2009-04-07, 00:11 | Link #2121 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 35
|
Well Islamist in the UN have been bullying everybody, stripping freedom of speech and expression. As a pundit said, it's scary when you combine not being able to question a religion that says it is one thats the truth. Even if its a nonbinding resolution, the possiblity of the UN becoming an enforcer of antifreedom legislation is a scary thought. If there were another war it will not be between china and us. It will be those that value freedom and those that choose to suppress it.
|
2009-04-07, 00:42 | Link #2122 | |
♪♫ Maya Iincho ♩♬
Artist
|
Obama Seeks to Abolish World's Nukes
http://news.aol.com/main/obama-presi...weapons/412784
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2009-04-07, 01:55 | Link #2124 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
I think he probably meant that US is the only country to use nukes and blast 1.2 million people into quantum bits 64 years ago.
__________________
|
|
2009-04-07, 02:14 | Link #2126 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Since NK has built a MRBM, it would be probably that terrorists would want to buy the blueprints for the missile. It went further than predicted (due to wind direction and forward momentum probably). I would like to see how immortal Kim's paeans are when we drop a 550Kt warhead in Pyongyang.
__________________
|
|
2009-04-07, 02:20 | Link #2127 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Quote:
Hooray for green movement Nuclear fallout is nasty and have lasting effects. They should be replaced by environmentally-friendly MOABs and the other russian equivalent - FOAB. |
|
2009-04-07, 02:23 | Link #2128 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: PMB Headquarters
|
Quote:
It sounds quite reasonable yet it makes no sense. Perhaps, people who don't understand the situation regarding United Nations and the mentioned nations would find that this belief carries a rather logical understanding. However, if you do know what is going on,, then this makes absolutely no sense at all. |
|
2009-04-07, 03:06 | Link #2129 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Age: 39
|
Quote:
|
|
2009-04-07, 05:10 | Link #2130 | ||
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
It would be easier to use the name thermobaric weapons. Quote:
DISCLAIMER : The puns in the above paragraph are unintentional. All words matches are purely coincidental.
__________________
Last edited by SaintessHeart; 2009-04-07 at 05:23. Reason: Disclaimer added. |
||
2009-04-07, 07:02 | Link #2131 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 35
|
Quote:
|
|
2009-04-07, 14:42 | Link #2134 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
I would say, keep the arsenal there, just in case of an alien invasion. Even if we get wiped out, at least those grays get hit by the best of the most primitive weapon we have.
__________________
|
|
2009-04-07, 14:49 | Link #2135 | |
Μ ε r c ü r υ
Join Date: Jun 2004
|
Quote:
And, coming from US, interesting that you mention those ideas. Especially when your country is a country that gives the biggest support to such despotic regimes for your sake, so that you can enjoy your freedom of speech in your country. And I don't think there were many critics of those politics, until the Sep. 11 attacks. So, it is not tyranny when those people are pushed towards that non-tolerating boundaries by the politics in your country (towards inhuman living conditions), but it is tyranny when the result your politics created in other countries is affecting your freedom of speech. |
|
2009-04-07, 15:04 | Link #2136 | ||
Aria Company
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2009-04-07, 15:04 | Link #2137 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: PMB Headquarters
|
Quote:
We cannot push the United States to abolish nukes, when China is increasing the number of nukes they are making, while Iran are currently testing to make some successful nukes. North Korea is trying to improve their nuclear capabilities. Russia, on the other hand has 600 more nukes than the United States at a number of 2800. If the United States suddenly declares that their nation will abolish nukes, it would only mean disadvantage to their national security, not mentioning a severe tarnish of their military influence, as well as political influence since they will no longer be capable of utilizing the idea of "mutually-assured destruction" to prevent a war involving nukes. Thus, I support the abolishment of nukes yet I can understand that the United States cannot do so, unless every other nation supports the same ideal and are willing to cooperate in making a world free of nukes. |
|
2009-04-07, 15:04 | Link #2138 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Controversies such as these often make me question the sanctity of life : so those who do not believe in what you do should not have the right to live? So there can be only one model of thought, and people who don't adhere should die? There is no real value to life in modern society. Nobody cares what others believe in anymore, so long that they do not share the same thought, the person is an enemy of your group of believers. That is probably why wars never end! If only we are willing to accept each other for our differences, the world would be a better place. Since we have inflexible minds such as the Taleban, and manipulative ones of the politicians and religious leaders, I propose 3 enforcements for world peace. 1. Ban religion. Nobody is allowed to practice religion. 2. All resistance are not to be enslaved, but rather used as test subjects for the betterment of the human race. 3. Excesses of subjects are to be killed, then their bodies are to be made into fertiliser for agriculture. After all, recycling is one of the keys to a better world. Would you like it? I don't mind.
__________________
|
|
2009-04-07, 15:37 | Link #2139 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Age: 39
|
Quote:
I will pay attention to these islamic dictatorships in the hijacked human rights council when they practice what they preach..religous tolerance. Give me a few churches in Saudi somebody as a fair trade for that megamosque thats going to lie in London. Ah yes, those poor 9/11 whackos, pushed to desperation by their growing anger because of events in Palestine etc. Guess what, a little meddling here and there is nothing in comparison to their lust for a global ummah, the true goal of the fanatics. |
|
2009-04-07, 15:51 | Link #2140 | ||
Μ ε r c ü r υ
Join Date: Jun 2004
|
Quote:
Quote:
That kind of grouping, I believe, is not fair. Many people living in those dictatorships suffer more than you can imagine. And, in many cases, there is nothing those people can do, because the governments of those freedom-lovers all around the world support those dictatorships. And, those people may be the ones that would show tolerance towards another religions, but of course cannot do anything because of the consequences. If you start hurting those people, it will only help you strengthen those dictatorships, by giving them the argument they need to limit that tolerance. And in the current religiously polarized world I doubt that is something you would want to encourage. |
||
Tags |
current affairs, discussion, international |
|
|