2007-09-24, 01:22 | Link #1 |
♪♫ Maya Iincho ♩♬
Artist
|
Salt water as Fuel? neato ^_^
Just recently found this rather innovative concept of burning salt water for fire. (though i'm not sure this is true, I think it's still good to post this up)
Article Link --> http://green.yahoo.com/index.php?q=node/1570 movie link --> http://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/001312.html While the concept is really neat and interesting, energy to energy it's not "economical" to use this as a energy crisis replacement.
__________________
|
2007-09-24, 02:30 | Link #3 |
Moving in circles
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Singapore
Age: 49
|
Considering how we may soon become Waterworld (what with the North Pole's ice cap at its smallest recorded extent tihs year), this seems like quite a neat idea indeed. Provided that there is still enough land around to build the power plants that would burn salt water.
|
2007-09-24, 02:47 | Link #4 |
Thinking outside the box
Graphic Designer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 38
|
That is nice, now if they would be so kind to give info about how much energy is needed to create those radio-frequency that makes the salt burn we might actually have something useful here. It might not be so useful if the radio frequency requires more energy than burning salt water itself provides.
__________________
|
2007-09-24, 03:40 | Link #6 |
delicious caek
|
Chemistry is not my strong subject, but if I'm not mistaken, aren't the hydrogen - oxygen bonds in water molecules exceptionally strong? I don't think this is a viable alternative. You'll use up more energy generating the radio waves than you'll gain by "burning" salt water.
(and salt weakens the said hydrogen - oxygen bonds? I didn't know that... but I don't think the effect will be strong enough to negate the energy expenditure) tl;dr: nuclear power ftw. |
2007-09-24, 05:45 | Link #7 |
eyewitness
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Water doesn't burn, it's already the "ash" of burned hydrogen. Separating water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen just to let them react again means a net energy gain of zero. Theoretically. Practically it's less.
I wouldn't buy stocks of Mr. Kanzius' company just yet.
__________________
|
2007-09-24, 21:10 | Link #8 | ||
♪♫ Maya Iincho ♩♬
Artist
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2007-09-25, 15:08 | Link #11 |
Ha ha ha ha ha...
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Right behind you.
Age: 35
|
There are better alternate forms of energy, which I won't go into. However, I think his time would be better spent researching cures for cancer, and not alternate forms of energy. I think he was on to something good with the cancer bit, but leave alternate fuel sources to those biochemists out there that understand the fundamentals of biotechnology better.
__________________
|
2007-09-25, 15:31 | Link #12 |
Jag äter idioter
Graphic Designer
|
I agree, there's no use researching with a net gain of zero. Plus, why waste more water? I still prefer hydrogen (no matter that production as of now is really expensive) because it's byproduct is water.
Of course, then again, we'd all have nuclear powered cell phones right now if my mom's friend hadn't sold his patent to Motorola. And who knows where that might have led us to. =/
__________________
|
2007-09-26, 01:45 | Link #15 | |
Love Yourself
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northeast USA
Age: 38
|
Quote:
And to all the people saying "he should research cancer and not waste time on these other energy methods," this is how science works. Information and ideas are mixed and spread. This may not be an end-all solution to the world's energy problems, but it may have applications elsewhere that neither you nor I could even imagine right now.
__________________
|
|
2007-09-26, 02:23 | Link #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ALASKA!!! W00t! I'm BACK FINALLY!!!!
Age: 36
|
Quote:
|
|
2007-09-27, 01:00 | Link #17 |
♪♫ Maya Iincho ♩♬
Artist
|
Yeah, it was never explained into much detail anyway. It must have some kind of significance if the title had "saltwater" in it. Though it was never stated that fresh water couldn't result in the same effect.
Lets just assume for discussion sake it only works with salt, then the composition including the salt is necessary for the effect to take place. First of all we just have to do some diagnostics on it. Salt = Sodium and Chlorine, which can both burn Water = Hydrogen and Oxygen, Hydrogen + Oxygen = explosion in the right mixture I have no idea where the radio waves come into place here. If you can separate all the elements there then you have 3 flammable substances and a fuel to make it burn hotter.
__________________
|
|
|