2010-01-06, 01:08 | Link #5082 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Erika doesn't exist in the first four games because she dies before or shortly after washing up on the island. Shannon could have used any corpse for this part. That the corpse at hand happened to be Erika's is not significant to Beato's game.
__________________
|
2010-01-06, 01:08 | Link #5083 |
do you know ベアトリーチェ様?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 36
|
Shannon can't be playing dead if she's standing right there.
Erika's corpse certainly can influence EP1-4, just as "some girl found dead on the beach". Prior to knowing about Erika, ideas like "prepared corpse" or "mannequin" have also been suggested, if that's more palatable. Incidentally, "mannequin" evades the identification red text, although it would still require Nanjo to play along or be incredibly incompetent. (EDIT: haa, sniped) |
2010-01-06, 03:53 | Link #5085 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: HK, China
|
I have seen many theories on motive, and generally they were targeting at Shannon, Jessica and George.
Shannon, Jessica: Either one of them made a crush on Battler six years ago, and when Battler ran away from the family. This broke their hearts and thus created an alternate personality Beatrice. And for some reasons, they planned to kill the whole family, believing that this could make Battler recall his promise. George: He planned to kill all the people on Rokkenjima such that he could inherit all the money, and he was sure about Shannon would agree to his proposal. Just that everytime something went wrong and he got killed in the process or Sayo betrayed him. So the end result was usually Ange getting all the inheritance. Again, Battler's sin was his breaking Sayo's heart six years ago. Question: Could one actually find clues that Jessica and Shannon loved Battler instead of Kanon and George at all? On the other hand, the series went on and on to portray these two pairs' pure love relationships. I realized that most people thought my motive theory of Kyrie was so bad that people don't even bother to respond here . But I strongly believe that my theory was probably a richer and told a better tale of Battler's sin than the above theories, which detailed how Maria was involved (which was what was emphasized over and over in EP4), and also combined information from EP6. ------------ Sorry for the hard-selling here. But really I wanted to know how others assess this theory I have thought out so hard. Even if it sounds like a pet theory. Last edited by ijriims; 2010-01-06 at 05:26. |
2010-01-06, 06:56 | Link #5087 |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
My problem is that the game should have enough clues to be solved by EP 4. But we didn't even know about Erika's existence until EP 5. So crafting a solution involving her should be impossible. It was also stated in red she had no influence on any previous games either, which I think should include using her corpse as a body double.
|
2010-01-06, 07:52 | Link #5088 |
Just... disturbed.
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
I want to say something, but I don't know if this is the right place to say it.
I'm pretty sure that the culprit definitely has something to do with our Beatrice who died in 1967. Whether it is someone related to that Beatrice or considers himself/herself another "Beatrice", it is not known. However, even though Beato acts as if she's all the Beatrices rolled into one, I think that in the game board, there's one thing we can make sure - there are several 'Beatrices', some of which might be the same people, and some not. Following: - 1967 Beatrice. Gets 'killed' by Rosa. - Legend of the Gold Beatrice. The "Beatrice" created by the legend of the witch that the Rokkenjima peeps believed. - Kinzo's obsessed-about Beatrice. Might be one or both of the above. - The Beatrice who sent the letter to Maria. - The Beatrice who wrote in Maria's grimoire, as well as the bottle-letter-writer. - The Beatrice who drew the magic circles. - And finally, the "Culprit" Beatrice. As long as we can try to find the possible people who can fit into each one of the above, will it make the whole thing easier? |
2010-01-06, 08:11 | Link #5089 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
-"Golden butterflies" in the hallway. Red herring of being attacked by the culprit? -The magic circle on Natsuhi's door. Random misdirection? -The door slamming. Fake testimony from both of them? -Why he doesn't just disappear like in Ep2. He was going to, but changed his mind after he ran out the door? -Nanjo went to the parlor from the study and not outside. Shannon chased them there with a gun? -Natsuhi's smoking gun. Missed? Other comments: -Genji doesn't seem to care about going off by himself, but he insists that Kanon not walk around by himself alone. Even a minute or two without Genji around seems unlikely. Also, if Genji goes ahead without Kanon, it's even harder to explain how Kanon got to the kitchen, then the storehouse, and back to the guestroom before Genji arrived with Natsuhi (considering that the distance between the kitchen and the parlor where she is was described as not too far.) -Maybe the others of the first four in the room were busy going after the culprit or quivering in terror, but Genji seems like the type of person where the first thing he would do would be to rush to Kanon and attempt to cut off the bleeding. -I don't remember, does Nanjo know ahead of time that Kanon is Shannon? I guess Kanon told them the plan before Jessica or George could find out. |
|
2010-01-06, 08:11 | Link #5090 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Quote:
Real Beatrice is dead. |
|
2010-01-06, 08:21 | Link #5091 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-01-06, 10:27 | Link #5093 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: HK, China
|
Here it was gender neutral. You know, even if English uses himself, it can also be gender neutral.
I would want to know why Nanjo's granddaughter would actually pose as her grandfather. And if she was actually able to deceive everyone with make-up, I suppose Shannon would make herself look like Kanon as well..... the level of ridiculousness were comparable.... Well, who was Kanon then? |
2010-01-06, 10:41 | Link #5094 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
<Good>! I think I can handle all of these.
@Marion: Spoiler for size:
@Arkwright: I've taken the liberty of numbering your points to make them easier to respond to. Spoiler for size:
Sorry, rogerpepitone, I'll get to yours later.
__________________
|
2010-01-06, 10:53 | Link #5095 | ||
The unlucky one
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hiding
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2010-01-06, 11:39 | Link #5096 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
2. Can't check at the moment, but I seem to remember that when Genji saw the circle on the shed, he remembered something on Natsuhi's door that he described as a drawing, not as just random markings.
For the complaints about Kanon, I think the operative theory is that he broke the charade of being injured pretty much right away before anyone had a chance to undress him (perhaps he just said it in the hallway.) |
2010-01-06, 12:23 | Link #5097 | |
阿賀野型3番艦、矢矧 Lv180
Graphic Designer
Moderator Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Belgium, Brussels
Age: 38
|
On my way back from my last mid term, I was still thinking about Episode 6 last closed room, and something popped in my mind that look quite... an equivalent proof that deny the whole "shkanon" theory.
The red used that are important for this are: Battler and Kanon are different persons (戦人と嘉音は別人である。) When Battler was rescued, only Kanon entered in the guest room (戦人救出時、客室に入ったのは嘉音のみである。) From the moment you (Erika) entered in the room during the Logic Error, only you, Battler and Kanon went in and out of the guest room (そなたの入室からロジックエラー時まで、客室を出入りしたのは、そなたと戦人と嘉音のみだ。) There were 3 people: you (Erika), Battler and Kanon. (そなたと戦人と嘉音で、3人である。). Note: Beatrice respond to Erika's question regarding if there were 3 bodies. 3 people went in and out, for a total of 3 times. You (Erika) and Kanon went inside. Battler went outside. I've already stated with the red truth that about all names, none can introduce themselves with these, except the person in question. Therefore, only Erika, Battler and Kanon can be the persons in question. (3人、即ち3体が出入りした。そなたと嘉音は入ったのみ、戦人は出たのみ。全ての名は本人以外に名乗れな いと赤き真実ですでに語っている。よって、ヱリカ、戦人、嘉音の名はいずれも、本人にしか名乗 れぬのだ。) Because of this, I believe there is no leeway for Shannon, Sayo or whatever people to be in there. Even if one claims "persona" counts in "people" and that doesn't contradict the body count, then that will contradict with the red that state "who went in, and who went out" and "there were 3 persons" To summary: Only 3 persons were in the room : Erika, Battler and Kanon. If Kanon was also Shannon/Sayo/Beatrice, this will lead to an abnormal contradiction, since one of them would take Kanon's place, contradicting "who were in the room". I will also add that even if the red truth can be twisted so many times, I think it is hard to conclude that Kanon "suddenly switched" to other persona in that kind of convenient timing, and furthermore going past the "person count" despite Kanon should be counted as a persona as well by this logic. Of course, if you are stretching like no tomorrow the red, it isn't like I can advocate for or against that, since it is a open door to almost anything but heh... For that, I have however an extra clue: Remember when Erika asked Battler to confirm those who were in the room next to the cousin's room? She first asked to confirm who they are. However, when she asked to use the "everyone else" for the cousin's room, Battler was puzzled. And at that point, there is a narration part that states this: Quote:
I believe the conclusion of this closed room is that Kanon died and his corpse somewhere in the guest room. Again, remember that the red cannot count the dead at all, proved by Kinzo's existence.
__________________
Last edited by Klashikari; 2010-01-06 at 13:36. Reason: extra clue |
|
2010-01-06, 14:57 | Link #5099 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: HK, China
|
@chronotrig:
I want to know how you evade this red texts:身元不明死体について、その身元を全て保証する。即ち、替え玉トリックは存在しない! which Beatrice said particularly to rebuke Battler's claim that the body of the 3 (Genji, Nanjo and Kumasawa) were other people's. And you introduced Nanjo's daughter? |
2010-01-06, 15:22 | Link #5100 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
@Klash Spoiler for size:
__________________
|
|
|
|