AnimeSuki Forums

Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Go Back   AnimeSuki Forum > Anime Discussion > Older Series > Retired > Retired M-Z > Umineko

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-10-16, 09:06   Link #1301
Workworkwork
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: a better place than here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ssol View Post
The red text regarding Beatrice's motives and the murders again are:
The purpose is not to make you feel fear.
It is not to get revenge on someone either.
Beato is not committing murders for pleasure.

I think what Virgilia meant was: Why did Beatrice show the murders to Battler the way she did from the meta world?

Question: Why couldn't Beatrice summon a meta world version of Battler during episode 1 when he first started denying the witch if she has absolute control? She had to wait until he died. To me, this displays a lack of control, at least until episode 1 ends.

I agree, there must be something that represents Beatrice in the real world. However, from episode 4, it cannot be a human and it must be able to kill.

That's an interesting theory that Lambda is also represented as an external power source on the gameboard. Before trying to understand what Lambda could be or what real world relationship Lambda has to Beatrice we need to know what Beatrice is first. At least we have some clues to that.

It -can- be human. Just not technically, as she IS the Ushiromiya family's furniture, after all! *Cackle**Cackle*
Workworkwork is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 10:02   Link #1302
Jan-Poo
別にいいけど
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
Quote:
I agree, there must be something that represents Beatrice in the real world. However, from episode 4, it cannot be a human and it must be able to kill.
Depends on the part you look at.

If you take the part where Battler talks directly to Beatrice, you can't really deny the fact that Beatrice is human. It doesn't really matter if her "real name" isn't Beatrice. There isn't such a thing as a "real name", names are just labels, you can use whichever you like as long it is clear which is the subject you are referring to. The person who acts as Beatrice in the real world is Beatrice.

If you take the part of the final riddle then you are compelled to think Beatrice isn't human, Because Battler is alone. and yet Beatrice kills him.

Ther is one way to make sense out of this, using Beatrice's own words:

Names are not exclusive

Or using Bern's own words: Beatrice (the one in the metaworld) doesn't represents a single person. So maybe she represents a person, two persons, or more things that share the same name. In that case she can use "I" for anything that she represents.
__________________

Jan-Poo is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 10:03   Link #1303
Workworkwork
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: a better place than here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan-Poo View Post
Depends on the part you look at.

If you take the part where Battler talks directly to Beatrice, you can't really deny the fact that Beatrice is human. It doesn't really matter if her "real name" isn't Beatrice. There isn't such a thing as a "real name", names are just labels, you can use whichever you like as long it is clear which is the subject you are referring to. The person who acts as Beatrice in the real world is Beatrice.

If you take the part of the final riddle then you are compelled to think Beatrice isn't human, Because Battler is alone. and yet Beatrice kills him.

Ther is one way to make sense out of this, using Beatrice's own words:

Names are not exclusive

Or using Bern's own words: Beatrice (the one in the metaworld) doesn't represents a single person. So maybe she represents a person, two persons, or more things that share the same name. In that case she can use "I" for anything that she represents.
Bern was just desensitizing Beato's actions. I don't trust a thing she says.
Workworkwork is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 10:05   Link #1304
Jan-Poo
別にいいけど
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
Bern never lies. She might trick you or deceive you, but she never lied once.
__________________

Jan-Poo is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 10:10   Link #1305
Workworkwork
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: a better place than here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan-Poo View Post
Bern never lies. She might trick you or deceive you, but she never lied once.
I didn't say she lied, did I?

She twisted who Beatrice was so that Battler would be more motivated to quickly finish her off. Since he was incompetent, she sent in ANGE to make the twisted truth clearer.
Workworkwork is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 13:00   Link #1306
Used Can
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan-Poo View Post
Ther is one way to make sense out of this, using Beatrice's own words:

Names are not exclusive
That doesn't really get around the red. Beatrice said there was no one in the island but Battler, she's not Battler, and she also said no one could have interfered. So, I don't think a human could have killed him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan-Poo View Post
Beatrice (the one in the metaworld) doesn't represents a single person. So maybe she represents a person, two persons, or more things that share the same name.
Not necessarily just people. I believe Beatrice may represent many different things.
__________________
"The name is Tin; Used is just an alias. I'm everything Shoe Box would like to be." - Used Can of the Aluminium Kingdom
Used Can is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 14:00   Link #1307
Jan-Poo
別にいいけど
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
Quote:
Originally Posted by Used Can View Post
That doesn't really get around the red. Beatrice said there was no one in the island but Battler, she's not Battler, and she also said no one could have interfered. So, I don't think a human could have killed him.


Not necessarily just people. I believe Beatrice may represent many different things.
That's what I mean to say actually. That the name Beatrice can refer to things as well. However I have another way to explain the last riddle.
__________________

Jan-Poo is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 16:33   Link #1308
k//eternal
do you know ベアトリーチェ様?
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 35
What's that?
k//eternal is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 16:54   Link #1309
Jan-Poo
別にいいけど
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
It's part of my "novel theory". Every game (except the first 1 maybe) is a story created by Beatrice although with set rules and with the purposes of creating alternatives scenarios so to give Battler other chances to solve the mystery.

Beatrice being the Game Master or "author" of the story has almost absolute power over the gameboard. So as the "author" she can "kill" any "character" on the gameboard at will. piece Battler was indeed the only piece left, however Beatrice tired of that game simply erased it in the end after "killing" piece Battler.

Not unlike an RPG, players can use "I" and "you" both referring to the actual player or their character. And in this case they even roleplay themselves

Of course I don't really expect this to be completely true in the end, but right now is the theory that imho explains most mysteries without acknowledging magic or postulating situations that are impossible (or close to that) to happen in the real world.
__________________

Jan-Poo is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 19:14   Link #1310
Ithekro
Gamilas Falls
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
However the question becomes, after that, what is Beatrice...the one that didn't wait for Battler at the end? The one that became dust in his arms?
__________________
Dessler Soto, Banzai!
Ithekro is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 19:23   Link #1311
Marion
The Great Dine
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ithekro View Post
However the question becomes, after that, what is Beatrice...the one that didn't wait for Battler at the end? The one that became dust in his arms?
A ruined sandcastle B)~

/shot to death

I'm sure she'll be back. People might throw a riot if Beato won't show up in an episode.
Marion is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 19:38   Link #1312
desirebluesky
* ahaha.wav *
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: カケラの海
Age: 33
Send a message via MSN to desirebluesky
Quote:
A ruined sandcastle B)~
Spoiler for img:
i think she should be absent at least for EP6. i mean, why even 'kill' her if you're gonna ressurect her right after. <.<
i bet we're gonna see piece!Beatrice though.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Ithekro View Post
However the question becomes, after that, what is Beatrice...the one that didn't wait for Battler at the end? The one that became dust in his arms?
eh, i think she's a seperate entity on her own.
Spoiler for higurashi:
i think it's possible that she was born from all the things called 'Beatrice' in the Rokkenjima of real world, but it's also possible she was born from a sigle human beeing using that name, and she just atributes the witch and all the other things to herself.
the meta Beatrice and all of the game-board entities called 'Beatrice' are separate, i believe.

i probably fail at getting my point across here.
desirebluesky is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 21:08   Link #1313
luckyssol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by desirebluesky View Post
i bet we're gonna see piece!Beatrice though.
I get your point and I agree that there probably won't be a meta Beatrice in episode 6 but I guarantee that we'll see Beatrice in episode 6. Her magic world version is part of the game board and will always be there at the start of a new game regardless of her meta world version's status.

There are two questions that have completely different answers:
-What is Beatrice(magic world/game board version)?
-What is Beatrice(meta world version)?

Beatrice on the game board
I think a huge clue is that most of the people who survive to the very end of each episode die but we are never shown how they die. Whatever kills Battler in episode 4 should also be what kills everyone else at the end of the other episodes in my opinion. How did Eva survive in episode 3? Why is there a time limit to this game?

Beatrice in the meta world
Battler initially said that if not everyone accepts Beatrice's existence then she does not exist. But it seems to be the case that if someone denies Beatrice's existence then she exists. I think that's why Beatrice called him a liar before she crumbled because Battler said he would always continue to deny her existence.
__________________
[...]
luckyssol is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 21:30   Link #1314
Tyabann
Homo Ludens
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ssol View Post
Beatrice on the game board
I think a huge clue is that most of the people who survive to the very end of each episode die but we are never shown how they die. Whatever kills Battler in episode 4 should also be what kills everyone else at the end of the other episodes in my opinion. How did Eva survive in episode 3? Why is there a time limit to this game?
I've... never liked the earthquake/natural disaster explanation because it really invalidates what I feel is a big part of a, you know, murder mystery.

Assuming that's true, though, Eva survived because she fled to Kuwadorian, right?
Tyabann is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 21:36   Link #1315
Renall
BUY MY BOOK!!!
 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaisos Erranon View Post
Assuming that's true, though, Eva survived because she fled to Kuwadorian, right?
We don't know. Eva is in the mansion as events conclude in ep3, yet in ep4 we're told she was found by rescuers at Kuwadorian. So whether she went there for safety or survived whatever happened and traveled there isn't clear.

I think it's most probable that Kuwadorian is a safe place from whatever happens. Eva's most likely move once she thought that everyone was dead (she probably never found Jessica, who was likely killed by whatever happens at midnight) would likely have been to flee to the gold or Kuwadorian though. The mansion isn't safe (or at least she'd assume as much), and she knows only she (and Rosa but heh) has solved the epitaph, so it seems reasonable to guess that if she goes there she can defend herself more easily.
Renall is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 21:36   Link #1316
Jan-Poo
別にいいけど
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
I don't like the idea of separating real Beatrice from metaBeatrice because of the promise Battler made in ep4.

If the two are one and the same, then Battler can simply kill the witch Beatrice while the real Beatrice will keep on living. In the other case, killing that Beatrice means she will die forever, or sleep forever like the epitaph says. In both cases is a bad ending :/
__________________

Jan-Poo is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 21:39   Link #1317
Tyabann
Homo Ludens
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renall View Post
she probably never found Jessica, who was likely killed by whatever happens at midnight
She was. Jessica "went to the golden land", like the survivors usually do.

So, the question is... what kind of disaster would destroy their bodies like that? And why is Kuwadorian safe from it?

A landslide does seem the most likely, since it's so centralized, but... it doesn't make much sense given the geography of the island.
Tyabann is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 21:48   Link #1318
Ithekro
Gamilas Falls
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
What if the "golden land" is the place where the gold is....something like a bomb shelter. If they went there, there are a few possibilities for why no one finds them

A. Tidal wave/typhoon. Covers up the entrance...they cannot get out.

B. Similar, but before they get in, resulting in them being drown and or ripped apart by debris.

C. They hide out, the investigators come and go without finding them. Now there is no communications to shore...no boat. Then what? They come out..they have the gold, shelter, some stores of food...but then what? Wait until the next boat comes? Wait until 1998?



There is no word on what happens at midnight on the 6th in Episode 5 is there? Or after the game?
__________________
Dessler Soto, Banzai!
Ithekro is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 21:52   Link #1319
Jan-Poo
別にいいけど
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
Volcanoes can work too, since it isn't so rare for them to erupt from a side and not from the top.

There is also the bomb hypothesis or the fire hypothesis. It can be many things.
What I find really strange is the fact that the Rokkenjima Incident was never officially declared as a crime. Even so it was labeled Rokkenjima serial murder mystery by talk shows and magazines.
This happened around two years later after the discovery of the second letter in the bottle.

It seems that the public decided that the letters were true and the police covered everything up. They must have thought that Eva bribed them.

However we know that those talk shows and magazines are pure shit. And we know that the letters are not reliable.

We also know that there are corpses that were never found, even though they weren't labeled as "missing" in the TIPS like Nanjo.

What the hell could have happened?
__________________

Jan-Poo is offline  
Old 2009-10-16, 22:01   Link #1320
Ithekro
Gamilas Falls
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
Well if it was natural, like the typhoon, a tidal wave, or a volcano (though the last one would have made the news), the bodies could have been washed away to see, or scattered around the island. It is possible to be carried off by a hurricane and land relatively safely...it isn't common, but it has happened. Thus opens the possibility of Eva having been in the mansion, having it hit by the winds, but she's carried aloft to be deposited at or near the Kuwadorian.

It is a long shot, and right now, doesn't make all that much sense when the plot keeps its focus on the murders and they mystery.
__________________
Dessler Soto, Banzai!
Ithekro is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We use Silk.