2010-01-06, 16:58 | Link #5101 |
Blue Wizard
|
Random thought :
The letter Battler got in Ep5 with Kinzo's ring : it's an impossible letter. The letter was sealed with the family ring right? But the ring was inside the envelope. Therefore it's impossible to seal the envelope with the ring! Therefore the letter was faked, probably by Battler & co to confirm Battler as next head. |
2010-01-06, 18:26 | Link #5102 | |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-01-06, 18:44 | Link #5103 |
Senior Member
|
That's not how sealing wax works. It's blended so that applying force when the wax is solid is likely to break the wax, and applying force when the wax is part-melted would deform the imprint.
Besides, what would be the point of sealing the envelope containing the ring? The imprint in the seal is just as much evidence of Kinzo's favor as the ring itself. (Most likely, the ring was left with the gold in all episodes.) |
2010-01-06, 20:28 | Link #5105 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
About "Nanjo" being actually his granddaughter in disguise, is there even one hint for that? I know she's been mentioned, but I highly doubt that counts as a hint. I know there are several hints for Shkanon, but I don't think there's any for anyone to be posing as Nanjo.
Anyhow, may I ask a question about EP6's closed room? After Battler left, the chain was used to lock the door, right? Was it ever said anything about the possibility of escaping through the window? No one would have taken it seriously, had the letter not had that seal.
__________________
|
2010-01-06, 21:25 | Link #5108 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
If there's no seal, it could easily be a sham. There's the possibility the ring in the envelope was a replica. So, it wouldn't matter who put it there. We could easily conclude, as it was suggested earlier, that everything concerning this letter was just an elaborate act to force Battler as the new head.
__________________
|
2010-01-06, 21:30 | Link #5109 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
Spoiler for size:
__________________
|
|
2010-01-06, 22:34 | Link #5111 |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
How can Beato convey a truth to Battler that she does not know. Do you know how utterly pointless that makes everything. The Game Master cannot make a board unless they have an understanding of the game they are setting up. You cannot set up a chess game if you do not know where the pieces must be positioned at the start of the game.
I agree with Klash, this is just far too twisted with the red. I see no reason for Nanjo's granddaughter to disguise as her elderly grandfather. How would she set up such a disguise. If she can set up such a convincing disguise like that then it should be equally possible for someone to make their face look fully smashed without anybody realizing it. And just because someone can disguise as Nanjo doesn't mean they do. It's not really even a hint that someone can disguise as him to be frank. Hints need to be reasonable - there are clear hints of Shkannon (both never appearing in front of Battler at the same time, Kanon's missing body) but there are really no hints at Nanjo being someone in disguise. Besides that I would be extremely angry if this is a solution to the murders. Shkannon I can understand, but this is just too much. |
2010-01-06, 23:11 | Link #5112 |
Senior Member
|
Something I remembered when I was thinking things over:
In episode 1, Shannon's body is hidden at the back of the shed, and Hideyoshi's one of the few people to take a close look. IIRC, in episode 3, Shannon's body is hidden behind a couch, and Hideyoshi's the one who goes to get a close look. Any chance this can be worked into a hypothesis? As for the marks on Natsuhi's door: Ep 1: They appeared sometime between when Natsuhi went to sleep and when Genji woke Natsuhi up. Ep 2: They appeared sometime before Battler, Rosa, Maria, and Genji went up to the room. Genji probably went there in the morning, to try to wake Natsuhi, and may have passed there during his rounds later. Ep 3: They may or may not have appeared. Nobody is recorded as having been there. Ep 4: They did not appear. Ep 5: They did not appear. Spoiler for When they appeared:
I don't buy the suggestion that Spoiler:
|
2010-01-06, 23:12 | Link #5113 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
Spoiler for On servants:
Spoiler for Why only Nanjo?:
Quote:
Spoiler for size:
So yeah, this theory's still shaky on many levels, but you have to admit, it does explain a lot.
__________________
Last edited by chronotrig; 2010-01-06 at 23:30. |
||
2010-01-06, 23:46 | Link #5115 | |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
As for the "Who am I?" part - she is asking Battler to solve the final riddle. I'm pretty sure she knows who she is. And honestly just because a theory explains things doesn't mean it's entirely logical or for that matter reasonable. Think about Natsuhi - Erika put up very good points with the trial and made Natsuhi look like a reasonable culprit. Even Battler wasn't sure of it completely until Virgilia said Natsuhi wasn't the culprit in red. But just because the murders can be explained with Natsuhi being the culprit doesn't mean it's reasonable in the slightest if you consider how much she loves both Krauss and Jessica. |
|
2010-01-06, 23:55 | Link #5116 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
My theory explains the meta world, the game world, and the motives for the majority of the question arcs (though I haven't written down the details for EP2-4). It has some major flaws, but if these can be worked around, it might make a complete theory eventually.
__________________
|
|
2010-01-07, 00:05 | Link #5118 | |
Tenshi's Defense Squadron
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fighting against those who oppress the system
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-01-07, 00:46 | Link #5120 |
Purupurupiko-Man
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: My beloved hometown, the mackerel river running through it
|
Yeah, I thought that chronotrig was trying some sort of twisted logic experiment at first, but now I'm confused at how far he's been taking it. I'm sure that having an ill person do an impossible impersonation for no reason violates more Knox rules than it satisfies. And it's silly.
|
|
|