![]() |
Link #5241 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Just a very odd (and probably queer) theory, but if Shkanon is real... then this must mean this:
- George is gay or Jessica is a lesbian. Battler saw Shannon and Kanon but never together. If Kanon/Shannon was a crossdresser/bisexual, it would be more interesting. However, it wouldn't explain why Shannon/Kanon would want to go to that limit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5242 |
Intellectual Rapist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 3 12151805142615
|
Red truth in more than one way cuts down the shKanon theory. Especially the one that says no one would misidentify Kanon in the second episode, I think.
Also, I would how shKanon would be a he because that would be one flat-chested she seeing as you can't really hide breasts on Kanon's body. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5244 | |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
And need I remind you of the basic laws of physics. As TTR said, its impossible for that baby to be alive. besides with bern around i doubt anybody gets a miracle |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5245 | ||
Homo Ludens
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
|
Quote:
The idea is that Shannon/Kanon have some kind of variant of DID, also. Quote:
...This still works with Shkannon, mind. Notice the "different person" bit. The Shkannnon theory says that they aren't different people. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5246 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
I was thinking about how Ryukishi said that if you know the truth, you'd be able to predict the order of deaths past the ends of episodes 5 and 6. As far as I can tell, there's no concrete pattern, so I had the idea that maybe in each game the order of deaths is actually the same. It's just an idea at this point; I haven't put that much thought into it. But maybe there's some way to have a set order of death that works with the red truth and the detectives' perspectives.
Just a few thoughts on the matter:
Of course, I could be waaaaaay off here, but it's an alternative solution to the problem of the "predictable" death order. So maybe someone can think of some possible way a constant order works with the facts? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5247 | |
CONTRACTS
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5249 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5250 | |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5252 | |
The Great Dine
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5253 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Indonesia
|
just re-read epi 3.
What if the story of a servant severely injured and quit is a hint? It might be THAT servant. so, if she survived, no reason why the baby didn't. well, this baby business is just a speculation. Since...No red ever proclaimed anything about their life/death status, nor their connection to the game. Kumasawa and Genji must know about it since they're the only servants that had worked at that time. Except Kanon faked his age, he cannot be that baby. He's too young. But he could work together with the real culprit. For example, he called Natsuhi. The voice is said to resemble middle-school boy's voice. Spoiler for epi 5, Hideyoshi murder:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5254 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
The whole thing is odd. The servant took a walk through a grove of trees while having a baby in her arms, which should be quite difficult. To add to that, there was a 10 metres tall cliff on the other side, there was a fence and it was rocky below. Natsuhi did mention it was far too convenient that the servant went to that place while carrying the baby and then leaning against the fence. That's why she said that must have been the work of a demon.
If Natsuhi had taken them there personally, then that'd explain everything. However, if the servant went there own her own, then it's indeed a bit odd.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5255 |
Komrades of Kitamura Kou
Join Date: Jul 2004
Age: 39
|
You guys would be surprised. Infants and neonates have surprisingly high regenerative capabilities. They can in fact survive certain kinds of physical injury better than adults so you can't exactly say that a 1 year old child would fare worse in similar situations than fully grown people.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5256 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: HK, China
|
Merely from the fact that this 19th man's presence could not be found at all in EP1-4 I could conclude that he (or she) played no role in EP1-4, which meant he just had no importance to the core mysteries.
I am surprised people were still arguing with proponents or opponents of Shkanon theory, Shkantrice theory, Beatrice=XXX theory, "the baby 19 years ago was still alive" hypothesis etc. It is apparent to me this sort of theory would not be disproved completely because either there was not enough information or the red texts could be interpreted in some ways to fit in the theories. Going through debates with someone who would not change their minds until Ryukishi07 showned them the opposite was delibitating and futile, from my own experience. Rarely the end result was one of the sides will change their opinion unless they made some blatant mistakes. IMO, the more rewarding and useful thing to do was to propose one's own complete theories on Umineko. Maybe we should set up a thread to collect established theories on the game rather than this unassorted spoiler and speculation thread. And people could then compare the theories and maybe got some inspiration. Anyone agrees?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5257 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
That speculation thread is for speculation. Anyways, the problem with this Game is that the detective (and I and maybe several others) don't WANT to suspect the seemingly innocent family members. They may all of a motive, and a super scary troll face, but they seem innocent and nice. It's quite ironic |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5258 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
That's what I assumed back when reading EP3. The existence of 19th person, provided they exist, just makes that even clearer.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5259 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Hmm... I think people are forgetting that culprit is Beatrice/someone in the family.
If we look back at the beginning (EP1 which has NO magical element), someone gave Maria an umbrella and envelope. Who doesn't have an alibi? Since it's rainy, one can easily not recognize a person. Not only that, Maria didn't say she actually saw Beatrice in dress and nice hair, but merely someone called that. Could've been someone said "Call me Beatrice." Although this is a broken theory. Although, whoever gave Maria the umbrella could have been someone different then the one who gave the envelope. Not only that, why didn't the culprit bring Maria in? Maybe the culprit just gave in and heard the family arrive and ran away. So we know that the culprit was probably drying off. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #5260 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: HK, China
|
Quote:
The discussion before my previous post was debating whether a baby who fell a cliff would survive at all, which in my opinion, was meaningless as nobody from any side can provide conclusive argument, the end result will just be proponents and opponent sticking to their own opinion like before. ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|