamato. At least in drama CD she was just sent to verify if humans have merit and than just decided hang on with Gunzou.
Yamato is type that gives her subordinates plenty of freedom. |
2013-12-03, 18:20 | Link #1112 | ||
Detective
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 36
|
Quote:
That being said I said we have seen hot-headed Mental models (the one in the last chapter is a good example) not the the entire fleet is. Other than that said weapon can't pass through Klein fields, while enough nukes would probably be able to do that. Quote:
that being said the green circle is the Radiation radius at 500 rads - which is indeed rather small. If you acivate the fallout checkbox(yes you have to activate that separetly) you get an entirely different picture on a much larger scale though(for the surface burst). - the fallout shown there is at 15 mph wind btw If you take that as a reference and consider that you will probably have to shoot several of these at Kongou alone who will definitely not sit idle at the same spot. So with her top speed you'd have several overlapping ones. I'd have to check the places we have seen fog ships, but placing the ep center near the coast of nagasaki would give a 10 rad/hr fallout up to the Hiroshima region depending on the wind direction (you can drag drop that) The actual 1000 rads/hr radius is smaller than 300km though, yes. Aye, Yamato wanting a second opinion sounds perfectly plausible.
__________________
Last edited by AC-Phoenix; 2013-12-03 at 19:16. |
||
2013-12-03, 19:08 | Link #1113 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
When Gunzou is on the I401, if Yamato has direct observational powers over everything Iona does, Yamato knows exactly where he is at all times. However, even if both mental models know he's heading for the wreck of Hyuuga, there's no active Fog ship under her direct monitoring with him. The stalker part of Yamato is all like "No! I must know where he is at all times and he must be accompanied by a Fog ship." and then sends Yukikaze after him. If we think of Yamato like an obsessive girlfriend underneath the cool and calmness, it might make a little sense. |
|
2013-12-03, 20:33 | Link #1117 | |
Detective
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Well he will need to... he needs Nanomaterial for Takao's new hull :/
__________________
|
|
2013-12-03, 20:35 | Link #1118 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
Quote:
I doubt about that, He had I-401, then got Takao, then lost Takao than get (probably) half of Hyuuga ( or maybe Takao again if she return?). That's not what I would call steady growth of fleet... |
|
2013-12-04, 00:42 | Link #1119 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
|
Quote:
Quote:
Ah yes, Hakugei. Maybe she can be Gunzou's gofer ship or something. Last edited by DLRevan; 2013-12-04 at 03:10. |
||
2013-12-04, 02:17 | Link #1120 |
The Northern Guy
|
I would like to see Vampire get a MT see what kind of personality it will have. Repulse had to constantly tell it to stop shooting and concentrate on running away, so Vampire seems like a little ball of aggression but controlled aggression since she held course no matter what.
Reading that bit made me think of Taffy 3 at the battle Samar were a handful of destroyers toke on a main Japanese battle fleet and inflict heavier loses onto them then they received.
__________________
|
Tags |
action, comedy, sci-fi, seinen |
|
|